from Bloomberg:
Bush Ties Prove Radioactive For Asian Leaders: William Pesek Commentary by William Pesek
Aug. 20 (Bloomberg) -- There's an underappreciated common denominator among embattled leaders in Asia: George W. Bush.
For leaders wondering why they lost popular support, there's plenty of blame to go around. In some cases, it was a sluggish economy. In others, it was scandals or corruption. Inept handling of everything from poverty reduction to dodgy infrastructure to climate change may have fanned discontent.
Yet leaders in nations such as Australia, India, Japan, Pakistan and South Korea also are learning of the perils of cozying up an unpopular U.S. president. They've lost elections, resigned or have high disapproval ratings at least partly because of close ties to Washington.
``Busharraf'' is a case in point. That's what Pakistani columnists, bloggers and students call Pervez Musharraf, who resigned Monday. As president of Pakistan, Musharraf portrayed himself as America's staunchest ally in battling Islamic extremists. Critics like former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif said Bush had been ``supporting a dictator,'' a stance that made Sharif perhaps the country's most popular politician.
Before Musharraf there was Shinzo Abe of Japan. Abe arguably became Asia's first Bush-buddy casualty when he resigned as prime minister last September. He continued the policy of his predecessor, Junichiro Koizumi, of strengthening ties with the Bush administration.
Howard's End Koizumi, premier between 2001 and 2006, even stretched Japan's pacifist constitution to send troops to Iraq. It was part of his plan to move Japan closer to the U.S. at the expense of relations in Asia. Abe went further, attempting to change the constitution to allow the country to exert itself militarily. A public backlash ensued, and Abe resigned -- four days after meeting with Bush, as it turned out.
Australia's prime minister was next. John Howard never recovered from suggestions he was Bush's ``deputy sheriff.'' The moniker caused concern in Asia and became increasingly problematic for Howard, especially as the U.S.-led war in Iraq devolved into chaos. A strong economy couldn't save Howard from losing a November election. ......(more)
The complete piece is at:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aDI0tLW_I90o&refer=home