Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where's Edwards?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Resuscitated Ethics Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:01 AM
Original message
Where's Edwards?
I miss Edwards. I refuse to believe that his alleged dalliances are any worse than mccain ditching his crippled wife for a leggy beauty back in the day. I guess National Enquirer and Entertainment Tonight have the power to destroy politicians and dictate to DNC who is palatable based on whatever they feel like. Fuck that!!

I think Edwards is bright and his heart is in the right place and he should be at the convention. I miss him and refuse to judge him based on the scandal of the day. Fucking hypocrites piss me off. I still want John Edwards to participate in dismantling the cheney bush cabal.

Edwards for AG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. We are trying to get him out of prison. Even Dave Treen has ask Bush to pardon him
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 07:06 AM by RGBolen
I know people have approached Senator Obama about a pardon if Bush doesn't grant one. Never seems to get much support on DU.


Edited: Oh you meant John Edwards. Actually I did see that, didn't care, wanted to put my reply anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. John Edwards is in prison?
When did this happen and why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Edwin. Just a bit of thread hijacking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. haha, Edwin Edwards.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. i had to laugh at your original answer
EWE definitely deserves a pardon IMHO, unlike Libby or Rove or any other of the BFEE criminals. and i hadn't thought in ages about voting for EWE against Treen many moons ago. the storm has been on my mind and therefore NOLA has been on my mind today. so thanks for your original answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'll give the guy credit for one thing
He didn't make Elizabeth stand obediently by his side at a press conference like so many others do that get caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. Perhaps he tried to get her to do so, but she refused
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. You know...
I was wanting to see the press showing her throwing all his clothes out on the lawn on their 28,000 sq. ft. mansion :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. That looks like one of those componds that the FLDS people live at
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #29
78. And he's probably moved into the barn n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
50. Don't tell me those buildings are all connected together.
Talk about a fire hazard. It even looks like it could be in a flood zone. What do they need with all that sqaure footage anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #50
68. Don't know but I'll bet...
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 03:22 PM by DaveTheWave
...it's not used to help all those homeless people he said he cares so much about or the people who got foreclosed on with the sub-prime lenders he had ties with.

It's a status, ego, look what I got thing. I personally know a couple who are doing the same thing, more the husband's idea though. They just finished a house three times the size as the one they raised their kids in who are now all grown and gone.They didn't need a bigger house or even a new one. The wife tells everyone that she liked the old house better but the husband was so worried that other people wouldn't think or know how rich they are if they stayed in their old house that they bought 25 years ago when they were not. And not only that, he didn't want to buy a bigger house already built either because he has to tell everyone it was custom built for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. What is wrong with people?!!
So, John had ties with those sub-prime lenders? Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #70
74. You're right
Can't just pick on him when a lot of other democratic members of congress and the senate own a shit-load of Exxon and Halliburton stock

So they own stock in the very same companies they say they hate and they claim victimizes all poor Americans. So what eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #50
79. Maybe he needs places to hide his girlfriends
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
58. dude I'm amazed that you're able to get away with that little
bobble you have on your tag line.....

:~)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
61. and your bouncing boobs thing is great for women because....?
I can't take anything you say seriously with that kind of sexism.

Too bad I can't block it from my sight... oh wait, I can!!

Little red "x", here I come!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #61
81. It's a cartoon for cryin' out loud


:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Dearest repo....
I smell bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. dear George
I think I smell it too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resuscitated Ethics Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. Your own upper lip?
No BS, just appalled at the damaged goods. ALL politicians are damaged professional liars in some way or another-- John Edwards had such potential to really jail the bastards. I hate that Entertainment Tonight can bury someone that I had that much faith in--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. Where do you get that Edwards would jail corrupt people more than other AG possibilities?
He was NEVER a prosecutor, which many Senators were and he never headed an investigation in the Senate. He submitted no legislation that addressed either corruption though other Senators did.

The reason he is not there is that he is currently toxic - and would hurt the ticket. The ticket's success is more important than trying to help Edwards rehabilitate himself. If he is completely sincere on his causes, he needs to go and quietly work on those issues and only then try to return to the political stage. It is also not clear that all the shoes have dropped on this. If he used campaign money to pay her off or if the baby is his, he is likely politically dead forever - in the latter case it is not for having a child but for lying in his confession.

Not all politicians are liars - there are many that have long careers which they served with integrity. (To name a few - Kerry, Durbin, Feingold, Lautenberg are four that come to mind immediately - all with more progressive records than Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resuscitated Ethics Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Oh. That's where.
He really IS in the doghouse.

Thanks for the insight--another bubble burst. Sorry for swearing. I feel like I've lost a friend.

Obama-Biden 2008 and 2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #35
46. I'm sorry too for the unnessary curtness
I do feel really bad for the people who had come to really connect, admire and like the Edwards. In some way, the amount of video, stories and perceived closeness we can now get with the nominees does make us feel that we know them more than we likely do. Some will justify those feelings by being true to the way they portrayed themselves, but some won't.

The ideals that Edwards spoke of were ones that are could to hold to. There are other people, in politics or out, who live by those ideals. Whether Edwards was sincere or not, he likely pushed some people to care and act against poverty. Those people deserve enormous praise and they will find other leaders - if Edwards can't lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resuscitated Ethics Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #46
59. Very frustrating when enemy slime sticks -nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. first of all, his affair isn't alleged; he admitted it was true.
Secondly, he's persona non grata not because of the affair but because of the disgustingly selfish lies and for allegedly misusing campaign funds for his dear little mistress.

He's damaged goods. And he's done. There is NO chance that he'll be AG. Thankfully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't give 2-cents for Edwards. It's Elizabeth who needs
all of our support.

Edwards is a cad. It's unfathomable that he would carry on while Elizabeth is terminal with cancer. It's heartbreaking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. while i agree that what edwards did was unfathomable
it must be understood that john edwards is a human with very human traits. he f**ked up and admitted he f**ked up! it does not change that he would have been a very good president and could be a very good ag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Edwards made mistakes but he is not a murderer like the person
in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. exactly or any of the very unchristian like things he has done
this man has been the most unethical man ever in the white house (and that includes nixon)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
33. I think that paying off the mistress with campaign funds probably kills the AG
chances for him.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
36. !
:thumbsup: he f**ked up and admitted he f**ked up! it does not change that he would have been a very good president and could be a very good ag. :applause:

And no one had the right to drag his dirty laundry out in public! PTB just wanted to make sure that he was no longer a viable candidate EVER AGAIN! :grr:

Mission Accomplished! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. this is a very sad trend right now
no one has the right to privacy anymore. can you imagine the presidents we would not have if this was done throughout history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #43
64. I watched "The Contender" and "Primary Colors" the opening night of the Dem Convention
and thought about exactly that! Two good movies, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. Edwards entered into his campaign for President knowing that he had committed adultery against
his much-beloved cancer-stricken wife and mother of this children.
I contributed to his campaign. I supported his candidacy.
His judgment is seriously impaired if he thought he could have won the presidency without
this secret coming out.

It's not about his sexual morals or lack thereof.

It's about the fact that John Edwards was willing to imperil the entire country in order to satisfy his personal ambition.

End of story.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueknight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. i was a edwards fan,
but no more. what he has done,is one of the lowest things he could do. he is a POS imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
42. ditto and I was his biggest fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
57. exactly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. The NC delegation is paying for Edwards actions. There's a front page article
in our local Raleigh paper today about how they've been put in the nosebleed section, sandwiched between
the delegation from Texas and Arizona! Ouch! Plus, the delegates have been relegated to a suburban
hotel--way out of town. :(

Very different treatment from 2004.


http://www.newsobserver.com/print/wednesday/front/story/1195769.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
52. Too bad the NC delegates have to be treated like red-haired step-children.
Or like the poor country cousin whose mom married beneath her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. Edwards is radioactive.
Politically speaking, he has been buried somewhere in Nevada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
16. i don't hate the guy, but he has no one to blame but his penis... n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
53. The Eenis! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #53
62. it's taken down many a man, and some women. n/t...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
17. He WAS there - they just couldn't get him out of the hotel room
said he had an old friend in from out of town or something.... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
18. In the doghouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. For the political cartoon showing Edwards in the doghouse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Perfect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. That ran in our local Raleigh paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
24. He is exacly where he belongs
Out of sight, so that we can focus on Obama and McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
26. You're adorable!
Have a cookie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
27. Your OP is a full tilt joke
If hypocrites piss you off, then you should be pissed off at John Edwards, who spent the Primary pontificating about how his 'Southern Baptist values' are an unmovable part of him, and because of that he sees marriage as a holy Sacrament, and so he just had to oppose marriage equality, you see, because it is only for 'one man and one woman' according to God.
Tell me what could be more hypocritical than that? Claiming fidelity and sanctimony in order to stand against a minority fighting for equal rights?
He stood on a high horse and lied through his teeth, with his wife there to help sell the lie, and the lies he told were told at the expense of others, who were not liars and cheats and defrauders of funds.
The hypocrite in question is John Edwards, who used good GLBT Americans as a scapegoat for his own lack of decency toward his sick wife and his family, not to mention his so called 'faith'.
It is not the sex, it is the lies, and the presenting of himself and his wife as some holy alliance of purity which must be protected from the awaful gays, while he was humping whoever he felt like, no thought to home and hearth. A liar. A hypocrite.
You should be pissed off at John Edwards and his needful wife or beard or what ever the hell she is to him. A prop? A servant? Clearly the one thing she is not is soulmate. A marriage of convenience presented as divine and respect demaned for that scam at the expense of real couples. They are fakes of the first degree, willing to burn other people to uphold a lie.
They could consider making apologies and attempting to mend the damage done, but they will not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. One man and two women.
So he was a little off on the math. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. And the truthfulness
And he, of his own free choice, made questions about legal issues into religious issues, allegedly because he was so very moral and traditional in his views on marriage. He did that freely. He passed the buck. He said 'those folks are bad 'cause they have a beer at dinner' while he was sucking back a fifth of gin, so that no one would question his drinking.
He used good GLBT families as cover for his own flaws, and he dared to do so in the name of God, no less. One of the most craven and self serving things I have ever seen out of anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. I never trusted him.
Elizabeth always seemed more like the real deal to me. She seems to speak from a moral core, whereas John is always making a political calculation and re-inventing himself. A lot of people in Wisconsin chose Edwards early on, and they were shocked when Feingold pointed out that Edwards was just taking on all the positions that he (Feingold) had taken four years ago when they were less popular. Feingold has no need to re-invent himself as he gets things right the first time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. "They"? Elizabeth did nothing wrong
Please don't blame the wife for the sins of the husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. She's getting pounded for her knowledge of the affair, I read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Diadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. I read her diary entry responses at Kos yesterday.
Some were pretty hard on her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #44
60. Yes they were
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
49. When he was doing his holy high horse on GLBT equality
Elizabeth knew it was a steaming pile of crap, not just a lie, but a lie told against others to enhance themselves. Bearing false witness while claiming to be too Baptist to live. She knew and she said nothing. He should have kept his mouth shut about his 'values' knowing he was doing what he was doing. And she should have called him on it.
They are free to rectify the situation via apology, truth telling and transfering of funds. Otherwise, I'm calling it as I see it. It took two to tell that lie, and she told it. For personal gain, knowing it was harmful to others. Good people don't do that. They just don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
39. Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
40. Probably out gettin' some.
And trying to figure whose donation money he can funnel to cover his tracks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Edwards new song....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
45. McCain ditched his wife several decades ago, Edwards is fresh news
You want this convention about Obama or about what Edwards did. Because if Edwards showed that's what it would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwertyMike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
47. Who cares?
He's a fuckin prick
He almost fooled me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
48. What a terrific idea
Appoint Edwards as the chief law enforcement officer of the United States...

He is busy hiding his mistress all over the place and is paying off his #1 aid to say the baby is really his... He is dancing so fast it is comical. He was my choice and he made me a fool for supporting him. I would be quite irritated if Obama appointed him in any cabinet post.

Edwards is now political toxic waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukkha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
51. not welcome to the party anymore
he wore out his welcome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #51
71. Speak for yourself. I still believe in Edwards' policies and so
do most Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nipper1959 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
54. who cares???
If you haven't noticed there is an election campaign in process that does not include Mr. Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nipper1959 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
55. who cares???
If you haven't noticed there is an election campaign in process that does not include Mr. Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
63. All I want is my hard earned money back that I donated to him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
65. He's probably home, doing the right thing, fixing his marriage.
Let him have his time and space. He'll come back, when he comes back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
66. Where's your profile?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resuscitated Ethics Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. profiles are creepy but for you I updated.
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 02:34 PM by repo
I appreciate the troll watch and understand a low post number is a prime red flag. I don't have the time or desire to pad--

Edwards used to be the man-- hard to fathom the for-shitness that resulted. I purposely avoided the Enquirer analysis but there have been a few thoughtful responses here that I am still wrapping my pea brain around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #67
75. Your profile says you signed up a few weeks ago but your account says it began in 2006?
So which is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resuscitated Ethics Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #75
80. It's both
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 05:54 PM by repo
Haven't felt this loved since I tried to get a lighter on a USAir flight back in my smoking days.

I'll do my best McCain: signed up a few years ago, lapsed, got a new password a few weeks ago so I could brag on my smoking victory and comment on the New Yorker hatred that was trolling through the site I was checking out every few weeks.

One day I'll donate so I can post on the ex smokers forum, too broke now

(edited by repo to cover up knee-jerk insults at the troll police, who despite my present discomfort I appreciate their diligence. where were you during the New Yorker slam dance?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #80
82. Well you edited your profile at least.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resuscitated Ethics Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #82
83. peace
Edited on Thu Aug-28-08 09:48 AM by repo
thanks for noticing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
69. Edwards went up against the status quo and they annihilated him because of it.
Why does anyone think anything is going to change in '09 when those mo fos are the ones who are really running the entire country. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. Edwards never went against the status quo
other than in words in a campaign. There are very few politician that do - but give me ONE example of anything Edwards did in the Senate that went against the status quo. There are Senators who do - like:

Feingold, who stood alone against the Patriot act, who introduced legislation to censure Bush (co-sponsored by just Boxer, Harkin, and Kerry), and who with Kerry fought for a deadline to get out of Iraq

Wellstone, who was the true populist that Edwards wasn't, who with Kerry sponsored the Clean Money Clean elections bill that would have been REAL campaign finance reform

Boxer, who challenged Ohio's electoral votes in 2004 to get the voting irregularities in the Congressional record.

Kerry, who stood against Nixon as a brave 27 year old, who investigated the illegal arming of the Contras, and against the will of all the powers that be pursued his investigation of BCCI.

These are people who took real risks and made serious long term actions that were not popular, but they were right.

Edwards is in trouble now because he carried on a long term affair, while pretending to be the perfect husband to a woman dealing with cancer. It also seems likely he lied in his confession. It is not likely he told EE before the official start of the campaign as Hunter was with him in New Orleans. It is also still not clear if campaign money was misused. That is why he is in trouble - no conspiracy theory is needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. Edwards didn't get a chance to go up against the status quo-they made sure of it by ignoring
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 04:19 PM by TheGoldenRule
him during the primaries and by making sure he was kicked to the curb as fast as possible. But he would have kicked their butts if he'd had the chance! It was obvious that the status quo/powers that be were afraid of him, because the public adored both John and ELizabeth which meant he had a good shot at winning the White House. Believe what you will, but I am sure Edwards was a HUGE threat and they took him out.

Also, most people don't give a damn about Edwards affair. All we've seen is just a bunch of pot stirring by the powers that be/media to make Edwards look as bad as possible. They did the same thing to Clinton, which was total bullshit too. Edwards & Clinton only really hurt themselves and their families, but the media had to turn it into a circus because it's a huge money maker for them, plus it's a way to control public opinion. The campaign money hoopla is just more of the same.

Meanwhile, the powers that be are stealing everything that isn't nailed down from the American people. Which goes unreported by the corporate media.

So tell me, which is the bigger crime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #73
77. There are many greater crimes - in fact there may not even be a crime here
What I don't buy is that the media worked against Edwards - he was one of their favorites in 2004, getting far more press than his numbers would have indicated. In fact the week before he was pretty much mathematically eliminated the NYT had an op-ed saying the Democrat would be "John", either Kerry or Edwards and then made the case for Edwards. In fact, Kerry had won 16 caucuses/primaries and Edwards 1 - Kerry was also ahead by double digits in all the states of the following week.

In 2005 and 2006, he was treated as one of the three big choices. That continued into 2007, it decreased only as his support decreased. He became an unlikely winner as soon as he lost Iowa, where he had spent a HUGE amount of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
76. Edwards talked a good game
And he is Hollywood Presidential as all get out, no surprise he hoodwinked so many. However, even before the affair, lots of us were sceptical--he didn't just vote for the war in Iraq, he cosponsored the bill! Then he ran as anti-war. He voted for the punitive bankruptcy bill, then ran as a friend of the poor. On and on, his record and his rhetoric failed to align. Even knowing this, I wanted him to succeed in bringing his new-found populist message to the forefront. I wanted to believe that even though he was an obvious opportunist, he could lead in a progressive way (I don't believe Presidents need to actually believe in their platforms, just get congress and the people to get behind it). Anyway, the whole affair thing blew up the entire thing--he can't lead now, he really has no past record to redeem himself. He's blown his chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #76
84. I can't imagine Edwards getting elected anywhere, anyhow.
And to all the Edwards apologists on this thread, put yourself in Elizabeth's place, for just one day and ponder for a moment how she feels.

Heck of a job, Johnny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC