Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

dumb question: if Cold War stand off could produce relative stability for decades why...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:10 PM
Original message
dumb question: if Cold War stand off could produce relative stability for decades why...
couldn't peaceful coexistence with Russia and China with defined spheres of influence lead to an equally or even more peaceful world?

We had an opportunity to do this once the Soviet Union collapsed and both China and Russia abandoned communism. Instead, we tried to make Rusia a Third World nation, and now we are trying to drink their milkshake in the Caspian Sea Basin.

For all of the stupidity and moral squalor of our invasion of Iraq, it probably doesn't risk igniting a world war like Bush's intrusion into Russia's tradition sphere of influence in Georgia and the attempt to deal Russia out of the income from piping Caspian Sea oil.

But if we weren't messing with that, we'd probably be ok with Russia.

Likewise, China seems to have outsmarted us by trying to gain economic assets from other countries with diplomacy and money whereas we just put a gun in people's faces.

Why couldn't we make a deal like the arms ratio deals before World War II? With spy satellites, they would be relatively easy to enforce.

Instead, we are headed down a path toward endless war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Military Industrial Complex owns our government
They own the press

They own the country

The last thing they want is an end to war

War is big business - always has been

War is a racket - always has been

Just ask Maj. Gen Smedley Butler

And I'd say ask JFK - but you can't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah, but the question has to be asked every once in a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I know - and it should be asked every day
Ike warned us and we didn't listen, er well my PARENTS didn't listen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I agree, I also believe Cheney and Bush's master/owners want high oil prices as well.
I believe this is their way of gouging the American People at least one last time by escalating the price of oil using instability as the motivation before renewable alternative energy takes off making the earth's societies less dependent on toxic fossil fuels.

Cheney and Bush along with their master owners know global warming climate change is for real and this is their cynical, Machiavellian strategy to enrich themselves while the dying old system of fossil fuel energy still dominates.

This isn't about the people, world peace or the public good so much as just more insatiable corporate/oligarch greed.

The only silver lining around this cloud being the greedy bastards are literally killing the goose which has laden the golden eggs for them for so long as they make alternative renewable forms of energy more cost effective to develop.

However I imagine they don't care, the people will feel the pain, not them and as the new companies emerge based on green energy, these same greedy fossil fuel corporations after fighting change for so long will use their extortion money gouged in the final years from the people to take over the green companies. I hope for the sake of poetic justice that's not allowed to happen although I feel somewhat less than hopeful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do the sphereies get a say in this set up?
Multiple centers of power are bound to clash at some point, since they require growth and expansion in order to survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. There wasn't stability during the cold war. Proxy countries all over the
world had wars over communism. Look at Africa, Asia & South America. It was awful and the only people who didn't get destroyed in those wars were first worlders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC