Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Willow and Piper, attended school in Juneau for the second semester last year"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:21 PM
Original message
"Willow and Piper, attended school in Juneau for the second semester last year"
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 09:42 PM by rainbow4321
Hmmmm...says they were there so they could be with their mother while the legislature was in session. I assume by "last semester they mean January thru the end of the school year.

Going by Wiki, they start every year in January and this year, for the first time, the session was only 90 days instead of 120.

So going by the Post article, her and the kids should have been in Juneau. Notice the second article said that Bristol "transferred" FROM Wasilla schools in Dec 2007 and sent to Anchorage. WHY..if her mother was headed to Juneau with the other kids?? The NEW classmates say she was OUT of school for several months. Basically, she was MIA from Wasilla schools, from Anchorage schools....all while her siblings and mother are in Juneau??
Put together this timeline with the news from the NE that Bristol was kicked out of the household after she announced her pregnancy and sent to live with her aunt. Does this aunt live in Anchorage? Is this where they hid her? Yet she is NOW supposed to be only 5 months pregnant (given that, she would have gotten pregnant in, what, April??

-------------

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/01/AR2008090102998.html?hpid=topnews

Sarah Palin's mother said in an interview Sunday that Palin's two youngest girls, Willow and Piper, attended school in Juneau for the second semester last year when the legislature was in session to be near their mother. The baby was also with Palin.


--------------
http://www.zimbio.com/Bristol+Palin/articles/299/Timeline+Palin+Mystery+Pregnancy

The Governor's daughter "inexplicably" transferred in December 2007, the middle of her junior year. Arguably, Bristol may have had other issues that warranted sending her to a school that's 30 miles away in Anchorage, AK and under the Governor's watchful eye. But rumors in Anchorage began around this time. Are there any photos of Bristol Palin from December 2007- March 2008? Her new classmates report she was absent for several months "with mononucleosis." Rumors that Bristol put on weight - which doesnt normally occur with mono - not yet confirmed. But these excuses mimic the typical white, middle-class Protestant cover-up for a teen pregnancy... and who wouldn't sympathize with the poor parents?!



---------------

On edit:
Remember the myspace pics that had captions that had babydaddy's sister referring to Palin as "mommy in law" and Bristol as "sister in law"?? The baby looks no older than maybe a week old at the most, still being called "new" by the sister. That would be the week of April 18th. If Bristol GOT pregnant in April, she most likely didn't know she was pregant til her cycle didn't happen in May. What's up with everyone ALREADY calling the Palins' IN LAWS and it was clearly not even MAY yet??









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
morillon Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're exactly right, rainbow.
I think the Enquirer is feeding this out a bit at a time before dropping the big one, that Trig is actually Bristol's. As I was saying in another thread, taking Bristol out of school in response to her pregnancy only makes sense if you're talking about a pregnancy last fall, not this May. Why would you take a kid out of school a couple of weeks before the term is over? And that's assuming Bristol would even have known she was pregnant in May, which I doubt.

My theory about this whole crazy situation is that the fishy pregnancy story was a ploy to a) keep up the holier-than-thou family pretense and b) get Trig covered on the governor's health insurance policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. More inconsistancies
If your kid is SO sick with mono that she has to be out of school for 5 months..she is pretty frigging sick. WHY go to Juneau withOUT her?? I would not be leaving her bedside, never mind in being in another city than where she is! Per Palin's OWN mother, Palin and her 2 youngest kids were in Juneau, the kids in Juneau schools for the Spring 2008 semester. Bristol, however, had her car accident in WASILLA in Feb 2008 per the court records, in front of a medical clinic, when she and another teen's car collided. If she was NOT going to Wasilla schools, why was she back there? If she was SO sick, why was there not someone with her? And why not go to a doctor in Anchorage if she was indeed, headed to the medical clinic??
February '08 is when her mother and sisters were still in Juneau. AND we are to believe that sick-as-a-dog-out-of-school-for-5-months Bristol was allowed to drive from Anchorage to Wasilla by herself and back??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Bristol made the fist semester honor roll
had she not completed the term, she would not have made it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's pretty damn clear that their stories just don't add up. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hopefully the NE will do what the MSM refuses to do..
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 05:56 AM by rainbow4321
Dig up a timeline and hold Palin's feet to the fire. Palin's family may be the ones that do her in when all is said and done with their own quotes/timelines that don't add up to her bullshit stories.

I'm leaning towards 2 theories 1) Trig is Bristol's kid and her puffy look is just from being post partum 2)Trig is her kid and she is on her second pregnancy.


The AK mudflats blogger who first wrote about both mother and daughter being pregnant (the weekend before it hit the MSM) also had written that it was also being said locally at the time that Bristol and Levi had already gotten married---that she was shipped off to Idaho to get THAT part done. Conflicts with the NE story but adds an extra "hmmmmmmm.." to the myspace captions that say "mommy in law" and sister in law at least a month before the current "5 months pregnant timeline"--again, if she got preg. in April, she wouldn't know til May--so why refer to being in a married state in April when those pics look like they were taken (baby looking brand new).

On the "teens don't have Downs babies" front: Keep in mind that this diagnosis is coming from someone that has been caught in more lies than truths..someone who had no problem using this baby as a prop to hide her daughter's stomach that Friday, Saturday and Sunday before the news broke on Monday. Since the news broke, EVERY ONE started holding the baby...no longer needed as a prop to hide Bristol's belly. There are alot of other issues/diagnosis that can cause a baby to have a neuro problem at birth.
I get the feeling we have not seen how low Palin will stoop.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC