Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Prosecutor-gate': Bush's Power Grab by ROBERT PARRY -- (It's about stealing elections!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 01:22 PM
Original message
'Prosecutor-gate': Bush's Power Grab by ROBERT PARRY -- (It's about stealing elections!)
Edited on Wed Mar-14-07 02:01 PM by BuyingThyme
'Prosecutor-gate': Bush's Power Grab
by ROBERT PARRY

In 2005, when the White House launched a plan to oust U.S. Attorneys who showed insufficient political loyalty, George W. Bush was hoping to solidify one-party Republican control of American political life, in part, through aggressive prosecution of Democrats for alleged “voter fraud.”

One part of Bush's power grab was to unleash attack-dog GOP prosecutors to rip into Democrats who had been trying to get more Americans to vote. But where Republicans claimed “voter fraud,” such as allowing some released felons to cast ballots, the Democrats saw Republican “voter suppression” aimed at frightening minority citizens away from the polls.

But the swing of a few hundred votes in some districts could mean giving the Democrats control of the House and Senate -- and subjecting the Bush administration to some serious oversight. So, by October 2006, when the White House now admits that Bush personally passed on Republican complaints to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales about the lack of urgency in addressing Democratic “voter fraud” cases, the GOP dream of near-permanent one-party governance was in grave jeopardy.

Ultimately, the refusal of U.S. Attorneys in New Mexico and elsewhere to fast-track the pre-election indictments of Democrats denied the Republicans a last-minute boost that might have kept one or both congressional chambers in GOP hands.

(more)


ON EDIT: I GUESS A LINK WOULD BE IN ORDER...

http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/2007/031407Parry2.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R !!! Parry is the best!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. It's about the voter fraud, stupid.
Edited on Wed Mar-14-07 01:42 PM by BuyingThyme
The best thing about this commentary is how it brings voter fraud to full circle in very simple language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Hey, I berely know you. How did you know I'm stupid;)?
Edited on Wed Mar-14-07 03:26 PM by autorank
You're right! In the demand letter* sent by Washington State lobbyist McCabe to Cong. Doc Hastingd, (R- WA), this one, look who is the third cc. "John Fund." Could it be the WSJ John Fund, champoin of the meaningless "voter fraud" canard? Letter

*"demanding" Hastings get Western Washington State Prosecutor McKay fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. prosecutor-gate is too clumsy.
Attorneygate rolls off the tongue much more easily. Possibly because of the subtle similarity to 'tourniquet', and the implied bloodletting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Karl "had the math" remember?
Karl knew things we didn't know...remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. good point!
I had forgotten about that!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I remember.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. The math:
Rove said, "And I add up to a Republican Senate and a Republican House. You may end up with a different math, but you're entitled to your math. I'm entitled to 'the' math."

http://progressivedailybeacon.com/more.php?page=opinion&id=1325
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Karl had the Math,Ted had the Meth and Bush has another Mess!
Edited on Wed Mar-14-07 04:32 PM by Hubert Flottz
I wonder why Ted Haggard never got busted for the Meth? Think BushCo had a fix in with the feds in Colorado? Who knows where or what they fixed? Think they fixed Ann's voter fraud troubles in Florida? Think they fixed Rush's drug troubles in Florida? Think they fixed FoleyGate in Florida? I think the BushCo Inc. Mob just might have owned somebody, some way!

EDIT...So here we have another Huge cloud around the White House this week, like we had last week with the Libby scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanmuegge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. What about the CIA purge of that time?
Right after Bush's corporate reselection as King in 2004, they proceeded to purge the CIA of anyone who disagreed with the factually flawed PR campaign leading up to the war. If you look at the circumstances there and with the prosecutors, it becomes clear that this went to the highest levels of the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. That purge isn't going to make headlines till more agents and analysts come out
to speak about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yes, it might be a while because, as people here have said,
it's the people who were not purged (i.e. U.S. attorneys) who have the most to say/lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. another *&^%ing -gate...
jeezus...come up with another way to refer to scandals...this has passed it's acceptable shelf-life...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. evening kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. Another k & r -- damn good article! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. And the link at the bottom to his article about "Managed Democracy"
leads to a great piece from 2005.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC