Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Compare US and UK Version of OH Election Workers Sentenced:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 09:08 AM
Original message
Compare US and UK Version of OH Election Workers Sentenced:
Edited on Wed Mar-14-07 09:11 AM by mod mom
Ohio Election Workers Sentenced

Wednesday March 14, 2007 12:16 AM

By THOMAS J. SHEERAN

Associated Press Writer

CLEVELAND (AP) - Two county election workers were sentenced Tuesday to 18 months in prison for rigging a recount of 2004 presidential election ballots so they could avoid a longer, detailed review.

Jacqueline Maiden, 60, a Cuyahoga County election coordinator who was the board's third-highest ranking employee, and ballot manager Kathleen Dreamer, 40, each were convicted of a felony count of negligent misconduct of an elections employee.

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Judge Peter Corrigan allowed the women to remain free on bail pending appeal, but indicated he thought there was a more widespread conspiracy among election officials.

``I can't help but feel there's more to this story,'' Corrigan said.

-SNIP

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6478091,00.html

compare w U.S. version:

Two Cuyahoga County Board of Elections workers have received the maximum sentence for taking illegal shortcuts in the 2004 pres recount.
Judge Peter Corrigan sentenced Jacquline Maiden and Kathleen Dreamer to 18 months in prison.

They were accused of rigging the recount to avoid extra work of a full recount.

The prosecutor claimed the two women are protecting senior election officials or board members. They denied that.

Both have been fired.

-snip

http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=64336

FUNNY BUT THE US VERSION FAILS TO MENTION THAT JUDGE CORRIGAN THOUGHT THERE WAS A MORE WIDESPREAD CONSPIRACY AMONG ELECTION OFFICIALS.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Credit ought to go to Associated Press, which is an American organization
You can find the AP story, with comment, in several American publications: http://news.google.com/news?q=%22help+but+feel+there%27s+more+to+this+story%22&scoring=d
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R...the Corporate Media will be dragged kicking and screaming into this story.
That's the gist of it. There is more than enough evidence that media neglect has been in place for a long time. The public has no problem with this story. They eat it up when presented on the internet but CM lacks the ability to fess up and tell the truth.

"Rigged Recount Conducted in Secret"

That's what Baxter said, the prosecutor, that's what he proved.

Now "Mzx for Vote Riggers, Judge Says More Involved"

If I can do it, why not CM?

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ...and it seems it is not simply a "denial" coming from the erroneous
belief that as a developed country this can not happen -

The conglomerate owners of the news organizations have benefited greatly from the election results.

grrrrr

recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC