So, what are the odds that Dr. Ivins was working late in the lab
hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:22 PM
Original message
So, what are the odds that Dr. Ivins was working late in the lab
because he found out that some anthrax was missing and instead of reporting it he panicked and worked at nights to grow new anthrax to replace it?
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Or, that he work late in the lab sometimes?
FBI only shows those two months. What about all the other months? Only the super lame "We have no fucking case" FBI would point to working late as evidence of criminality.
hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good point - this info is significant only if he worked late just the few
months before and after the attack. (He could have been in the lab to remove any evidence afterward IF he was guilty.)
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Right but, why start with his guilt?
Why didn't FBI show his hours Jan-Aug of that year? Because they want you to focus on the attacks, not on his actual hours, so they only show his hours for the two months when there were attacks.
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. They do have a 12month chart if I'm remembering it correctly.
though it only compares 2001 and 2002 or 2000 and 2001, not all 3.
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Do they? I don't remember that. They had a comparison
of Ivans and other workers -- as if they were all working on an assembly line. But they zero in on those two months. Swoooosh!
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. oh, I saw a different one, not vs. other workers. Somewhere in the doc dump. nt
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'll go back and check this evening. Too much information
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. And, you're right, JIOOU. There is a twelve month graph. n/t
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. don't worry, those time results were in an Excel chart
how can you argue with that kind of evidence? :shrug:
mhatrw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's truly compelling evidence.
Edited on Thu Aug-07-08 03:35 PM by mhatrw
Not quite as compelling as PowerPoint, but you have to consider that they only had seven years.
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And it's REALLY suspicious that he was spending exactly the same # of minutes in B3
each night. What kind of evil mastermind was this guy?
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. An evil mastermind with a Swiss watch?!
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Aug-07-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Or that he used his lab "late & unexplained" for hanky panky?
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.