Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lingering Myths about Generation X

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 12:15 AM
Original message
Lingering Myths about Generation X
This article is a few years old, but I found it interesting.

Myth #1:

Generation Xers are, and always will be, outnumbered by other generations

Researchers define a generation as a group of peers who share similar life experiences. Notwithstanding those who doubt the credibility of generation-based characterizations, generational divides still provide some of the most useful insights into large groups of our population. The Baby Boomer generation was born between 1946 and 1964, a span of 18 years. Generation X, on the other hand, is not so easily categorized. Most commonly, those born between 1965 and 1978 are considered Xers, but several influential research reports have expanded the conventional 13-year span to one more comparable to that of the Boomers — 1961 to 1981.


More at the link...

http://www.housingzone.com/article/CA503868.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm 1962 and aren't sure where I belong. Feels like neither place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The article discusses that folks born in the early 1960's generally feel trapped in the middle.
I think it depends on one's individual experiences with history and the perspective one gleans from those experiences... Obama is a good example. He ID's with Gen X because of his adamant with to depart from Boomer politics, which he feels are divisive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I agree that Obama is an Xer.
His life experiences mirror those of many Xers. His mom seems to have been an early boomer and he has WWII generation grandparents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. He IS an X'er, he WILL be the first Gen X president...
and he is not:

a) a slacker

b) completely cynical

c) pretentious

d) craving another hit of Nirvana

e) all of the above, while high
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Reagan said that Generation X would be the first generation to be denied the American dream.
It sent chills through my bones and made me hate the treasonous bastard even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Unfortunately, he is correct, and that son-of-a-bitch is the primary reason why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. WORD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestPerspective Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. He is certainly NOT an Xer, he is GenJones
there is certainly a generation between the boomers and xers, and obama is part of that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. That's not what Strauss and Howe say, however.
See post below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestPerspective Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Yes, but strauss and howe's theories are much less respected these days...
see post below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. They are not less respected.
Their research is one of the best known guides into this study.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. They used to call them "Tweeners", those at the back end of "Boomers" and the front end of "Xers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You're the DISCO GENERATION!!
:rofl:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_generations

But seriously, I actually like some disco tunes. Should I feel ashamed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestPerspective Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. Generation Jones is the commonly used name...
for the generation between the boomers and xers. Tweeners and Disco Generation are virtually never used, while Generation Jones has been used in literally thousands of articles, etc. just google it and you'll see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malletgirl02 Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Generation jones
I heard that people born in the early 60's are referred to as generation Jones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Jones'n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Nice graphic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arnold Judas Rimmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wasn't that a band back in the 1970s?
I think Billy Idol was with them, maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Duuude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. ...
Gen X sucks we millennials rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Hmmm... let me think about that.
No!

;)

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Rule what? Bedheadland?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Born 1982, identify more with Gen X than Millennials
Makes sense, being born on the cusp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sentelle Donating Member (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. I thought trhis one interesting
Myth #4:
Generation Xers favor intangibles over possessions

One of the biggest misconceptions about Generation X is that they reject material wealth in favor of rich intellectual, spiritual and social lives — that they value experiences over possessions. Coupland called this idea "lessness" or "status substitution."

Having and spending money may lack novelty for Xers, but that doesn't mean it is not important. This generation has been participating in discretionary spending since they were teenagers, and now they want to maintain a similar level of affluence. Time's publication of the New American Dream study revealed that the majority of Xers believe material things, such as their homes and cars, are very important.

Xers are an important group when it comes to discretionary spending, largely because they are reaching peak ages for life stages associated with heavy spending. Generation X has produced homebuyers and home-improvement shoppers at an earlier age than ever before, and they will go to great lengths to make their homes reflect personal tastes and preferences. Kid-friendly items are also a hot market for Xers now that 55% of them have children.

According the Consumer Expenditure Survey, Generation X outspends the average consumer in several categories, including eating out, clothing, transportation, entertainment, audio/visual equipment and housing. Table 4 outlines household spending on select items for Generation X compared with that of the average consumer.



The thing is. Xers are quite familiar with the idea of spending, as latch-key kids, they have always had to deal with the idea of having things rather than 'quality time with the family'. Yes, our parents were not home, so the parents made it up by buying crap. This doesn't mean that we don't buy... we do, boy do we. but we are also looking for value, since buying crap doesn't make anyone feel good inside, and doesn't replace the love of a parent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. i was born in 72, and prefer the intangibles.
we didn't have a lot growing up. and little things meant more to us. they still do. while it is nice to have things, i prefer spending time with my kids and fostering the desire for experiences over possessions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
37. Gotta say, I was pretty big on spending...
...but I spent on things that made little sense to others, because of the "intangibles" that those things represented. These days, of necessity, I have to be much more restrained, but I still have to watch myself so I don't burn through a little extra cash that occasionally comes my way. Got me in major credit card trouble, too. But the high of a successful hunt-and-purchase was worth it to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. 1961 to 1981 is more like it
I was born in late '64 and never (ever , ever!) felt part of the Boomers. They were in college when I was a toddler. The eternal flame was burning on JFK's grave before I was even conceived.

Being grouped in statistically was "Boomer bracket creep".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. 1978 is not the X cutoff - 75 is
78 is a millennial, they were 11, maybe 12 when the Berlin Wall came down. That, for me, is the cusp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. 1962 here, I've always felt more Xer than Boomer
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 03:27 PM by supernova
I never identified with my sister and brother, both definitely boomers (1948 & 52 to be exact),

I always was way more experiential and existential than they were and still are. Though my brother is less materialistic than my sister. I'm the least materialsitic (even more than my niece, born in 1970. I am probably the most generally spiritual, without doctrine attached.

edit: While I'm not too fond of "Gen X," I really dislike "Generation Jones," because I truly do no envy Boomers, nor do I wish to be younger than I am either. How typically Boomer is that to think that people younger than you are envious of you. :eyes: Suck it, Pontell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I'm absolutely in agreement with you about Generation Jones.
I find the term to be a cop-out, frankly. I don't recall there being some sort of special "cusp" designation for those born between the Silent and Baby Boom generations; individuals on the cusp, depending on their experiences, can sway one way or another.

I was born in 1975 and am a Gen X'er in every way. My two sisters were born in 1963 and 1966, and also are Gen-X to a T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestPerspective Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Generation Jones is largest generation in U.S. history
Generation Jones is not a cusp generation...it is, in fact the largest generation in U.S. history. And the jones connotation isn't about envying Boomers at all, it's about the underlying unrequited feeling experienced by members of this generation of huge expectations left unfulfilled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. What years are you using to slate Gen Jones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestPerspective Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. GenJones: 1954-1965, 26% of all U.S. adults
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. That's such a small cohort... I've read about Gen Jones...
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 09:17 PM by Writer
on the internet, but what I don't understand about this group is that all transitions in collective experience will have people who don't fall into either category. Why the special designation between Boomers and X'ers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestPerspective Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. gen jones rings true
because typically, gens are more or less accurate, but these 2 gens-boom and x- were wrong from beginning...yes there was a boom in births from 46-64, but there were 2 gens born during that period, not one...x def all screwed up also...turned out reason they couldnt figure out where to draw lines was because they were trying to deliniate 2 gens--boom/x, when really there were 3--boom/jones/x...and on your other point, not such a small cohort, these days most gen experts say gens are 10-15 not 20 yrs...gen jones is 12 yrs...this poll of 1961ers i think says a lot about the truth of gen jones: http://sev.prnewswire.com/publishing-information-services/20080804/NEM05504082008-1.html i think obama is a classic joneser, they say booms are idealistic, x cynical, and jones practical idealists, which obama seems very much to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. I prefer Strauss and Howe's 1991 definition of Generation X.
They put it at 1961-1981, because:

The generation receives its name because it's the 13th to know the flag of the United States (counting back to the peers of Benjamin Franklin). Strauss and Howe defined the birth years of the 13th Generation as 1961 to 1981 based on examining peaks and troughs in cultural trends rather than simply looking at birth rates.<1> Howe and Strauss speak of six influences that they believe have shaped Generation 13. These influences are as follows

* Readily-accessible birth control
* Legalization of abortion on demand
* Increase in divorce
* Increase in mothers in the work place
* The Zero Population movement
* "Devil-child films"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generations_%28book%29
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestPerspective Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. the reason strauss and howe's work is becoming so discredited is because...
given the acceleration of culture, generations are shorter now, this view is widely held among gen experts...unfortunately for s & h, their cycles are based on rigid 20 year lengths that don't allow for the fact that gens are more like 10 to 15 years these days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I don't see Strauss and Howe being discredited.
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 10:46 PM by Writer
And what other gen experts are you quoting?

Also, if you review the generation cohorts listed in their book, you see that they absolutely DON'T use neat 20-year brackets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestPerspective Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. google it and you'll see their work has been under serious attack...
and google gen experts and you'll see what i'm saying is true...although tragically strauss died 6 months ago...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. What sort of google search should I do?
Can you give me a link of at least one source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestPerspective Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. the regular kind...
i'm sorry, im trying to do 4 things at once right now, and cant really continue here, but its like any other research, put in "generation expert" with quotation marks and read what ypou find, the first person that comes to mind on gen length is gail sheehy whos been on my mind cause her husband just died...shes not purely a gen expert but has written much about gens and is generally respected, she says gens are 12 to 15 years...gotta run...enjoy the research, fascinating stuff i think...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TuxedoKat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
53. Well...
I think you have to be born during the cusp to feel it (Jones period for me). I never felt like I was fully a Boomer but definitely don't feel like an X'er, although I do remember feeling some of the things experienced by your generation, alienation, lack of opportunities, etc.

With all due respect to Strauss and Howe, I think if one was age four or older in 1968 and lived through the deaths of MLK and RFK, and all the war protests and later witnessing Watergate and the end of the Vietnam War, one would definitely have some Boomer characteristics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. 1970 here, and I have to admit some of those 'myths' describe me to a T
or an X, I suppose. :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. 1973
Total X'er . . .


I know I'm not alone that a lot of us who were cynical assholes 15 years ago (myself included) are cynical assholes now (myself included). This election year has been rough for me. I'm watching all of these young "Millenials" all excited and it makes me excited - but then again I'm thinking, "Okay Pollyannas. Enough. Go get yourself a copy of Reality Bites or Higher Education and throw in some Stone Temple Pilots, Arrested Development or Cowboy Junkies then get back to me."

To me? Obama is tail end Boomer. Seriously -all that happy happy joy joy is infectious . . . He kind of reminds me of my mom. She was born in 47. But deep down inside I don't buy any of that happIness for myself. :rofl:Disaster can strike at any minute and all you can do is survive.

I'm a Cynical Asshole Gen X-er. I can't help myself. It's just who I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Obama distances himself from Boomers, so I don't think he identifies with them...
but maybe he does? I don't know. It's hard to differentiate between the politician from his marketing strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestPerspective Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
30. Those born 1961 tell pollsters they are GenJones, not Boom or GenX in new poll out today
Very interesting poll released today, because of Obama's birthday...ThirdAge (a big website for mid-life aged people) commissioned a poll of a nationally representative sample of 500 people born in 1961 (the same year as Obama) to try to determine Obama's generational identity. 57% chose Generation Jones while only 22% chose Boomer, and only 21% chose Xer.

Some very interesting stuff about this here: http://www.generationjones.com/2008election.html

And here: http://sev.prnewswire.com/publishing-information-services/20080804/NEM05504082008-1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
31. I was born in 1971, but I make people who were born in 1961 honorary Gen Xers.
They seem to be more like Gen Xers than Boomers to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
35. I don't dig those categorizations...
...I think it's a lot simpler than that.

If your parents fought in WWII, you're a Boomer.

If your grandparents fought in WWII, you're an Xer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpookyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #35
56. Sweet! I'm a 40 y/o Boomer then! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
44. What generation am I?
I was born in '90.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. I think you're considered a Millennial. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. That sounds fancy.
I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Hehe. Check out Strauss and Howe's discussions on Millennials in their writing.
You would find it interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TuxedoKat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #44
52. You're a Millenial...
the next greatest generation (like the GI generations - WWII vets), according to Strauss and Howe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. The "Greatest Generation"? Wow. They're not even 30 yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TuxedoKat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. Ah well, give them some time.
If they show up at the polls for Obama this November they will be on their way to proving Strauss and Howe right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpookyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
55. 1968, so firmly a X'er...
what's weird though, is that my parents were in their early 40's when I was born, so they were a generation removed...my friends' dads were Vietnam vets, but mine was a WWII vet, and they were children of the Depression, so my outlook on some things is oddly skewed.

Plenty cynical though, oh my yes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
58. Born on Jan. 4th 1976 here.
I'm pretty sure that makes me an X'er.

Yes, many of us are cynical because previous generations had it easier than we do. For example, the early boomers were able to go to college without graduating with massive debt. Also, the average home price was like only 2.5 times the average salary when they were my age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC