Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reflections on Leaving the Party by Susan Eisenhower

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 12:31 PM
Original message
Reflections on Leaving the Party by Susan Eisenhower
I have decided I can no longer be a registered Republican. For the first time in my life I announced my support for a Democratic candidate for the presidency, in February of this year. This was not an endorsement of the Democratic platform, nor was it a slap in the face to the Republican Party. It was an expression of support specifically for Senator Barack Obama. I had always intended to go back to party ranks after the election and work with my many dedicated friends and colleagues to help reshape the GOP, especially in the foreign-policy arena. But I now know I will be more effective focusing on our national and international problems than I will be in trying to reinvigorate a political organization that has already consumed nearly all of its moderate “seed corn.” And now, as the party threatens to trivialize what promised to be a serious debate on our future direction, it will alienate many young people who might have come into party ranks.

My decision came at the end of last week when it was demonstrated to the nation that McCain and this Bush White House have learned little in the last five years. They mishandled what became a crisis in the Caucusus, and this has undermined U.S. national security. At the same time, the McCain camp appears to be comfortable with running an unworthy Karl Rove–style political campaign. Will the McCain operation, and its sponsors, do anything to win?

This week, I changed my registration from Republican to independent. The two political parties as they exist today, and the partisanship that they foster, reflect the many fights of the cold war, the Vietnam era, the post–cold war and the 9/11 periods. Today we are in a different place altogether, where our security as a nation is challenged not just from abroad but also close to home. The energy, health-care and financial crises threaten our national prosperity and well-being, just as surely as any confrontation overseas or an attack by radical terrorists.

http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=19618
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R! Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick
:kick: This should be published "Big Time" as cheney would say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnlal Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. So everything up to now was OK?
She got through Nixon, Reagan, and the two Bushes, and only NOW realizes that there's something wrong with the GOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. i think that's true of a lotta lotta people
i'm still unable to talk politics with my sister or brother - though i might find out by now that they've wised up. as late as a couple of years ago, nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Uh oh. Ike's grandaughter.
This is NOT good for the repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wow......
Maybe this will wake up the "true Republicans" who have simply fallen in lock-step with voting their party line, regardless of what despicable clod they put up on the stump.

Susan states exactly why their party is crumbling.....because of the neo-con take-over by a few power-hungry slime balls without consciences. Ike did try to warn us about them. He saw them plotting their greedy plans even way back then.

The Dems need some of the Republicans to join them if we are ever to rid ourselves of BFEE & the Darth/Rummy/Rice gang.

But is it too late? Will we EVER be rid of this cabal? Will Obama ever be allowed to take office? :hide:

I pray he will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. i like that republicans are giving up the party right and left
and i love it when they give their reasons publicly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. The "Silent Majority"
I've met a lot of what I'm calling "recovering" Republicans who will be voting for Senator Obama this year for reasons not unlike Ms. Eisenhower. The political dynamic has shifted...many Independents in 2000 and 2004 have moved over to the Democratic side and there are many former Repugnicans who now are claiming to be Independent.

It would be great if the DNC can come out with a commercial featuring Ms. Eisenhower, Ron Reagan and Susan Ford (I think she's also supporting Senator Obama). Ya know, I get this sneaking suspicion that one of the boooosh twins, if not both, may be voting Democratic as well.

I'll be curious if the corporate media gives any light to Ms. Eisenhower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. Looks like the grown ups may leave the republican bratty-baby party
I sure hope so.. I would like nothing better than to see the republican party forever split... wacky religious nuts on one side and greedy warmongering money-grubbers on the other side..

They really NEED to split into two distinct parties.. The two groups have nothing in common except for their fear of "darker people".... and that distinction is even going away as their children reject those old ideas..


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Except that a lot of the "wacky religious nuts"
Are _also_ "greedy warmongering money-grubbers".

Membership in one set does not preclude membership in the other, in fact I think it encourages it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. Didn't the Eisenhowers defect from the Republican Party....
when Kerry ran in 2004? I swear I remember reading that somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, CatWoman.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. Eisenhower Republicans...
If they were still running the opposition party the country would be much better off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glenda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
16. Washington Post: "Why I'm Backing Obama"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/01/AR2008020102621.html

By Susan Eisenhower
Saturday, February 2, 2008

Forty-seven years ago, my grandfather Dwight D. Eisenhower bid farewell to a nation he had served for more than five decades. In his televised address, Ike famously coined the term "military-industrial complex," and he offered advice that is still relevant today. "As we peer into society's future," he said, we "must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow."

Today we are engaged in a debate about these very issues. Deep in America's heart, I believe, is the nagging fear that our best years as a nation may be over. We are disliked overseas and feel insecure at home. We watch as our federal budget hemorrhages red ink and our civil liberties are eroded. Crises in energy, health care and education threaten our way of life and our ability to compete internationally. There are also the issues of a costly, unpopular war; a long-neglected infrastructure; and an aging and increasingly needy population.

I am not alone in worrying that my generation will fail to do what my grandfather's did so well: Leave America a better, stronger place than the one it found.

Given the magnitude of these issues and the cost of addressing them, our next president must be able to bring about a sense of national unity and change. As we no longer have the financial resources to address all these problems comprehensively and simultaneously, setting priorities will be essential. With hard work, much can be done.

The biggest barrier to rolling up our sleeves and preparing for a better future is our own apathy, fear or immobility. We have been living in a zero-sum political environment where all heads have been lowered to avert being lopped off by angry, noisy extremists. I am convinced that Barack Obama is the one presidential candidate today who can encourage ordinary Americans to stand straight again; he is a man who can salve our national wounds and both inspire and pursue genuine bipartisan cooperation. Just as important, Obama can assure the world and Americans that this great nation's impulses are still free, open, fair and broad-minded.

No measures to avert the serious, looming consequences can be taken without this sense of renewal. Uncommon political courage will be required. Yet this courage can be summoned only if something profoundly different transpires. Putting America first -- ahead of our own selfish interests -- must be our national priority if we are to retain our capacity to lead.

The last time the United States had an open election was 1952. My grandfather was pursued by both political parties and eventually became the Republican nominee. Despite being a charismatic war hero, he did not have an easy ride to the nomination. He went on to win the presidency -- with the indispensable help of a "Democrats for Eisenhower" movement. These crossover voters were attracted by his pledge to bring change to Washington and by the prospect that he would unify the nation.

It is in this great tradition of crossover voters that I support Barack Obama's candidacy for president. If the Democratic Party chooses Obama as its candidate, this lifelong Republican will work to get him elected and encourage him to seek strategic solutions to meet America's greatest challenges. To be successful, our president will need bipartisan help.


Given Obama's support among young people, I believe that he will be most invested in defending the interests of these rising generations and, therefore, the long-term interests of this nation as a whole. Without his leadership, our children and grandchildren are at risk of growing older in a marginalized country that is left to its anger and divisions. Such an outcome would be an unacceptable legacy for any great nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC