Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has anyone ever head of a wingnut theory that oil is still being produced

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 09:56 PM
Original message
Has anyone ever head of a wingnut theory that oil is still being produced
in nature somehow, and we will never run out? My favorite right-wing loony dropped that one on me earlier this evening, & I'm wondering f this is something he's picking up from Rush & the other Talking Rectums on the McLamestream Media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's the whole idea that Fossil Fuels don't come from fossils, but through geology
There was even a DU'er advocating this madness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Now, that's rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Love that Venn Diagram
Too true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is still being produced
Give it a couple hundred million years. You'll see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The laugh will be on us then!
Till then, let's do something different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Well, yes, of course. But I somehow suspect
that oil consumption may be slightly outpacing the rate of "oilification" of vegetable matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Why'd you have to start nitpicking???
You and your damn negativity! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Because it's my job. Ever since Spiro Agnew, I have self-identified as
a nattering nabob of negativity. At least the nattering and negativity parts. I never really made it to nabob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
33. but you have to have a goal-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think that there's actually some science behind it, but it is not...
being produced at a rate that equals or exceeds the rate at which we consume it. I'll ask my father - he's a geologist in the oil business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
37. I think they are confusing oil seeping into played out oil fields
with oil being produced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tindalos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Depends on how long you're willing to wait.
I guess, if you were really, really patient...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
some guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. supposedly comes from Stalinist Russia
Edited on Thu Aug-07-08 10:06 PM by some guy
search for Stalin + Russia + abiotic oil.

Happy reading :hi:

on edit: you can also just search abiotic oil

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. OIl is not produced, it is pumped out of the earth! WTF?
Do people think we make oil?? Excuse me, when it is gone we can not make or "produce" anymore. This is unreal thinking!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What part of "wingnut theory" are you having trouble with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
31. Umm...the actual pumping of oil out of the earth is referred to as "production". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Sensible Donating Member (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
35. Something has to produce it before we can pump it!!!!!!!!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. Honestly, I think Stephen Colbert said that.
Seriously, I don't remember which episode (I'm really behind on the summaries), but I know he has.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kinda like the same way meat grows maggots when it's left out. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Spontaneous generation. Yeah. I like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is not so much a wingnut theory, my wife went to school in Japan and was taught this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think it goes like this:
At the center of the world, which is hollow, is the Petroleum tree, which was planted by God on or about the fifth day. He in his infinite wisdom expected the humans to drill into it someday, which is why he made it before men, and put it underground. Yea, put in in the very firmament, where it sank.

The petroleum tree branches out all under the span of the globe, but the branches are usually located where the hearts of men are hardened, so there shall be wars and rumors of wars, or whatever works. But it's war over God's own Petroleum tree--so it's holy. It also branches out in really inconvenient places, like under the sea. But drilling under the sea for it will be like tapping a keg--because yea verily, the results of the neverending flow will be immediate, for the tree representeth the power and the glory of the wishful-thinking--pretty much, amen.

And lo, the tree is that which makes petroleum as its fruit, so it is renewable. For it is written, "By their fruits shall ye know them" and we have tasted of the fruit of the Petroleum Tree, and found it good.

The heathen will call the fruit of the Petroleum tree "fossil fuel" for they are heathen, and believeth in fossils, and think that the earth was very old, but that the supply of oil be finite. But the true believer knows that the world is young, and the tree is old, and the fuel is forever and ever, heating the mansions in heaven of the faithful, and fueling the furnace of those that disbelieveth in the Petroleum tree. For they are the suckage, and fall into the iniquities of solar and wind-powered heresies. Which are renewable and do not come from God, or a Commodities market. For these renewable enegies speak of independence, and not fealty to the Lord of the Petroleum tree.


For in it's trunk the Petroleum tree burneth, and that with a mighty fire. And out of the burning mouth, it spake thus:

You have been weighed in the balance, and found wanting--that is demand. Although I am everflowing, there is still only so much of me to go around. So I visit you with plagues of high pump prices and home heating costs, for I am Supply. And for those that yield unto me, I will make their cup runneth over with gas cards. And those that serveth me best, will experience record profits. But woe be unto him who purchases a Hybrid. For his car will be ridiculed.

And inflate thee not thy tires, for my name's sake. For every drop of mine is sacred. But all must be consumed.

And though you could conserve--thou shalt not, for mine is the Way, and the Energy, and the thing making your chariot go, m-f'er.



Or something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Y'know, I hate to see something like this go to waste. Let's start a religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. The religion of the Petroleum tree scares me a little--
not because I think it would become influential, but because I think it already is. There are people speculating on the energy market right now who do not buy into the idea that there will ever be "peak oil" or that another technology could ever take the place of the combustible chemical engines (good Jah almighty--how last, last century is that?) that drive us right now. And they would rather block something better than lose their shirts--when they could just as easily seek the better resource. It's their thinking, the "Petroreligion", that damns them and us to this cycle.

The same minds love the country-side rape of coal, and thrill to the notion of the cooling towers of the nuclear plant and flirtation with Chernobyl--all commodity. All centralized in industry hands. All oblivious to environmental danger. All market baron and willing consumer, putting in his chit to get central air and night-time lighting...but not ever being in control of his own power. How does anyone prefer a nuclear plant in their backyard to a wind farm? Who would be more happy subscribing fully to the "grid" by paying their light bill--than making others' light bill less by having solar panels plugged into the grid, and even having surplus? And imagine a day when you pull into the parking lot of your employer--and there's a jack at every parking spot for you to juice up your hybrid. And it's cheap enough it's a pay deduction you barely feel. Power provided by the local solar concern. Every business of course converted. And the utilities companies still getting their dime for access and maintenance of the power lines.

(Disclaimer: My father was a lineman for a public utility. Therefore, I am a trifle dotty about energy.)

My religion would involve making public utilities really public again, and rock and roll. And probably something to do with sticking it to the man. I'm like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I thought vixengrl just did (start a religion). How much more of an oracle could anyone want?
Edited on Thu Aug-07-08 11:06 PM by Idealist Hippie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I try not to start religions
when I can help it.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Why not?
Lots of religions have a world-tree. As a Dane who overdosed on the elder Edda in childhood, my personal choice is Yggdrasil. I imagine there is material there that we could, uh, drill down to.

Religions are very profitable (prophetable?). Why the hell not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Because in this religion, thems that have the oil--
will have the gold. I'm not soliciting contributions from Exxon to rock a cathedral--I bet the collection plate would be full of slippery pennies that smelled like crude and washed-up fish. Unless...

We could bilk the oil companies into thinking we signed off on and after-the-fact absolved them through our new Book (The Book of The Oil Testament.) We'd let them contribute to us, while engaging in simple charity, like making sure oil compny employees in Brownsville could get their kids living in a couple dozen miles from the refinery, covered for all their asthma and such. We'd tend to the poor, bankrupt, pensionless refugees of failed (Enron) energy concerns. But secretly:

We'd be deep in the pockets of IBEW and other unions.

We'd be converting people to solar, one household at a time.

We'd sink money into GM opening a solar/gas hybrid operation in Flint, MI.

We'd have lawyers represent the Western Shoshone in re: Yucca, and revisit the Dineh in re: their being shuffled off their land for the coal concern.

We'd mandate "juicing stations" in car parks.

It wouldn't be a religion-it would be a campaign itself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. I kinda like that...
But where's the part about where we ourselves get obscenely wealthy, a la Robertson, Moon, L. Ron Hubbard, etc.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Now that better be a DUzy
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tannybogus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's a geological process.
I'm sure it is being formed somewhere. However, it won't suddenly appear in huge amounts.

Mother Nature can't keep up with us.:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
26. Are you guys just stupid?
Here is how oil is produced. An "Idea" is presented to Bush. The Bush brain, intent on self preservation, produces something similar to antibodies called "antithought. These chemicals react to help dissolve what remains of Bushes brain and reduce it to " oily substances" in his shorts, thereby producing new sources of oil for our country! Fuel crisis solved!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. You can't believe how glad I am you explained that to us.
Christ, is the whole board as drunk as I am?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsotm-wywh Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
28. It actually is still being produced by the Earth but...
they won't be able to drill for it for millions of years and therefore isn't really going to make much of a dent on gas prices. Maybe a quarter or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. QUICK< BUy OIL OPTIONS!!! THUS IS HUGH!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
32. Its the Abiotic Oil theory...
Edited on Fri Aug-08-08 09:41 AM by SidDithers
and there have even been DU'ers supporting the idea.

Sid

Edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
36. Yep they claim it's not based on biological material but science doesn't back it up.
Edited on Fri Aug-08-08 10:03 AM by seasat
Plants take up CO2 in different isotopic ratios than occurs in the atmosphere. Solar energy creates several both the standard carbon 12 and a few carbon 13 isotopes. Both are stable so unlike C14 they won't degrade over geological time. Plants take up the lighter Carbon 12 in greater proportion than the Carbon 13. Since plant life is the main source of primary production for terrestrial life, all plants and animals end up with this ratio. What this means, in regard to oil, is that if it the result of some unknown geochemical process that doesn't involve biological material, it will not have the lower isotopic ratio. Oil does however have this ratio so it is from terrestrial biological origin and doesn't spontaneous occur like the abiotic oil wingnuts believe it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
38. seepage from surrounding layers yes, recovering not so much...
A friend I know has a gas well on his property. It normally runs 75psi or something like that, one time the regulator was knocked off by his horse and they didn't discover it until the pressure was at 7. The fixed the valve and over the years it's recovered back to the 75 psi.

Of course this isn't to be confused with oil wells but some of the same theory still applies. His gas well was abandoned back in the 60's because it had stopped producing. He fuels two homes completely off this well...one lucky man that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC