Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How long are we supposed to have to wait for the benefits of the bailout to trickle down?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:01 PM
Original message
How long are we supposed to have to wait for the benefits of the bailout to trickle down?
Is there even any expectation that this legislation will do anything more than just keep the credit market from failing further? Is anyone pretending that this effort will actually work to address the failing mortgages which are at the heart of the credit breakdown?

If we don't do anything about stemming the increasing tide of these failing mortgages this effort won't last any longer than we're willing to provide the Treasury to hold this debt. How long can our government hold onto the bad debt? If there's no expectation that the housing crisis will subside, I don't think we can expect any significant easing of credit,

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. What bailout?
Edited on Mon Sep-29-08 04:02 PM by Richardo
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. the proposed one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Looks like we don't have to worry about that one anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. In addition to the mortgage program already passed
which includes money for a national housting trust and down payment assistance -

the bail-out bill would have had a mechanism to encourage lenders to write down mortgages as well as the re-insurance of some of these sub-prime mortgages, which was proposed by Republicans.

I don't think it would have fixed the entire economy because I don't think sub-prime loans are the problem anymore. But it would have been a blue tarp until we could get a good contractor in the house to see what really needs to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I wan't aware that the write-down measure ended up in the final bill
Was it a significant measure, or just a wish and a prayer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It was not the bankruptcy provision
But this is legislation directed to lenders, not the judiciary. And there was a write-down provision, although I don't know how it would have worked. Like the current HOPE mortgage plan, it takes citizens to give a shit every single day to make sure legislation is working the way it's supposed to. Governments cannot be run by uninformed reactionaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. When and if there is one I'd say about 5 years.
So don't hold your breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. that's my impression
. . . IF the lenders find the 'remedies' managable and sustaining. It's hard to see the credit market stabilizing without the housing market recovering. It's hard to see the housing market recovering without the economy improving. It's hard to see the economy improving soon with the government so deep in debt. It's hard to see the debt going down with this big an expenditure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. probably a dollar a year... that would be 700 billion years. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Some of us are still waiting for the benefit from Reaganomics
but it'll be here soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Forever
Because that money will NEVER come back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC