Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Stars & Bars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 05:50 PM
Original message
Poll question: The Stars & Bars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Celebrating Treason. How fucking American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. "Treason" is always the flawed premise from which bad history flows
The south saw the north betraying the ideals of self-government (especially via the 10th Amendment) and the Constitution. It was a war for independence. Of course, the Tories in the American Revolution saw the rebelling colonists as the "traitors", all things being relative. One nation's traitor is another nation's defender.

The prevailing view on secession was, if the states could vote to ratify the Constitution and be admitted to the union, then they could damn sure withdraw when that same Constitution was, in their view, betrayed. They wouldn't have voted themselves into the union if they couldn't vote themselves out. The Constitution is a contract, and secession was in effect, suing the union for breach of contract.

As for slavery, the U.S. federal Constitution endorsed it for nearly 78 years, relegating human beings as "3/5ths" of a person. At war's beginning, U.S. Grant's wife owned slaves - like Lincoln's wife, they were from prominent slaveowning families. Slavery was but one (albeit the most dramatic and emotionally immediate) dimension of the conflict. If anything, it was an economic war on all fronts - embracing issues such as the prohibitive tariff and the overwhelming manufacturing advantage of the north over the agrarian economy of the south. Stonewall Jackson even floated the idea that if the Confederacy had freed the slaves at war's beginning, it would have kept Lincoln from making it a war about slavery, when it was in effect, a war for secession, or better yet, independence. But like Jefferson and the other founders of the original republic, the Confederacy was no more prepared to give up human bondage any more than the founders of the very republic from which they sought a break. Both sides had clung to the notion that it would fade away on its own accord. Of course, a string of compromises (Missouri in 1820, or the 1850 Compromise) over the decades slowly revealed that it was naive idealism or wishful thinking at best, as economic tensions and the growing moral urgency of emancipation could no longer be restrained.

In the Union Army, McClellan didn't want to get the notion out there that it was a war for emancipation, or he would have had mass desertion in the ranks. It was Lincoln's strategy, and a testament to his political genius, to let that notion evolve.

Ultimately, the rank-and-file Confederate soldier or sailor was fighting for the defense of his home, as the most local of patriots, not one tied to the abstract questions of ideology, economics, race, or law. As one rebel put it when a Union soldier asked why he was fighting, "Because you're down here."

In due course as the war became an increasingly distant memory, the federal government passed a law in 1913 giving both living and dead Confederate veterans full U.S. veteran status. They were American soldiers, in the end, given full military honors at burial. To call a Confederate veteran a traitor, is in effect, calling a U.S. veteran a traitor. It was after all, an American war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. You can be a traitor and be right. You can be a traitor and be wrong.
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 11:22 PM by BullGooseLoony
They were traitors who were wrong.

And they lost.

That flag is shit. Banning it would go against our principles, but anyone who flies it and calls themselves a loyal American doesn't know what they're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Nobody called Confederate veterans traitors.
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 11:36 PM by oktoberain
The flag represents the Confederate *government*. Big difference between the government and the individuals.

The Southern states had a skewed definition of what it meant to be a "Union." The entire POINT of the Union was E pluribus unum--Of many, one. You can take eggs, milk, flour, and butter and make them into a cake. But you can't take cake and turn it into eggs, milk, flour, and butter. When the states became a Union, they ceased being separate and became something else--something that could not be broken up into separate pieces again. It took a horrible war to firmly establish that fact, but fact it is. If the Southerners had truly wanted to secede, their job was to convince the rest of the nation that the Right to Secede should be explicit in the Constitution, and to pass and ratify an Amendment that said so. They could not, and did not. Their mistake. Too bad.

Everything is so different now than it was back then, it's hard for us to relate to the political climate. Back then, the "corporatist" (federalist) types like Hamilton were in favor of a strong federal government, and the more "liberal" (anti-federalist) types like Jefferson wanted government to be incredibly small and as locally-centralized as possible. That's completely the opposite of what we have today.

Sometimes there are issues that are more important than maintaining the purity of your philosophy of government. Slavery was a human rights issue--a deeply, horribly, insanely WRONG thing. If it meant that the anti-federalist notions of state sovereignty and limiting federal power had to be violated in order to Right that Wrong, so be it. The problem is not that the government tried to "change the rules in the middle of the game" (as one Confederate sympathizer recently tried to justify it to me.) The problem is that it never should have been permitted in the first place. That mistake had to be rectified before our society and our nation could move forward. If it meant violating the principles of the government at the time in order to do it, well...the vast, vast majority of people today would say that it was well worth it.

That being said, our First Amendment guarantees us the right to fly the Confederate flag (or ANY flag) if we so choose. However, it also gives the rest of us the right to say that those people are fucking assholes.

Those people are fucking assholes.

Edit: Apparently the guy above me just DID call the veterans traitors at some point while I was composing my post. What I meant was that the point of the post you responded to wasn't about criticizing the soldiers (who often had no choice but to fight--the Confederacy had a draft, after all.) The problem with the flag is that it represents a government who fought and killed for the sake of being able to continue owning slaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Excellent post!. . light, not heat. . thank you. . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. That was the battle flag.
Not the flag of the Confederacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. Well the article didn't have a picture
so when someone says "The Confederate Flag", I automatically think of the Stars and Bars--not the battle flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. Specifically, the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia
Lee's army.

not the Confederate national flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. Actually, it was the Naval flag
The battle flag looked similar but was square in shape.

Naval flag:


Battle flag:


(Civil War geek. Can't help myself.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. Oh god, not this shit again
The Civil War was all about slavery, pure and simple. All this other stuff - tariffs, states rights, embargoes, etc - was just window dressing. The underlying issue behind all these other issues was slavery, and the South was determined not to allow anything to interfere with that.

These people took up arms against the federal government to protect that "peculiar institution". They were traitors, every last one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
46. Yep - couldn't have said it better myself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #26
51. Oh boy...
No war is "pure and simple", much less the Civil War. It was not all about slavery, though slavery played an integral part in it. And the vast majority of the men who fought on the Confederate side did not own slaves and were fighting primarily for what they perceived as their homeland. And a great many more were drafted into a war they never wanted to fight. They were poor, ignorant farmers who were goaded into war by the slave-owning aristocracy. The rank and file Confederate soldier was no ideologue for slavery.

But I guess they were traitors, every last one of them, just like the Iraqis are terrorists, every last one of them. Right? Riiiiiiiiiiight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
47. The most illogical conclusion I've seen in a long time.
"To call a Confederate veteran a traitor, is in effect, calling a U.S. veteran a traitor. It was after all, an American war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why can't you Damn Yankees get it straight?
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 06:00 PM by El Supremo
Stars and Bars:




Confederate Battle Flag:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. This Yankee knows the difference
and usually points it out. The Battle Flag was usurped by the KKK ca.1866, and has been used as a symbol of racism and intolerance ever since. I usually rile Southerners who insist it is the "Confederate flag"--you see, ignorance of the facts knows no geographic boundaries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Dont think so
Looking at photos of large KKK rallies and parades in the 1920s and early 30s, the only flag That I saw was stars and stripes. The KKK started to co-opt the old confederate battle flag during the 1950s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Kindly remember that in the 20s and 30s
the KKK was popular not only in the South, but also in the North. There were large Klaverns in Illinois and Indiana. This was the time that the KKK was moving north, so of course it made sense NOT to use the Battle Flag at that time. There were still plenty of folks alive who remembered The War at that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. True, but when the United Klans marched
In DC in the 1920s, not a Confederate Flag in Site. This was a gathering of all of the Klan organizations is the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. the yankees WON the war - why should they bother with the trappings of the losers? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
40. Wrong...the whole nation LOST...sigh...perspectives...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I've seen more confederate battle flag merchandise at a county fair in upstate New York
Than I have anywhere in the south. Makes one wonder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. I oppose flying the Battle Flag of Northern Virginia
because it was usurped by the racist KKK after the war. It was NEVER the official flag of the Confederacy, though many think it was. The Confederacy was a failed state, a failed racist state intent upon maintaining the feudal class system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. The swastika.
What's the big whoop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Middle finga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. The only thing the stars and bars is good for is lightening fires
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 06:25 PM by Middle finga
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2KS2KHonda Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well that's good...there are way too many heavy fires out there.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. That's the Union Jack of the UK being burned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #19
43. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
44. Finally....
Edited on Tue Aug-05-08 12:21 PM by truebrit71
..self delete...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. I Don't Think It's Fair to Evaluate Confederate Symptoms...
With Zeitgeist!

Historically, Confederate symbols represented the plight of underdogs battling against a greater power with brilliant leadership and fewer resources. This view differs greatly from those of fringe elements who have wrongly adopted these same banners. Americans should not lose recognition of their historical significance, and should not permit fringe lunatics to claim them as their own. If we label Confederate standards as symptoms of hate, we are giving up these historical artifacts without a fight!

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. The trouble with that analogy
was that those who started the secession were anything but underdogs. They were the elite of the South whose arrogance actually greatly contributed to its downfall. For example, one reason the South had "fewer resources" was because the Confederate government refused to sell their cotton to Europe before Lincoln put up the blockade. They figured that Europe would give in to their terms, and they were wrong. And the Confederate government reeked with sycophants--Davis appointed friends to commands that they were totally unqualified for while ignoring more qualified officers. The poor whites who made up the majority of the troops were often drafted to fight-the first draft came from the South, not the North. Remember that those with 20 slaves were exempt from the draft, even at the end of the War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Yes, My Analogy is Romanticism...
When the legend becomes the fact, print the legend. That romantic view prevailed among people in the defeated South.

Actually, the South never wanted for war materiel. Their army scavenged war supplies from Northern armies, which eliminated any shortfalls. "Arrogance" was less pervasive than poor leadership that had Confederate force fight an offensive, rather than defensive, war. Generals studied Jomini and they should have studied Clausewitz! Lee was not a great strategic thinker. Although, he excelled in tactical warfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. The arrogance of the upper classes in the South is alive and well
When my husband was a lad, he wanted to go to military school, and his parents sent him to one of the best. He came across the Southern elites--spoiled rich kids who were sent there in lieu of going to jail for "youthful indiscretions" They were all about connections and power and getting their own way, feeling that because they were of the upper classes they deserved the best even if they didn't merit it. Hmmmm....you know, I don't think that is a regional feeling as much as a feeling of certain upper classes. Seems to me I've read about that attitude popping up in Connecticut as well as Georgia......:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
49. I Agree!
Especially among Southern men, arrogance has traditionally been so prevalent that it has become a curse.

My sister-in-law, a native Georgian, chose to marry my Western Colorado brother to get away from Southern men. She diplomatically stated, "Southern men have an attitude." Yeah, most of them are a**holes. lol Although, I have met some very decent gentlemen from the South also. Good Democrats = Good Guys, usually. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdf Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. Other
Yeah, the people who fly that flag are almost always racist fuckers. But, to quote Noam Chomsky:


If we don't believe in freedom of expression for
people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.


And the reason I believe that even these inbred racise fucktards are entitled to freedom of expression is that it means that so am I. Which means I get to call them on it, which shows just how stupid these arseholes are.

Freedom of speech is a two-edged sword. And in a battle of wits, these morons are coming unarmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. Most of the people flying the Battle Flag do so in support of ...
...eating BBQ and fried chicken, hunting hogs, fishing for bass, listening to country music, water skiing in muddy rivers, SEC football, and revering Jesus than in support of Confederate ideology or Jim Crow segregation.

But my wife who is a life long Georgian, UGA grad, and whose family fought in the recent unpleasantness says that I don't know what I'm talking about and the flag is still inherently about racism.

BTW, this is Stars and Bars



and this is the N. Va. Battle Flag that many Confederate units adopted.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
34. BTW, did anyone notice the resemblance of Stars and Bars to the GA state flag?
A few years back people expressed their unhappiness witht he GA state flag containing the image of the Confederate Battel Flag.



So it was changed to a blue flag with the seal and small images of past GA flags along the bottom. No one liked it so it was changed again to:



which has a striking resemblance to the first Confederate flag known as Stars and Bars



So what was won?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. My friend has a litmus test for seperating bigots and genuine confederate history enthusiasts
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 08:06 PM by Hippo_Tron
You simply ask them if they know who Judah Benjamin was and whether or not they know that he was Jewish.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. It belongs in a museum.
Not on a flagpole, and certainly not on the back of a truck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. I do not support it, but it does not offend me.
Sometimes, it might scare me a little.

But I almost always tolerate it. The only exception is if it is flown on government property. That doesn't seem right to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
24. I'm indifferent to it.
You want to fly it? Fly it. You want to burn it? Burn it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
25. I voted for "offends".....but...
But I have a caveat. I don't really care if an individual flies it or wears it or whatever.

I strongly oppose any governmental agency at any level flying or displaying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
30. Links to the Declarations of Secession
and other CSA documents. http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/csa/csapage.htm

Reading the Declarations for GA, MS, SC, and TX shows they had no question of why they seceeded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
33. Other:
I find much that the flag symbolizes to be offensive.

I support the display of the flag on private property, whether I find it offensive or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenocrates Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
38. Freedom of Expression (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
41. The flag is a symbol, like all symbols it is used for good and ill.
How many times have we seen the stars and stripes wrapped around the worst of crimes in an attempt to make a pile of excrement holy?

The same is true for the Confederate Battle Flag, it means different things to different people.

To those who marched for civil rights, it is a symbol of intolerance and bigotry, as it was carried by those who attacked and beat them.

To those who take pride in their southern background, it is a symbol of their heritage, of the Southern rebellious streak that has never really gone away

To those who had ancestors fight under those colors (like myself), it is an ambivalent symbol. I abhor the Confederacy and what it stood for, but my ancestors thought it was worth fighting for. For them, that flag symbolized their home, as much as the Stars and stripes mean home for me. And yet the Stars and Stripes are not without ambivalence for me. It means home for me, but for millions of people around the globe, that flag is as much a symbol of fear and danger for them as it is one of hope for me.

I remember some time ago seeing a picture of the Confederate Battle flag being carried next to a Nazi banner during a Klan rally. I felt a little sick, particularly when I thought of the men who fought under the southern colors. Those men were not saints by any sense of the word, and I strongly believe that their cause was not just, but they weren't Nazis, and I think every time that equivalence is made there are many "Johnny Rebs" who turn in their grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
42. Ummm.... the Stars and Bars isn't the Battle Flag of Virginia.
Stupid is as stupid does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
45. I can be offended and still defend the right to display it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
48. I am offended by the word "offended." It makes objecting to it sound subjective rather than...
the objective statement that it represents treason and race-based slavery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
50. I piss on the stars and bars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC