Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“We just wanted to choose a really large number.” -- Treasury Department

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:06 AM
Original message
“We just wanted to choose a really large number.” -- Treasury Department
Edited on Sat Sep-27-08 08:13 AM by lostnfound
This quote has been posted in at least a couple of threads, but it deserves a thread of its own because not enough people know about it. It is a clear sign, along with the less-than-three-page length of the Paulsen "plan", that this entire situation is a dangerous and risky game with no bottom and perhaps a very tenuous relationship with reality.

From Forbes:
Where did the $700 Million number come from?
“It’s not based on any particular data point,” a Treasury spokeswoman told Forbes.com Tuesday. “We just wanted to choose a really large number.”

Let the word get out: The Bush administration is playing a game of extortion and economic terrorism, for both profit and politics. The Democrats MUST NOT fall for this. Take your time, don't sell out your country's future, and don't cut the power of the Obama administration off at the knees before it even begins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like an answer in grade school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Translation: We pulled the number out of our ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Another immoral act. Happy karma.
nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Diadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm quite sure the number actually came from the International Money Fund.
The International Money Fund gave the figure of $945 Billion in losses for banks worldwide over the next 2 years back in April at the meeting of the G7.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/g7-government-officials-top-global/story.aspx?guid=%7B53CAC551-50CB-4BE1-BF28-E6FBAB675C2C%7D

This is the report containing reasons for the problems and list of recommendations

http://www.fsforum.org/publications/r_0804.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. It doesn't mean they will get that number in the end.
By going piecemeal, Congress can stop when the ship is uprighted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phusion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R - to the Greatest page!
thanks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. They also made sure that it was less than a Trillion Dollars.
Edited on Sat Sep-27-08 08:57 AM by formercia
The real figure may be several Trillion but most people just can't comprehend that kind of expense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. They need to hurry in order to leap over the ten trillion mark before it gets here.


http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

(Note: This number increases every time you reload it. It probably went up a few million while you were reading this. Hit F5 to see.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. Bastards, just like the Patriot Act
Panic, Panic, Panic and then jam something through
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OakCliffDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. 700 billion is all the money we can print in one year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC