Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain is in favor of taxing the rich, NOT the poor.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 07:30 PM
Original message
McCain is in favor of taxing the rich, NOT the poor.
n the interview, McCain did not offer an alternate number, but had a new answer ready.
I define rich in other ways besides income,” he said. “Some people are wealthy and rich in their lives and their children and their ability to educate them. Others are poor if they’re billionaires.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080821/pl_politico/12685;_ylt=AqNbpagxTivb2AwXfTxEvCxh24cA

It all makes sense, now. That's why McCain and the GOP give taxpayer dollars to those poor billionaires. That's why only the "rich" have to give a child to die in wars to make the 'poor' safer.

He's such an enlightened saint! Poor Saint John of the Seven Houses. Ave. Poor Cindy, the Martyr of Bud. Ave.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. yep.
unfortunately that's how republicans are. take care of the rich and screw the little guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am rich!
I am rich in good friends, good family, a pretty-decent job, my perspective on life, my intelligence.

In the things that matter in this world, though, I'm seem to be lacking. I'm not quite as poor as a church mouse, but certainly poor enough to be wondering how I'm going to get by for very long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I hear you, cousin.
:hug:

I've already outlived my father by more than 3 years ... and have about the same 'wealth' he had. He served in WW2 in the Pacific. I served in Viet Nam. At least I've been able to live long enough to collect Social Security. He didn't. Neither did his father.

Yet I regard myself as a "success" ... never selling out my human values and ethical principles and having learned to become a better human being with each year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curious one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. He is an unhappy man who envies the regular guy. He might have been happier
with his first wife than with Cindy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. He sought pleasure, not happiness.
Happiness is not something one finds. It's something one chooses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodyM Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Try to pay the grocery
bill with that “rich in other ways” and see how far you get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Obviously, McCain thinks we 'wealthy' folks can eat our educated children.
Edited on Sat Aug-23-08 08:45 PM by TahitiNut
And drink the milk of human kindness.

It should be noted that "Third World Social Security" is having enough children and hoping the at least one survives and is able to care for the aged parents.

McCain seems to think that's a great idea.

The public must've been smarter in the 30s than we are now. They UNDERSTOOD that, as a nation, we'd be far better off if we ALL did the best we could to make it possible for our children to become even better at earning a living than we were ... and if we left them with a world where labor was valued and working conditions were better that EVERYONE would win.

Today, even on DU, I see folks that just don't fucking understand that children and grandchidren have ALWAYS taken care of the elders. It's a parent's job to INVEST in their children, NOT their own old age!!! That's called a win-win.

Thus, Social Security is built upon the Social Responsibility of investing in ALL our children, education, health care, safe work environments, a larger 'middle class' ... and that it's a "Pay It Forward" deal. People who have the delusion that feeding the Greater Fools of the secondary market for corporate equities is somehow a wise choice are total imbeciles ... or greed-obsessed freaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC