Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Using rethug logic, Bill Clinton kept us from having any attacks after the first WTC bombing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:23 AM
Original message
Using rethug logic, Bill Clinton kept us from having any attacks after the first WTC bombing
After the first WTC attack in '93, we weren't hit again until 2001. And that was WITHOUT all the massive civil liberties violations, without an illegal war, etc.

But don't expect the rethugs to ever acknowledge that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't mention that Bill's admin also caught the perps
someone might bust a vein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. that's when they start throwing around all the "other" terrorist attacks
that are out of country (so why don't they count the attacks on the military IN IRAQ?)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Because it's much more fun to have your cake and eat it too.
Republicans aren't exactly known for their consistency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. They blame Clinton for the attacks of 9/11. It was all his fault for not catching Bin Forgotten.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. What about 10/12/2000? USS Cole?
Or were you simply saying that no attacks took place within our borders? If so, I apologize for the intrusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. If we count the Cole, we have to count every act of so called terrorism
against our troops under Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoris Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. repub logic? According to repub logic,
9/11 was Clinton's fault, and our current economy? His fault too. Even after 8 years of bush, it's Clinton's fault, but it's b/c of the shrub's brilliant economic policy that it isn't worse.
Don't try to use repub logic, it kills brain cells
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Don't expect them to acknowledge their solution back then, either.
As I recall, their solution was always "bomb'em", without being too particular about who the "'em" were as long as they were Muslim. Except for the specific advice to "bomb Saddam".

If these same dimwits had been in charge in the '90s, I'm inclined to think two other major terrorist plots would have been successful (Ramsi Youssef's plot to bomb a dozen or so airliners over the Pacific, and the Millenium bombing plot), and each time the response would have been to bomb Saddam some more rather than collect the sort of intelligence needed to infiltrate and stop them, because that's just lowly "law enforcement" work.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC