Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Corn: As Dems Craft Bailout Bill, They Ought To Point Fingers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:05 AM
Original message
David Corn: As Dems Craft Bailout Bill, They Ought To Point Fingers
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/davidcorn/2008/09/as-dems-craft-bailout-bill-the.html

As Dems Craft Bailout Bill, They Ought To Point Fingers

By David Corn | September 23, 2008 11:21 AM



In reaction to the financial crisis, here's what the Democrats who control Congress ought to do:

1. Work vigorously on the bailout proposal submitted by Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson but add the populist provisions that Robert Reich and others are suggesting.

2. Point fingers.

Assigning blame ought to be a key component of the Democratic response to the current meltdown. And that ought not be hard to do. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator Harry Reid could set up a joint select committee to investigate the causes of the financial crisis. This committee then could start holding hearings immediately and haul before it the heads of the companies that have screwed up and imperiled the economy. This will not be a short list. Call in top officials from Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, AIG, Bear Stearns, Countrywide Financial, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac. Demand explanations from them. Explore how much money they pocketed personally while overseeing their institutions.

That's just a start. The committee should bring in experts who can explain (clearly!) how these players and others abused credit default swaps, subprime loans, mortgage-backed securities, and other hanky-panky financial products.

And there's more: the political side. Invite (or subpoena) lobbyists to appear and reveal what they did to win favorable treatment (that is, less regulation) for their Big Finance clients. Phil Gramm, the former Senate banking committee chairman, should be asked to explain what he was thinking when he used a sly legislative maneuver in late 2000 to win approval of a bill that kept swaps from being deregulated. And he ought to be asked what role financial industry lobbyists played in drafting that bill. Ditto for the 1999 legislation that tore down the firewall between commercial and investment banks.

Sure, this won't be easy. Members of Congress--Democratic and Republican--are complicit; many of them went along with the rush to deregulate. They will be reluctant to scrutinize their own actions and those of lobbyists who have donates to their campaigns. But self-examination is not too large a price to pay for putting $700 billion of taxpayer money on the line. Actually, anything less would be rather irresponsible.

From a market perspective, it would be quite useful to (a) learn who messed up and how they did so (so others can avoid similar mistakes) and (b) shame those who did (so they are driven out of the market and others fear similar sanction). If markets work, they should operate better with more accountability and transparency. The bottom line: blame is good.



David Corn: Slow Down the Mother of All Bailouts

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=4058407
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Right. Like the Dems in Congress are suddenly going to get a spine transplant. Not likely. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I long for the day when people like you, and me, can't and won't
Edited on Tue Sep-23-08 11:13 AM by babylonsister
dismiss every idea broached by 'it's never gonna happen'. That's such a lame response that precludes any discussion at all. It also makes it almost not worth it to post anything, because nothing will ever happen. So why are we here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. they should but most of them will not
When the GOP says they want bipartisan action, they mean they want Democrats to go along with THEM.

I think the entire bailout should be denied until after the election. Then we look again.

And if it gets done then, the NEW administration guides it, not Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC