Why We Don't Shoot Back

[marmar]

from OurFuture.org:



Why We Don't Shoot Back
By Sara Robinson

August 5th, 2008 - 6:44pm ET


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Drew Westen and Mike Lux both have cogent and persuasive posts up that deftly explain — and raise the alarm about — the timidity that's recently settled into Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign. Sen. John McCain's shooting live rounds now; and, as usual, the Democrats are refusing to fire back. If that doesn't change — this week, before the Olympics starts — this could all too easily turn into Dukakis-all-over-again.

Progressives have been picking at the whys and wherefores of this pattern ever since Adlai Stevenson lost to Eisenhower. (One of my favorite explanations came from Paul Rosenberg, who dug into the psychology of both sides in this excellent series last year at Open Left.) But there's one fairly simple and glaring factor that I'm increasingly convinced plays at least some role in this — and since I've never seen it discussed anywhere else, I'm going to propose it here.

We've all got our short lists of books that changed the way we look at things forever. One of the ones I keep going back to is Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America, published in 1989 by Brandeis historian David Hackett Fischer. Fischer's basic argument -- which he supports with a weighty and richly researched sociological survey that runs to 700 pages plus another 200 pages of footnotes -- is that most of America's most enduring cultural and political conflicts can be traced back to essential differences between the first four groups of English settlers, who brought four very different worldviews with them, and set deep patterns that continue to influence America's identity and choices to this day.

To quickly summarize, the first of these groups were the Puritans, the bulk of whom arrived in New England between 1630 and1650. They were Reform Protestants who brought with them a notion of "ordered liberty." They believed that government authority, including the right to use force, properly belongs not to individuals, but to communities; and that individuals would necessarily need to conform their will to that of the larger whole for society to succeed. In the generations that followed, their descendants spread Puritan culture across the northern tier of the county, into the Pacific Northwest, and down the West Coast to northern California. These are, today, still the most liberal parts of the country. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2008083205/why-we-dont-shoot-back

[angrycarpenter]

1. Maybe that explains

Why I would like to see Obama answer negative ads in kind. I am from scots-irish stock.

[Hawkowl]

2. Very well done

A very enlightening article that lends scholarly sociological evidence to what many of us progressives know on a gut level.

[riverdeep]

3. Marking the article to read and absorb later.

Thanks for bringing it to attention.

[bdf]

4. Definitely a MUST read

And a MUST act upon for Obama.

Hell, it could even explain why Pelosi is such a wuss.