Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC story about Obama's "negative" ads on now...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bbernardini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 05:48 PM
Original message
MSNBC story about Obama's "negative" ads on now...
Actually, they're talking about a poll which claims that Obama's ads are more negative than McCain's. Apparently, pointing out the truth is "negative." :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh for God's sake...the McAnus crowd has been personal, insulting,
and of course, just plain LIARS in their ads; Obama points out facts and HE'S called negative??
Kinda like Lady Rothschild calling Obama "elitist."
Wow. Just wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoMoreWar99 Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. obama elite?
dont you think someone with his money and education is a little elitist? I mean how can you have an ivy leage education and make millions and millions of dollars a year, but still truly understand the plight of an average american??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. You clearly have not been paying attention. Obama had a humble
childhood, went to college on scholarships, student loans, and intelligence, not legacy like Chimpy the Unelected Imbecile and McAnus. Obama has only made money in recent years, from the sale of his books. He deliberately took a low-wage job in Chicago when he COULD have been making much more, given his intellect and degree, but did it out of conscience and as someone who walks his talk, unlike rePiglicans like Chimpy, Cheney and McAnus.

Nice try, troll.
Obama is MUCH closer to most Americans' circumstances than Li'l Johnny, son and grandson of admirals, with his sugar-mama wife and his multiple homes and his total fuckin' cluelessness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brucefan Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. He got his Ivy "leage" education
through hard work and determination.How'd you get your's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Obama does NOT make millions and millions a year..you must be
thinking of mcsame's wife's trust fund???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Seriously?? Have you been living under a rock?
Edited on Thu Sep-18-08 06:21 PM by Blue Belle
He grew up on food stamps and worked his ass off to get his "Ivy League" education. He understands the plight of an average American better than anyone else in this race. Are you just uninformed or have strong feeling against those who attend Ivy League Universities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Welcome to DU!
How long did the other 98 NoMoreWar accounts last?

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbernardini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. As some folks have said, I want the smartest motherf**ker in the room as president.
If some people think he's elitist, that's fine with me. The people that think that are idiots anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Go. Fuck. Yourself. Troll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Apparently, telling the truth is negative.
And it is something I have no problem with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was upset that they lumped all the ads together - the lies and the unpalatable truth
McCain's negative ads are mostly lies or data twisted so much it amounts to lies. Obama's "negative" ads are pointing out the truth. But the guys on David Gregory's show talked about them as if they are the same type of ad.

Why do I even have the TV turned to that SOB?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. And this is why I turn MSNBC off when David Gregory is on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Smirking Gregory is never watched by me.
because he is among the creeps on tv. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good, maybe they'll play the ads over and over again on the loop da loop
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. David Gregory SUCKS!!
Any rebuttal of the NeoCon? Heck no. Just feed him another fluffball question. Gregory is a shill and a stain on real journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. How do they define....
negative ads?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caliman73 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. I saw that on Hardall yesterday
They claim that Obama has 77% negative ads to McCain's 55%. They had some douche from Factcheck on saying, "Well, it's not entirely untrue..." about some of his ads. They should be focusing on how McCain's team just outright lies and continues to do so after being called out on the lies. There was an Obama ad on how McCain voted to cut education. They were picking it apart by saying, "Well he actually only voted to CUT education once, 2 times he just voted AGAINST increasing funding. Okay? I guess voting against giving schools more of what they need to survive is not the same as voting not to give them the funding they need to survive. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. good, hasn't the media told us time after time negative ads work, yes they have.
and it's not Obama's fault that McCain has a negative record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trudyco Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. I like that - it's not Obama's fault that McCain has a negative record nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Can't help it - McCain sucks.. a Lot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. I hope they're showing the ads as they talk about them
show them over and over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. Claims that O's ads more negative,
or that there are MORE of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. Obama's ads are not 'attack' ads...
they point to the obvious facts which also expose McInsane for the shrill he and his comrade are.

It is one thing to bash someone with false accusations and other to expose them with truths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC