Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. MILITARY TO BUSH: WE WILL NOT ALLOW A WAR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:28 PM
Original message
U.S. MILITARY TO BUSH: WE WILL NOT ALLOW A WAR
http://www.worldreports.org./news/162_u.s._military_to_bush_we_will_not_allow_a_war_

Anybody get this in their mail my You tubers sent it to me
On one hand it is far fetched but then looking at actions in the past and how our Military is breaking away such as the Intel reports not saying Iran has WMD it makes me wonder what is going on especially when AirForce Generals are committing suicide and Admiral Fallon forced resignation ...I have always felt the Pentagon is getting fed up with the Bush Cheney show
snip...

The Pentagon has informed President Bush and his demoniac father that THE U.S. MILITARY WILL NOT ALLOW A WAR OVER THE MONEY THAT HE AND HIS CRIMINALIST ASSOCIATES HAVE STOLEN. Therefore, the US military have signalled to the White House that they will adhere to their oath of office and will disobey any instructions from the Commander in Chief to go to war.

• The Pentagon has further demanded that PRESIDENT BUSH MUST RELEASE THE GLOBAL SETTLEMENT FUNDS ON TUESDAY THE 19TH AUGUST 2008, including of course the $87 billion demanded by Mr V. Putin, to which he is entitled under the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols (taking proper account of the compound interest). 'VERY SHARP' LANGUAGE WAS USED.

• Bush 41, the most wanted and dangerous criminal in the world, again stated on 18th August that 'the money belongs to me and I will not release it'. He's a private citizen.

• The U.S. military now face the following situation. Since they have told the President in so many words that they will DISOBEY ANY ORDERS THAT THE PRESIDENT MAY ISSUE TO START WAR WITH RUSSIA, IN ORDER TO OBFUSCATE AND COVER UP HIS OWN CRIMINALITY, they will be faced with NO CHOICE on Tuesday, if this mad President refuses to comply forthwith and to release the overdue Settlements, but to ARREST THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES on charges of gross treason and endangering the peace and stability of the whole world because of his avarice.

•FACT: The US military have all taken a Constitutional Oath to uphold, defend and preserve the Constitution of the United States. Since the President of the United States is, and will be judged by the military to be, issuing an unlawful order, or in refusing to implement the Settlements today will be acting unlawfully (which of course he does every day), it will be and is, the RESPONSIBILITY of the US military to remove the President from office. Likewise, if the Vice President of the United States persists, along with 'Paulson', Bernanke, Kohn and Greenspan in frustrating the Settlements through fraudulent operations as they are STILL currently doing, these operatives will need to be removed as well. But the military will concentrate on the White House.
more...
Thoughts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. A) WTF?. . . . . B) That was last Tuesday. . . . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm past turning blue, holding my breath, for somebody to arrest Bush and Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suji to Seoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. Hey. . .impeachment's off the table, right Nancy?
We didn't put in a democratic majority to end the war and impeach the bastard. . .we did it to make a BIGGER majority in the House and Senate.

For God sake's, they impeached Clinton over a blow job!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. My thought is I would tell whoever wrote this that their tin hat isn't doing the job.
Perhaps a propeller beanie would work better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Complete bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. What are "THE GLOBAL SETTLEMENT FUNDS"
Do you know what this is referring to?

Did you look into the quote from Bush Sr. "stated on 18th August that 'the money belongs to me and I will not release it'." and what THAT's referring to?

Curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Ok here is the Global Settlement googled its concerning
Edited on Sun Aug-24-08 06:51 PM by lovuian
the The Global Settlement was an enforcement agreement reached on April 23, 2003 between the SEC, NASD, NYSE, and ten of the United States's largest investment firms to address issues of conflict of interest within their businesses<1>
Contents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_settlement

Was Russia owed money and not paid????
and Bush and Cheney confiscated it...was Russia owed money

http://www.finra.org/RegulatoryEnforcement/FINRAEnforcementMarketRegulation/GlobalSettlement/index.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would love to know the seriousness of this...
if its bs, great. If there is any truth to it, it needs investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thats where I'm at if anybody has some info on this I would
greatly appreciate it

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarthDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Um

No, this isn't to be taken seriously. Just more Trilateral Commission-style nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah, right
And this "publication" can't afford better than a "buy this now" type template for their releases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. While I appreciate the sentiments ....
The honesty of this story is highly questionable ...

Why subject us to this as if it were true ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. if you read my post I definitely said I was not sure of the
source and to read with Caution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well, then...
I think this answers the question "What ever happened to all those NESARA folks?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. I want to know more about this Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols
and Wanta
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Russia has lost plenty of money with our invasion. They had existing contracts when we went in.
Edited on Sun Aug-24-08 10:46 PM by higher class
Right after, they were on the list of non-coalition partners along with France.

Then we started making promises and agreements?

Here's a memory jog from 2003. (See about nine lines down.)

There is a lot of PNAC failure all over the face of Iraq. Perhaps PNAC people didn't keep a promise to Russia of untold profits with PNAC in charge?

The image of Putin and Bush with George's shocked look while 'listening' to Putin (within the last two weeks) - might be an indication that PNAC is in deep doo-doo, meaning 'what' for us?

One thing PNAC probably considered a given is military cooperation.

PNAC disbanding is a curiosity. A legal shedding?

Global settlements? Lots of jobs out there. The two words don't seem to be in the law dictionaries I checked. Means 'global' plus 'settlement' with some firms using it with caps?

Wiki comes through again with something. And a fun trail. At the bottom - a link to scandals - which goes to Google - one of the entries is from 2003 (named above) -

http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2003/12/12/bush_defends_plan_on_iraq_contracts?mode=PF

Which led me here:

http://en.rian.ru/business/20080607/109477398.html

With this fun sentence?

"The deal Russia's deal) for both stages (of oil extraction) has been signed for 23 years, but was frozen in 2002."

I'll bet the internet is full of paths. It doesn't take long to imagine all the meetings and deals between the U.S. and Russia over Iraq and the money involved. Obviuosly, there may not be that much money to pay up on some deals? Global settlement teams are not settling things satisfactorily.

Now that may be a naive look at it and not enough for a good movie, but way too much for reality.

How much debt is Russia carrying of ours? How much did they take a loss on in Iraq?

Is Cheney out of sight tryhing to figure it out?

But wait, Ms Rice has a degree in this. Can she save Cheney, Baker, Bush both, the barons?

I vote that the Generals may know a thing or two about the disappeared money and the owed money?

Are we going to survive the PNAC team? and their barons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Thanks Higher class for the research
Its a mystery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. Wow, the more I dig into this, the stranger it becomes.
Do a google search of "Executive Order Wanta-Reagan-Mitterrand" and all kinds of interesting and mindboggling links come up. 90% of it is probably pure trash, but if 10% is true, this is pretty big stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. Well....The Congress is liable too. You're only talking about + or - 450 people.
Witnesses to a crime and saluting the criminal to continue the crimes is not fair justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
20. Career officers don't have the guts to do this.
The Pentagon's prevailing culture has had more than forty years or so to ensure that only ass-kissing perfumed princes reach the general officer class.

To expect them to stand up for anything more than their careers, pensions, and post-service corporate board memberships is ridiculous.

If there are any patriots in that class, they are few and far between and hiding deep in the closet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
21. Excuse me, but WTF?
I don't understand what they're talking about. I suppose this will require some time with the google to untangle the strands of truth from the garbage. Time which I don't have at the moment, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldskool Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
22. Alot of "conspiracy theories" are not
theories.If there is documentation it is a fact,therefor it is
a conspiracy. As far as Russia and Georgia a congressman tried
to warn people in 2002 about it. Wake up people!! KNOW THE
FACTS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC