Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DURBIN TIES $$$ CRISIS TO IRAQ WAR-Calls For Repeal Of Bush Tax Cuts To Pay $700 Billion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:46 PM
Original message
DURBIN TIES $$$ CRISIS TO IRAQ WAR-Calls For Repeal Of Bush Tax Cuts To Pay $700 Billion
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 04:53 PM by kpete
Durbin Ties Economic Crisis To Iraq War, Calls For Repeal Of Bush’s Tax Cuts To Pay For $700 Billion Bailout

In an interview today with ThinkProgress, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) directly tied today’s fiscal crisis to the Iraq war:

Transcript:

DURBIN: The Iraq war has driven us deeply into debt. We borrowed $700 or $800 billion to finance that war, mainly from foreign companies, which have flooded our markets with investments — many of them in the big problem areas we talked about, like subprime mortgages. So they have just compounded the problem and we have invited them in, because of the debt that we have. This has been the first president in the history of America to ask for a tax cut in the midst of a war. He made the debt situation even worse.

The accumulated debt of America from the beginning of this country to today is about $9.7 trillion. In the last two or three weeks, we have accumulated additional liability for our government — $5 trillion by our guaranteeing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, $3.5 trillion by guaranteeing with FDIC deposit insurance money market mutual funds.

Then we put the suggestion now, some $700 or $800 billion on the table for this bailout. Then of course we have the purchase of Bear Stearns for $29 billion and the purchase of a major share of AIG for $80 billion. When you total it up, it turns out that the accumulated exposure added to the national debt over the last several weeks equals the entire debt that we have accumulated in the history of this nation.

So this administration will leave town with a sad record when it comes to foreign policy, for the worst decision made in modern memory — the invasion of Iraq — and for the most disastrous economic policy since the Great Depression. It’s not exactly a great send-off gift for America.



Transcript and Video at:
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/09/26/durbin-iraq-economy/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's my Senator. And I'm proud of him, as usual. Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kicked and recommended, this column is well worth reading.
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 04:50 PM by Uncle Joe
Thanks for the thread, kpete.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. FINALLY!!!!!!
Thank you, Senator Durbin, for answering the clue phone. Now go the other few inches and admit stiffing us on wages for 40 years is the other piece of the puzzle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Damn straight! Let those who have profited the most from this war of lies
pay the price to fix the economy. They are, after all, the ones most able to do so...

How about it Halliburton?

Exxon?

Shell?

Hello...











...I only hear crickets... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveFool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R, a very good read /nt
Durbin would be a great choice for Majority Leader. Do we get to choose leaderships if we hold onto the majority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. There ya go!
If they really, really want the bail out, then they can give up their precious tax cuts. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. I go for this one....if only..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gademocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. About damn time some Dem started saying this - and RAISE Corp/super$$ taxes while they're at it!
It has been incredibly frustrating to watch the Dems mostly creep around in muted voices when this golden opportunity has been given them.

Corporations and the Super Rich have been sticking it to the ordinary worker/taxpayer (not to mention how they've crushed the poor), sticking it to States and Cities, so again the ordinary tax-payer gets burdened with increased fees, property taxes, and un-fixed roads, water, bridges, and unfunded services - for years and years while they skip off to paying next to nothing - sometimes nothing.

About time the Dems start talking taxes on the rich and corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let's allow the CEOs to get their huge paychecks
and then TAX IT ALL AWAY!

mwa ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. sadly there were for the Tax cuts before they were against them
:eyes:

Democrats back fourth Bush tax cut for wealthy, business
By Patrick Martin
28 September 2004

Back to screen version | Send this link by email | Email the author

In an action that exemplifies the prostration of the Democratic Party before the Bush administration and corporate wealth, the vast majority of Democratic senators and congressmen voted with the Republicans to approve a $146 billion tax cut bill proposed by the White House. The legislation passed the Senate September 23 by a near-unanimous vote of 92-3, while the House approved the bill on the same day, by a margin of 339-65.

Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry and vice presidential candidate John Edwards did not leave their campaigns to return to Washington for the vote, but both indicated they would have voted for the bill. Kerry issued a statement that tried simultaneously to criticize Bush and endorse the fiction that Bush’s tax cut would aid working people, declaring: “Millions of American families are being squeezed by the weak Bush economy, falling incomes and rising health costs, and we should extend middle-class tax breaks to help them.”

Like the three previous tax bills pushed through by the Bush administration and the Republican congressional leadership—in 2001, 2002 and 2003—the latest legislation uses modest cuts for working class and middle-class families as a smokescreen for far more generous benefits lavished on the wealthy and on favored business interests.

The bill extends to 2009 the $1,000-per-child tax credit, which would otherwise fall to $700 next year. It also extends an expansion of the 10 percent income-tax bracket until 2010, and a tax break for two-income married couples until 2008. All three tax breaks were adopted as part of Bush’s original 2001 package, and were deliberately scheduled to expire at the end of 2004 to provide a vehicle for new tax breaks for the wealthy on the eve of the next presidential election.

Among the tax breaks piggy-backed on this extension of “middle-class” tax benefits are $13 billion in business tax breaks for a variety of purposes, ranging from subsidies to companies that use wind-generated energy to deductions for corporate research and development.

Another $22.6 billion will benefit an upper-income layer of the middle class, those with family incomes of $150,000 or more, who would otherwise be subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT), a tax enacted in the 1970s to insure that wealthy individuals did not use various tax credits to evade taxation altogether. Because the AMT is not indexed to inflation, a sizeable layer of upper-income middle-class families now fall under its provisions, and that number will increase substantially over the next decade.

The tax cut legislation had a second purpose, besides continuing the looting of the federal treasury by the wealthy. It completes the process of locking in all of the tax cuts enacted during Bush’s first term through the end of 2008. This means that if Kerry wins the election and succeeds Bush in the White House, he will face a federal budget with an enormous built-in deficit that will be a fixture throughout his entire first term in office. Kerry’s endorsement of the bill thus amounts to an acknowledgment in advance that the Democratic candidate’s promise of a major health care initiative will be scrapped soon after he takes office.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/sep2004/tax-s28_prn.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hear, hear! Good ideas all around.
:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC