Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The militant uterus (Palin) wants the government to have control

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 11:23 AM
Original message
The militant uterus (Palin) wants the government to have control
over women's bodies and when this happens, women will no longer be free in the US. She and the republicans will have used the freedoms women (and men) fought and died for to create a base inequality for more than half of America's population. Make no mistake about it, pro or anti-abortion, this is about control over women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. I Wonder What Her True Position Is About Women In The Military
Many GOOPers have been against women serving...or doing so in any responsible position. What's Grandma Barracuda's position?

Also, what is her position about the large abuse of women...the high number of reported rapes and sexual abuse that came in the wake of the Iraq War for Profit? Well...I doubt we'll every know...unless we read our bibles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. We will probably not get to ask her these question because
to do so would be "sexist". It would be laughable if it were not so maddening. Great questions by the way for both repub candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. the so-called party dedictated to getting BIG government out of their lives
is oddly inconsistent. No regulations, free markets, less government, no taxes...on and on...but in areas of social control of the individual they flip-flop...suddenly its all control the uterus, criminalize the pot smoker, force everyone into endless unacceptable global conflicts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. They are great at legislating their views on individual behaviors,
but can ignore any moral dilemma that blocks monetary gains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. And the one issue voter rears its stupid head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Wow, so if I don't want the government to have the ultimate
control over women (the right to have the say over what they do with their reproductive organs), I and a millions of others are stupid. Believe me I have environmental, war-mongering, misuse of power and economic issues with this person, but I guess pro-choice is not of importance to you and therefore is "stupid".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Look everyone knows prolifers don't give a rat's ass about what happens to the kid after it's born
sooo so much for that "right to life." What about fucking quality of life? Guess that isn't an issue. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You are so right but how do we get this hypocrisy looked at for
what it is. (I think it is about putting personal and religious views into the laws of this country in an attempt to control women, but we can differ there, if you want, for the larger issue of quality of life.). It has already been shown that she vetoed several programs that would help "unwed mothers". How anyone who who has a thought at all for children can do this is beyond me. Plus mcsame voting against children's health care. Shameful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. The Uterus Militant. Tha'ts good. Also, Big Hair Triumphant.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Actually, I am from Texas and love big hair. Blessings Ann.
(Richards, of course.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC