Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harry Reid "reconsidering" GOP Convention Speaker Lieberman's position in Democratic Party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:34 PM
Original message
Harry Reid "reconsidering" GOP Convention Speaker Lieberman's position in Democratic Party
Reid Reconsidering Lieberman's Position In Dem Party



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/20/reid-taking-another-look_n_120148.html

Senator Joseph Lieberman's decision to speak at the upcoming Republican National Convention is being met with deep consternation among Democrats and is compelling leadership to reassess his political assignments and future within the party.

"Majority Leader Harry Reid has indicated that he will take another look at things after the election specifically regarding committee assignments," said a well-connected Hill aide.

It has long been expected that Connecticut Independent Democrat's antics and surrogacy on behalf of John McCain would endanger his standing among Democrats. But for the most part, Reid and company have shied away from discussing whether Lieberman would retain his chairmanship for the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Asked in May if Lieberman's position was at risk, the Senate Majority Leader said "no." Later he said, without elaboration, that such a scenario was possible but very unlikely.

"He is non-committal now, said the Hill aide on Wednesday, describing it as a shift towards a more hard line stance. "He is going to take a look at things after the election."

The possibility that Lieberman would address the GOP convention has been kicked around for weeks. Democratic activists have responded by pinning for the party to kick its 2000 vice presidential nominee out of the caucus. But with the party's Senate majority at a scant one vote, it seemed nearly impossible that they would sever ties. And so, leadership, advisers, and former Lieberman supporters have been forced to swallow their pride and stomach his behavior.

"The party is clearly in a tough place," said Steve Rabinowitz, a long time Democratic media consultant. "I used to personally be there. It was a dilemma for me when Joe lost his primary for Senate and I am a big partisan Democrat. But I sucked it up and pretended to support him in the general election and he promised a million times that he would caucus with the Democrats that he would stay a Democrat. This thing, that he is supporting McCain because he is a friend -- there are a million Senators who are good best friends and drinking buddies with folks form the other side of the aisle -- they never endorse them for president, campaign for them, and trash their opponents. He really lost me with the McCain endorsement. And now I am done personally."

On Wednesday it was reported that Lieberman would be speaking at the GOP convention on Monday evening -- on the first day, but not in the most prestigious slot. The Senator is expected to continue his sharp advocacy on behalf of McCain. Whether he attacks Barack Obama's patriotism, which he has done in the past, could go a long way in determining how the Democratic Party handles the situation going forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Duh! Ya think????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Harry's like an action figure who SNAPS INTO ACTION...eh, who am I kidding?
:rofl:

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. That man has the backbone of a
...boneless chicken.

Floppin around all over the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Harry Reid = Captain Obvious

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. indeed


Don't ponder too hard now, ya'hear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Letting him squirm is enjoyable, too
As long as he get's his final comeuppance..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. What are you gonna do, Harry? Send him to bed with no supper?
Deny him his weekly allowance? Not let him watch TV? Put him over your knee and spank him?

"Reconsidering" his position, Harry?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. this little snip is interesting
"It has long been expected that Connecticut Independent Democrat's antics and surrogacy on behalf of John McCain would endanger his standing among Democrats. But for the most part, Reid and company have shied away from discussing whether Lieberman would retain his chairmanship for the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Asked in May if Lieberman's position was at risk, the Senate Majority Leader said "no." Later he said, without elaboration, that such a scenario was possible but very unlikely".

"He is non-committal now, said the Hill aide on Wednesday, describing it as a shift towards a more hard line stance. "He is going to take a look at things after the election."



Reid will look at things after the election???? what else is new? knuckle dragging again and again unbelieveable crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Doesn't his caucusing with the Dems..
give them control of the Senate? Not that it really matters..but, I had thought that was the reason for his keeping his position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It won't matter after November 4th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. no it won't..
which is I guess why Harry wants to wait till after the election. I really don't know how much of a difference having a one vote majority means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Who thinks Lieberman will resign if Dems sweep?
He can make money lobbying and cash in, rather than being a leper in the senate (where Dems won't touch him and, since they will no longer have a use for him, neither will Republicans)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I hope not, because I'm going to love bashing him...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terranist Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Consider stepping aside as Senate Majority Leader and handing it to someone else...
Then I think that said individual could deal with Lieberman quite well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Do you know what ..
difference it would make, if any, if the Dems lost the majority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terranist Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I accurately predicted the difference it would make with them having the majority
However I think they'll pick up enough senators to quite safely give Lieberman the boot, and Connecticut voters will do that for good in 2012 I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. yeah but that's then..
not now. I seem to recall petitions running around regarding removing Lieberman from chairing those committees, but I've never heard any explanation of what would happen if the one vote majority was no more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terranist Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. The Senate is in session for like 2 months more
And they have gotten jack crap done for 2 years of majority rule. I don't think it matters if they can get majority back after 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Majority rule by one vote..
Lieberman's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terranist Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. After the election it wont matter will it
And if they lose the majority for 2 months no big deal. They don't act like they're the majority now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I guess I just don't get it...
I don't understand how it is the Democrats pass legislation with Lieberman as the tie-breaker. And if it weren't Lieberman wouldn't it be Dick Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terranist Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I can't remember anything important that passed by a single vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. exactly...
even if, by some miracle, all the Democrats stuck together they still wouldn't win if Lieberman were the deciding vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. gee... this is a Reallll tough one...
:sarcasm:

Holy shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. SHHHHHH! His hand on his chin means he's THINKING, and we don't want to DISTURB him
:rofl:

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Serious question
did they honestly think that photo would compel folks to believe this shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Seriously, who knows?
Did anyone in their right mind think that we would elect Speaker Pelosi so that she would consistently and unrelentingly tell us that impeachment was "off the table?"

I think we got HOPEFUL, which is OK, and we elected people who are not up to the task.

I might be right, I might be wrong. I think I nailed it.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. no, you did... I'm just beside myself on this
it's all so... well.... I'm speechless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. The day after he speaks at that convention
he should be removed from every Committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. And every pet project should be redlined out of the next budget. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. And we wonder why people consider Democrats weak.
What is wrong with a party which produces complete fucking assholes like Zell Miller and Joe Lieberman?

It's because the DNC breaks too few kneecaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
31. Hey! Joe gave $100k to the DSCC last week.
He bought his chairmanship. Fair and square.

Think Shoomer will return it? Not a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I think he's hedging his bets
Better to be hated on the inside than ignored on the outside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
34. Oh for crissake, just boot his sorry out. We have a binding resolution...
That says the Dems are still the majority until the next session which is in 2009. Kicking Lieberman out wouldn't make any difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC