Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jack Murtha sued by Marine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Seeking Serenity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:31 AM
Original message
Jack Murtha sued by Marine
Marine sues Rep. Murtha
Says congressman slandered him

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

A Washington County Marine who was cleared in the 2005 Haditha incident in Iraq sued his congressman yesterday, saying U.S. Rep. John P. Murtha, D-Johnstown, slandered him and interfered with his right to a fair trial.

Justin Sharratt, 24, of Canonsburg, was one of eight Marines charged two years ago with the killing of Iraqi civilians during a firefight. Seven of the Marines were later cleared -- a prosecutor strongly argued that Mr. Sharratt was, in fact, innocent -- while the government is seeking to reinstate charges against the eighth.

Events in Haditha remain the subject of debate. Several civilians said they saw Marines kill bystanders, while investigators later discounted those claims, in some instances citing forensic evidence.

Mr. Sharratt himself said he killed three people, all of whom were later identified as armed insurgents.

As details of the events unfolded, Mr. Murtha, whose 12th Congressional District includes Canonsburg, repeatedly spoke of the episode as "cold-blooded" killing and compared it to the 1968 My Lai massacre in Vietnam.

(snip)

Mr. Murtha's office yesterday did not respond to a request for comment.


I don't expect this to go very far. Mighty hard to sue a congressman and win. What do you think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know how he can say 'interfered with his right to a fair trial'..when
he was found NOT GUILTY???? I don't know how that charge would hold water???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeking Serenity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It sounded like he was going for a defamation suit.
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 10:37 AM by muddleofpudd
I guess he thinks Murtha essentially called him a murderer prior to any conviction of the crime.

I still think it's a thin beef and likely will get thrown out before trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC