Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney should resign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 03:56 PM
Original message
Cheney should resign

Cheney should resign

By Mark Mellman
March 14, 2007

Dick Cheney should resign his office.

The vice president should not be banished simply because he has become one of the most unpopular figures in American political history, nor because his incessant vitriol, heaped upon everyone with whom he disagrees, poisons our discourse and divides our country. Rather, the vice president should vacate his office because doing so is the only way to bring an honorable end to a miserable tenure.

By resigning, Cheney could give substantive meaning to Republican calls for personal responsibility.

Snip...

His errors have certainly produced consequences for others — nearly 3,200 Americans are dead, and over 20,000 are wounded, at potentially a trillion dollars in cost to the taxpayers. To what end — to eliminate WMDs that, in fact, had been dismantled more than a decade before we invaded?

Snip...

However, the vice president has not simply made mistakes, he has told lies, repeatedly. While being wrong is not an indictable offense, lying to the country is.

Snip...

The most recent entry on Cheney’s rap sheet is the conviction of his chief of staff, Lewis “Scooter” Libby, for perjury in a trial where the prosecutor was clear about the “cloud hanging over what the vice president did” and the jury itself was demanding to see Cheney in the defendant’s dock. What kind of a person blithely goes about his business while a loyal lieutenant faces a prison term for protecting him?

more...



Cheney in 1991 (via Think Progress):

Well, just as it’s important, I think, for a president to know when to commit U.S. forces to combat, it’s also important to know when not to commit U.S. forces to combat. I think for us to get American military personnel involved in a civil war inside Iraq would literally be a quagmire. Once we got to Baghdad, what would we do? Who would we put in power? What kind of government would we have? Would it be a Sunni government, a Shi’a government, a Kurdish government? Would it be secular, along the lines of the Ba’ath Party? Would be fundamentalist Islamic? I do not think the United States wants to have U.S. military forces accept casualties and accept the responsibility of trying to govern Iraq. I think it makes no sense at all.

link


Cheney this month:

"It is simply not consistent for anyone to demand aggressive action against the menace posed by the Iranian regime while at the same time acquiescing in a retreat from Iraq that would leave our worst enemies dramatically emboldened and Israel's best friend, the United States, dangerously weakened," Cheney said.

link



Cheney and Halliburton:

Cheney was Halliburton's chief executive from 1995-2000 and the Bush administration has been accused of favoring the conglomerate with lucrative no-bid contracts in
Iraq.

Federal investigators last month alleged Halliburton was responsible for $2.7 billion of the $10 billion in contractor waste and overcharging in Iraq.

Halliburton last month announced a 40-percent decline in fourth-quarter profit, despite heavy demand for its oil field equipment and personnel.

link


Here's is how factcheck.org defended Cheney in 2004:

Cheney says he takes no part in matters relating to Halliburton, and so far we've seen no credible allegation to the contrary. Time magazine reported in its June 7 edition that an e-mail from an unnamed Army Corps of Engineers official stated that a contract to be given to Halliburton in March 2003 "has been coordinated w VP's office." But it wasn't clear who wrote that e-mail, whether the author had direct knowledge or was just repeating hearsay, or even what was meant by the word "coordinated," which could mean no more than that somebody in Cheney's office was being kept informed of contract talks.

Indeed, a few days later it was revealed that Cheney's chief of staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby was informed in advance that Halliburton was going to receive an earlier contract in the fall of 2002 -- to secretly plan post-war repair of Iraq's oil facilities. But being informed of a decision after it is made is a far cry from taking part in making it. And according to the White House, Libby didn't even pass on the information to Cheney anyway.


Cheney and Gonzales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, Darth must be impeached and not permitted to go off with honor.
He has dishonored this country and is guilty of the most gross war crimes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice research
It is beyond me how more Americans are not gathering in the streets demaind the removal of Crash Cart and Pretzelnut!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. factcheck was ALWAYS spinning best possibl;e scenario for Bush campaign throughout 2004.
They are vile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yup! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. He should be extradited to The Hague
But we all know that he will end up on one of the new man made Palm Tree shaped islands off Dubai, at least until the ticker gives out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, Cheney should NOT resign,,,
although it might make everyone feel good for a while, it would have consequences.

If Cheney resigns, his replacement will automatically become the frontrunner for the GOP nomination, and might even win. Remember Ford! He managed to avoid the Nixon taint and win. Another "nice guy" who could be approved by Congress could be taken as the new broom that sweeps clean and revitalize the Republicans now on the run. Very risky.

If Cheney stays, even though he might become President if Shrub is impeached, he will only further doom the fortunes of the GOP and ultimately might destroy their rightwing. Or at least damage it significantly.

For a long time I've been saying that we have to get rid of Cheney before we can impeach Shrub, but I've been rethinking that.

With the current mood of Congress, the disorganized Republicans, and the country as a whole, I doubt a Cheney Presidency for a year could cause any more damage than has already been done. He would get no breaks from Congress and every time he takes a piss he'll be watched and followed.

At this point, Cheney's reputation is one of our best talking points-- why screw that up?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. "While being wrong is not an indictable offense, lying to the country is."
Edited on Wed Mar-14-07 05:14 PM by ProSense
I think the article makes the case for Cheney to be indicted (after a trial I presume).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. i think the whole White House Mafia should drink the 'Grape' KoolAid and join Jim Jones, the end is
Edited on Wed Mar-14-07 04:23 PM by sam sarrha
near..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Resigning is too easy.
This man must pay and pay dearly with his soul and his pocketbook. Part of his punishment should be to pay back the millions he has made at all the soldier's expenses. And I usually reserve this for sex offenders, but I think we should nail his (obviously quite small) penis to a stump. Set the stump on fire. Hand him a knife. Okay, Okay at the very least, he should have to be spit at, stoned, pissed and deficated upon by all the family members of those lost!!! THIS MAN MUST PAY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC