Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fat children ‘should be taken from parents’ to curb obesity epidemic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:25 PM
Original message
Fat children ‘should be taken from parents’ to curb obesity epidemic
From The Times
August 16, 2008

Grossly overweight children may be taken from their families and put into care if Britain’s obesity epidemic continues to escalate, council chiefs said yesterday.

The Local Government Association argued that parents who allowed their children to eat too much could be as guilty of neglect as those who did not feed their children at all.

The association said that until now there had been only a few cases when social services had intervened in obesity cases. But it gave warning that local councils may have to take action much more often and, if necessary, put obese children on “at risk” registers or take them into care. It called for new guidelines to be drawn up to help authorities deal with the issue.

<snip>

The association called for a national debate on how much local authorities should intervene in obesity cases. As a basic minimum, social services or health visitors should talk to the families involved, give them advice and show them how to provide healthy meals. “But in the worst cases would need to be put on ‘at risk’ registers or taken into care.”

<more>

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article4543279.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ugh!
Note to self: Don't move to Britain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Unfortunately, they seem to be
on the cutting edge of a lot of stuff that we end up accepting--CCTV all over the place, ASBO's, stripping people of civil rights in order to "investigate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
23. What are ASBOs?
Edited on Sat Aug-16-08 04:28 AM by fujiyama
Britain is pretty much a police state now. I would also advise anyone to avoid using Heathrow airport. God awful mess. Crowded as hell. Security personnel there is very rude and arrogant.

The worse part is, we're just a step or two behind them. But we're doing our damndest to catch up...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Anti-social behavior orders
See, if your behavior doesn't meet the neighbors' expectations, they can petition for an ASBO to restrain you from doing whatever it is they don't like. Let's say you like to sing in the shower but the neighbor doesn't appreciate it...off he goes to get his ASBO and you are music-less!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. At least, not till you learn how to see through our right-wing press!
No one is planning to take overweight kids in general into care - apart from anything else, the government doesn't have the financial resources to do so. In fact, there aren't the resources to look after many of the children who really are abused or neglected.

This was a particular individual talking about the hypothetical situation of children with life-threatening levels of obesity - which is just as much a potentially fatal eating disorder as its opposite, anorexia.

There *are* real threats to civil liberties in Britain today, but this isn't one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. OMG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. If we did that in Merka, it'd sink the ship of state for damn sure.
I can feel it listing to one side right now.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. They'd have to open big orphanages for fat children.
Good god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. REALLY big orphanages
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Does this orphanage make my ass look huge??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. You guys are killing me. ROFLMAO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. So instead of running away, kinds can just eat lots of Big Macs
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Then they won't be able to run anywhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. and won't need to
:think:

(the preceding snark does not represent my own opinion)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Teach nutrition.
Both in the UK and in the USA. Shit, when I graduated high school, I could make a clock and a shirt, do long math, recite the Declaration of Independence and rule at dodgeball.

Had no idea how to feed myself though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don't give lawmakers in CA ideas
they have this thing about making the lives of people better through government intervention and regulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. I have become more and more convinced
that there's some kind of a viral connection to the current obesity epidemic. Yeah, laugh, but for years everyone thought that ulcers were a result of life style. Turns out many of them were viral. And so with obesity. The current spread really resembles a viral spread to me.

Which does not completely absolve anyone from overeating, which is still an important factor. But why do so many people overeat? Why is it that a normally thin person (say a BMI of 19 or 20) look abnormally thin anymore? Why is it that seeing morbidly obese people is no longer uncommon?

A while back I saw a photo of a high school class on a swim outing, taken in 1965. And to me the most amazing thing about the photo was that no one was even fat, let alone obese. It's a real indicator of how much things have changed.

And while I do believe firmly in personal responsibility, I really think there is more going on than simple lack of will power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shugah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. not viral necessarily but there are factors that contribute (HFCS)
personal responsibility is one thing - the fact that there is high fructose corn syrup in the bread you buy at the grocery store to make a PBJ for your kids for lunch is something else. HFCS as an ingredient in so many food products (why?), growth hormones and antibiotics in you dairy, pesticides and genetic modifications in your fruits and veggies...

what we call food these days isn't the same as what we were eating in 1965.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. Huge Lifestyle Changes, Poor Civic Planning for Suburban Bedroom Communities
1. Centrally located "Big box" retailers/plazas/malls means no walking 1-4 blocks to the neighborhood grocer / drug store / pizza parlor / candy store /playground ...etc.

2. Lack of sidewalks

3. Television / internet/ video games have replaced all or most physical activity for an astonishing number of children, teens, and young adults.

4. Home-prepped, fresh meals replaced by processed boxed food.


Of the four, only one can be attributed to poor parenting, and one can be attributed to head of household priorities. But then, any kid over the age of 8 or 9 should be responsible enough to handle themselves well in a kitchen, if properly trained. The other two, which play a much larger part, IMO, are something that communities have to get off their collective asses about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Unsafe Neighborhoods Linked to Overweight Children
This could SO be turned around on policy makers.


Unsafe Neighborhoods Linked to Overweight Children

ANN ARBOR, Mich., Jan. 4 - Parents who keep their children indoors to avoid the hazards of a dangerous neighborhood may be setting the kids up for another kind of trouble -- obesity.


So says a study published in the January issue of Archives of Pediatrics. Researchers reported that seven-year-olds whose parents rated their neighborhoods the most unsafe were at a higher risk of being overweight compared with the children of parents who thought their neighborhoods were relatively safe (adjusted odds ratios, 4.43; 95% confidence interval, 2.03-9.65).


http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/Parenting/tb/2428

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. I would agree with this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. This can't be a surprise to anyone
Also considering that children in unsafe neighborhoods generally have parents with little time or skills to cook, and eat a lot of fast food...and of course, this is a set up for obesity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bring Back the Raves! Let the People Dance!
Dancing is very good exercise.

The UK did not have such an obesity problem with its youth during the '90s.
Neither did we. Why? Because the kids were dancing their asses off, literally!


LET THE PEOPLE DANCE!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChazII Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Good idea
Replace smelly PE classes with Dance classes in middle and high schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
38. We Outlawed Dance Music
By mocking it at every opportunity until only the most crass commercialists and Moby and sometimes Beck are willing to work in that genre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. The "Entertainment" Industry Regards Dancing as Competition
Raves, psytrance parties and the like are entirely too participatory for their liking.
They would vastly prefer having us sit at home and watch TV.
They got their way for the most part.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Interesting Point
and I don't mean that in an insulting way ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. Maybe a good first step in the US
would be for the government to stop subsidizing high fructose corn syrup for soft drinks.

Crazy idea, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Read the damned article.
It's talking about severe neglect cases, not the random fat kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
30. Yeah like those 200 lb three year olds I see on Murray.
Those kids SHOULD be taken away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. Why bother reading? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. C'mon. That would take to much time
An uninformed opinion is just as valid as an informed opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
18. If there were no fat children...
There would be no one to make fun of. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. Can't be having the future labor slaves, errr, I mean, "human resources"
Too fat to work or join the military now can we? C'mon get with the program people.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
24. Maybe they've got a point. Morbidly obese children ARE victims of poor parenting.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not talking about the merely overweight children.
I mean, the super obese children who get overfed by someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
28. see, i would never agree to anything like this. but then again i smoke...
so maybe i should agree to the persecution of the fat because its almost united in the persecution of me.

i never smoke in public. always at home. i never endanger any of you fine people. but i am always the object of your wrath.

fuck him. he's a smoker. do we need some more money? tax the shit out of him. screw him. he's a smoker.

when the govermant came for the smokers,
i remained silent;
i was not a smoker.

so maybe now its the fats chance to get screwed with.

maybe now i should derive the same pleasure from your plight. maybe we should tax fat? force you to quit your fat ways or pay...

hummm?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. broad, bitter brush much? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
29. I see a lot of fat children reaching for a hamburger now
to quell their anxiety that the goverment will take them from their parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our third quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Speaking of fat children in need of state supervision...
Grovvy, that's not muscle weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC