Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elaine's still giving it all for DADT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 10:31 AM
Original message
Elaine's still giving it all for DADT
by: Pam Spaulding
Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 11:00:00 AM EDT



Will the http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=6237">doyenne of discrimination, Elaine 'forcible sodomy' Donnelly, of the The Center for Military Readiness, ever realize what http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=6237">a fool she made of herself during the recent Armed Services personnel subcommittee hearing?

She forges on, oblivious to the fact that her unhinged testimony managed to get a write up in the http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=6243">WaPo and a scorch by http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=6307">The Daily Show. In a http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-oped0814gayaug14,0,5487863.story">Chicago Tribune op-ed, she paints a horrifying picture of life in the military if Don't Ask, Don't Tell is repealed.

This would be tantamount to forcing female soldiers to cohabit with men at all times, regardless of the impact on discipline and morale. Stated in gender-neutral terms, in conditions of "forced intimacy," people will be exposed to people who may be sexually attracted to them. Sexual tension of any kind is inherently disruptive, but those affected would have no recourse, short of leaving or avoiding the military altogether.

The military does not do things halfway. Following historic precedent, officials will issue orders giving special, unprecedented rights to professed homosexuals, and enforce a corollary policy of "zero tolerance" of anyone who disagrees. Complaints about inappropriate, passive or aggressive actions conveying a homosexual message or approach, short of physical touching and assault, could be met with career-killing presumptions and counter-accusations questioning the motives of the complainant. In messy, emotionally charged disputes, commanders who side against homosexuals could be accused of "intolerance" that violates the zero-tolerance policy.

And no one has explained how this radical cultural change would improve discipline, morale or readiness.


Huh? We're back to the predatory homosexual argument. She still hasn't managed to respond to the fact that there are already heterosexual men raping fellow women in the service? Oh, that's right - she doesn't want women in the military either. Steve Ralls @ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-ralls/elaine-donnellys-radical_b_119891.html">HuffPost:

First and foremost, Ms. Donnelly's arguments seem to be made with no knowledge of, or expertise in, the Uniform Code of Military Justice or other rules of conduct within the armed forces. If a straight colleague is harassed by a gay service member, she proclaims, they "would have no recourse, short of leaving or avoiding the military altogether."

In fact, the truth is that the UCMJ prohibits such behavior, period, regardless of whether it is same-sex or opposite-sex conduct. Advocates of allowing gay Americans to serve openly have consistently, and always, advocated applying conduct rules and regulations to every soldier, sailor, airman and Marine equally. Repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" doesn't give anyone a pass for unacceptable conduct. It simply means everyone gets treated - and punished - the same.


http://www.pamshouseblend.com/

Wow. Anyone else looking forward to the day when the adults start running the show again?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mooseprime Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. well just because a man is able to kill a complete stranger
in cold blood doesn't mean he could withstand another man making kissy-noises at him! we'd be defenseless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. wow she is something else...
found this...http://www.rightwingwatch.org/individuals/elaine_donnelly/index.html

i also noticed she has`t any degrees or any professional references...but i guess she did`t need any because she was nurtured under the wing of the mother eagle ...http://www.eagleforum.org/column/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ms. Donnelly must have one of the kinkiest fantasy sex lives in D.C.
Edited on Wed Aug-20-08 10:50 AM by TahitiNut
She's nothing but a repressed pervert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC