Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stagecraft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:27 PM
Original message
Stagecraft
Edited on Thu Jul-31-08 06:37 PM by NanceGreggs
An open letter to Mr. Jon Klein
President - CNN/U.S.

Sir:

On July 25th, CNN’s Campbell Brown “reported” on a Congressional hearing inquiring into the scope of executive power, and the possible abuse thereof by G.W. Bush and his administration.

“Believe it or not, there was a congressional hearing today about impeaching the president,” said Ms. Brown, who added, “It was all stagecraft, though.”

Let me begin by stating what should be obvious: If your network is going to continue to identify itself as a news network, presenting Ms. Brown’s air-headed opinion in place of actual coverage of the hearing is not merely a lapse in judgment, but a blatant attempt to distort and/or dismiss a proceeding of vital importance to all American citizens.

Ms. Brown went on to introduce a report by CNN’s Erica Hill with the words, “Tell us about this piece of Kabuki theater, Erica.”

Again the idea that a “news” station would allow one of its on-air staff to dismiss serious testimony surrounding possible crimes committed by the president and his administration as “Kabuki theater” can only be described as a truly mind-boggling lack of journalistic responsibility.

Ms. Brown then ended by saying: “So this is really just stagecraft, not to mention a real waste of taxpayer money and Congress’ time.” Thanks again, Ms. Brown, for your totally worthless opinion.

The (fortunately) few times I have seen Ms. Brown in action, she has repeatedly used the word “stagecraft”. While I realize that a woman of limited intelligence will, by virtue of that fact, also have a limited vocabulary, perhaps you could educate her – along with the rest of your on-air staff – in the proper meaning and use of the word.

I assure you this would not be a daunting task, or one that would tax even Ms. Brown’s meager intellect. A viewing of footage from CNN’s own archives would suffice, as your network has consistently profferred state-of-the art stagecraft as actual news.

Over the past seven years, CNN has devoted hours of coverage to Bush’s speeches, and events like the toppling of the statue of Saddam Hussein. And yet, to my knowledge, you have never informed your viewers that these events were “staged”, right down to the inclusion of hand-picked audiences and paid participants.

Perhaps the most glaring example of same was Bush’s appearance in NOLA in the aftermath of Katrina, where he spoke surrounded by first-aid/food/water distribution stations, and equipment allegedly flown-in at the president’s insistence to immediately begin the task of assisting that city’s residents.

Of course, it was later reported in blogs across the country, and in newspapers of note around the globe, that these “props” were packed-up and removed within minutes of Bush’s photo-op coming to an end.

That, sir, is stagecraft of the highest order – and yet your network persists in broadcasting such blatant displays of fakery, created and televised solely for the purpose of misleading the public.

As it is abundantly apparent that your network does not understand the meaning of stagecraft, allow me to explain it in terms that even you can understand:

Stagecraft is representing yourself to the public as a news network, when what you actually offer is scripted opinion, presented with extreme bias against Democrats and liberals, and a more-than-obvious favoritism towards the present administration and the corporate interests of your owners.

Stagecraft is prattling on incessantly about missing teenagers and celebrity gossip, along with a hefty dose of right-wing talking points, and passing it off as “news”, while, at the same time, ignoring actual news stories that would serve to inform the citizenry of what is taking place in their own country, and especially within their own government.

Stagecraft is identifying teleprompter-readers as journalists and investigative reporters, introducing people who are nothing more than shills for the right-wing agenda as respected political analysts, and referring to a group of appallingly misinformed hacks as "the Best Political Team on TV".

I will not be so hypocritical as to say I expected better of CNN - because I don't, and haven't for years. However, I must admit to a certain sense of shock at seeing what used to be a somewhat obscured bias now so blatantly displayed without even a pretense of fairness and balance.

I realize that expressing my utter disgust with your organization’s conduct, along with behavior of your on-air staff, will have no impact nor prompt any changes.

However, I would appeal to whatever shred of decency you may have left and ask that, at the very least, your network cease using the term “news network” and present itself as what it is: a collection of spinmeisters with little of value to say, and even less integrity with which to say it.

With all due respect,
NanceGreggs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. TOUCHE !!..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm holding my breath as you await a response from these folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
49. I'm sure you'll be missed by many.
:+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Sorry, I can't hear you. I'm dead to me now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. RECOMMENDED!! great post and great letter
This Action Alert from FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3584


Action Alert


CNN Scoffs at White House Critics



Anchor with Bush ties dismisses abuse-of-power hearings as 'stagecraft'

7/31/08

CNN's Election Center program devoted a July 25 report to mocking a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee investigating White House abuses of power.

"Believe it or not, there was a congressional hearing today about impeaching the president," scoffed host Campbell Brown, who added: "It was all stagecraft, though." Brown went on to introduce the report by CNN correspondent Erica Hill by saying, "Tell us about this piece of Kabuki theater, Erica."

Hill explained: "From the beginning it was pretty clear this was all just stagecraft, for what one Republican lawmaker deemed impeachment light." Hill underscored this notion by claiming: "The Democratic leadership made it clear impeachment is not on the table at this hearing today for two reasons. Not only is there not enough time left in President Bush's term, but also they know any real impeachment hearings at this point could cause a major backlash."

It's difficult to know exactly who Hill is referring to; at the hearings she was apparently covering, there was scarce mention of a potential "backlash" from voters, nor was there much time spent determining precisely when it might be too late to bring impeachment hearings. More typical were comments from Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), responding to the sentiment that impeachment would be "overzealous partisanship":


But I ask, would impeachment be a vehicle to restore life and vitality to the delicate system of checks and balances, which is the hallmark of our Constitution and which this administration has shattered--aided and abetted by the do-nothing, Republican-controlled, rubber-stamp Congress which failed to exercise its constitutional responsibility to oversee the operations of the executive branch of our government?


Johnson went on enumerate the criticisms of the White House:

Warrantless wiretapping of Americans; torturing and kidnapping and detaining numerous prisoners, foreign enemy combatants, prisoners, whatever they could be classified as; the fact that we have become a severely surveilled population now with the abuses of the Patriot Act--all done under the cloak of government secrecy. Political spying; the attacks on academic freedom; the politicization of the Justice Department; selective prosecutions--so many areas fertile for inquiring by this Congress.


Host Campbell Brown closed the report by saying: "All right. So this is really just stagecraft, not to mention a real waste of taxpayer money and Congress' time." Needless to say, the suggestion that looking into the weighty matters addressed by the hearing is a "waste of taxpayer money" is a remarkable statement from a supposedly unbiased anchor.

It is worth noting that Brown is married to Dan Senor, who was a deputy press secretary for George W. Bush before becoming the chief spokesperson for the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq. (He's currently a Fox News analyst.) Given that much of the discussion of executive malfeasance concerns the Iraq War, it is inappropriate for Brown to even be covering an investigation of abuses of power that involve her husband's former associates--let alone for her to dismiss such inquiries as a waste of time and money. If CNN had been around in 1974, would it have allowed the spouse of a former Nixon spokesperson to report on the Watergate hearings?

The report closed with Hill assuring voters that George W. Bush was not threatened by any of this: "As for the president today, clearly, not too worried about this hearing. He was in Peoria, Illinois. As you can see here, kissing babies, smiling, taking pictures." The two CNN reporters then mused about the difficulties in getting babies to wear sunglasses--all of this mere moments after they derided Congress for wasting time with a investigation of White House abuses of power.

ACTION:

Ask CNN why an investigation of abuses of power by elected officials was treated as fodder for humor and not serious reporting. And ask Campbell Brown why she didn't recuse herself from commenting on an inquiry into wrongdoing by her husband's political associates.

CONTACT:

CNN Election Center
Webform: http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form4.html?125

Anchor Campbell Brown
Email: Campbell@cnn.com

CNN President Jonathan Klein
telephone 212 275 8263

Watch clip from CNN's July 25 Election Center program at: http://youtube.com/watch?v=bzx6ttmbTbs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Thanks for posting all the necesary info!
As I have posted before, I have been on CNN's Ignore list for a while now.

I used to send them emails from time to time, always negative but never inclusive of bad language, etc. However, when I try to send emails now I get a message stating that I do not have permission to access their email accounts.

If anyone here is willing to email this for me, I would be most appreciative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlevans Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
50. If you really are serious, I would be delighted
to email this to them. My sole concern would be that of attribution of authorship. I would feel guilty if your writings were thought to have originated with me; while my own writing is, I think, adequate for ordinary communications, I lack your fine turns of phrase. On the other hand, were I to send it, attributing it to you, would they not simply reject it out of hand? If you see a way out of that particular dilemma, I am willing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Yes, please do send it.
I'm not concerned about a mistaken attribution. My name is clearly written at the bottom of the letter - besides, it's not like they are going to read it on-air!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. They seem to
always accuse us of using the very tactics they are using on us. It really is quite amazing. What ms Campbell was doing "was" stagecraft.......Lol :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. With all due respect
in other words, with the contempt you have earned...great letter. i hope he reads it. one can dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngharry Donating Member (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. Campbell Brown
Campbell Brown (and her husband) are right-wing Republicans. She never misses a chance to eviscerate any positives for Democrats and to push Republicans, from the Bush Crime Family to John McCain. She is NOT a journalist, but a petty propagandist and needs to be fired if CNN is to retain its' reputation..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
72. Campbell Brown is married to Dan Senor, Iraq War spokesperson and Faux News contributor.
In other words, the lowest of the low. He is a fucking creep, and those who know my posts here know I never use that word.

Have to this time. Campbell Brown has done crap like this over and over again, she's a Right Winger, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. I miss Walter Cronkite
we are approaching my 4 year anniversary of the complete abandonment of the Electronic Fireplace as a source of news and information. CNN's coverage of Edward's speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention, featuring color commentary by Ralph Reed, was the final straw, and I have not looked back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I hear ya!
CNN was, once upon a time, my go-to source of information. I stopped watching on a regular basis after the Clinton impeachment fiasco, and quit them completely after the 2000 election debacle.

I only see it now "by accident", when I'm rounding-the-horn with the remote looking for something of interest to watch.

What a sad end to a network that showed such promise in its early days ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
69. Haven't watched CNN in years. Yuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. The corporate media literally don't care about the people, the people's interests,
or journalistic integrity.

Power, money and influence are their Gods.

The one silver lining around the cloud is, the more they worship those Gods, the quicker they will lose them. They're killing the goose that has given them the golden eggs, that being the people's measure of faith and trust in the press.

The American People are waking up the corporate media's betrayal and their will be an accounting.

Thanks for the thread, Nancy.

Kicked and recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. You NAILED it, Uncle Joe!
"They're killing the goose that has given them the golden eggs, that being the people's measure of faith and trust in the press."

Not so astonishingly (given the incredible lack of intelligence demonstrated by the corporate media of late), they have yet to make the connection between the fact that as BushCo goes down for being untrustworthy and not credible, so do the enabling cheerleaders go down with him.

They are still displaying the attitude that just because Bush is down to a 24-point favorability rating, the public still trusts US 100 percent.

While the arrogance of the MSM is galling, their lack of understanding of their own tenuous situation is downright entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. While I agree that these are not the right people to call what happened "stagecraft",
is it not, in fact, stagecraft? Worse yet, I think it's stagecraft set up for We The People. Call me cynical, for, at this point, that's exactly what I am. Fool me once and all that hooha.

That said, CNN needs to be slapped as hard and as often, maybe more often, as Faux "News". In fact, they should be exposed more vociferously, because many, if not most, people recognize Faux as the RW propoganda shills that they are, but CNN used to be something of a news organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Kabuki theatre", the latest RW dismissive. As if they could find Japan on a map.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. yep, they'll use any exotic sounding words to make DEMS appear foreign eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. Kabuki is
a very beautiful, very structured, very stylized style of theatre. I don't see the similarities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. There are none. Some Republican said it and it sounded intelligent, so these people parrot it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dear Jon Klein:
What Nance said.

-rucky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateboomer Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. I emailed CNN the day after that aired.
I complained that there coverage was obviously biased and I wouldn't be watching CNN from now on. I haven't received a reply....not that I expected one.....

:argh:

Thanks for posting your comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. me too
and switched my news channel to msnbc-- i sure hope its better than cnn. :toast: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladym55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Limit your viewing to Olbermann
NBC/MSNBC is owned by GE ... can we say corporate???? They have the great and wonderful Chris Matthews and Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan.

The only two bright spots on MSNBC are Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddowe. Otherwise, it's unquestioning right-wing talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. bravo
r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R....if only integrity and professionalism mattered to the likes of Klein
On behalf of those of us who care enough to notice the difference.....Nicely Done, Nance! :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cabbage08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. CNN proved they are on orders by the White House with this stagecrafted rhetoric
There is NO possible way Ms Brown thought up those talking points on her own. She doesn't seem highly intellectual like a E. Edwards, or a R. Maddow. This woman is good at taking orders, and spewing direct propaganda prepared and written for her by Rove or his servlings... It all seemed heavily Foxisized...

CNN employees who are in the know about your following the corporate line, you should feel deep shame for working for a false "news" organization. You should expose them if you ever read these comments of ours.

Great job, Nance... GIVE 'EM HELL!


MORE AT ----- www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. That's why I don't watch a 'news' program that is controlled
by The House Of Saud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. That's outrageous
Even in today's atmosphere of ubiquitous pseudo-journalism, that performance by Campbell Brown is reaching for a new low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
24. Beautiful job.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladym55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. Campbell Brown is an empty-headed right-winger
If you want to know her areas of expertise, try designer shoes and partying. Don't expect her to bore herself with actually grasping current events or history or boring stuff like that.

Ms. Brown was scripted. She truly can't come up with such big words as "stagecraft" on her own. That's TWO WHOLE SYLLABLES.

Too bad that she didn't decide to be a good Republican wife and do the right thing once her baby arrived ... I do believe that Republican wives are SUPPOSED to stay home in the mcmansion and raise the babies. It's the whole family values thing!!!

I do believe it's time for everybody to turn off corporate news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
28. K&R Exceedingly well done! A bit of balm for my rage ...
... after seeing what you've described, and feeling rather helpless to do anything about it.

I think perhaps these news models have injured their heads as they ascended through the marble ceiling on their way to great succes as "women."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
30. I gave up on CNN a while back
I've written them a few times and never got a reply of any kind. MSNBC is the only news channel I watch now and when I write them, I get a response.

The only person at CNN worth a damn is Jack Cafferty but I can hardly sit through Wolf Blitzer in order to see Jack. How on earth did Blitzer become so successful? He has the personality of a damp dish rag and a voice that puts me to sleep.

Great letter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
31. Clearly not unbiased reporting, even though she's right.
I fully agree with her that hearings into impeaching the President are purely an exercise in theatre, with no possibility of achieving anything, but describing them as such is *not* unbiased reporting, and describing them (again, sadly, correctly) as "a real waste of taxpayer money and Congress time" isn't even pretending to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
32. They wonder why their ratings are so poor
What you wrote is precisely why I do not watch CNN; why I boycott ABC; and after years of tuning in, why I gave up on CBS when Dan Rather left. Faux News isn't even an option for my viewing habits - I'm not mad at myself to endure their blatant bells and whistles propaganda!

Ted Turner had the right idea when he first started CNN - he did not want to make 'celebrity' newsreaders. He wanted the news to be the 'star'. Too bad they changed the paradigm. Imagine the money they'd save on those multi-million dollar info-tainer salaries.

Just give me the unbiased information. I'd be a faithful customer of that format, along with millions of others.

This letter is one of your best postings, Nance. May I use it to send out?

I believe in the First Amendment. Yet, I truly wish we could explore how to legally hold these corporations accountable. There is a public trust involved whether they are on paid cable channels or not. Wording may be the key. If you call yourself news, then by God, you ought to report just the facts and keep your opinions to the fully disclosed op-ed part of the show - which would once again allow time for disagreeing viewpoints - as in the days before the Reagan administration killed that law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
33. With all DUE respect.....
i.e. none

My father was a print journalist in Washington. He was awarded many citations from
journalistic organizations, as well as being cited in the Congressional Record by
members of Congress from both right and left as the highest example of objectivity
and integrity. He despaired at what had become of his profession when the media helped
turn the impeachment of Bill Clinton into the media circus it was. But seeing what
has become of journalism under the imposters pretending to be members of his profession
today, if his cancer hadn't killed him eight years ago, the cancer affecting journalism
today would have.

One would almost hope that under a President Obama, a Justice Department worthy of the
name (or a Federal Communication Commission out to do its job) would prosecute, under
the Truth in Advertising law, propaganda organizations claiming to be journalists. I
know, I know. It'll never happen. Free speech and all that. Smoking is good for you,
and fresh vegetables are bad for you, too.

The mere fact that Wolf Blitzer has to say the words "best political team on television"
about forty times a day says it all. If you have to make that claim THAT often, it's
rather obvious that they are trying to hard-sell a product whose merits are so hidden,
the public needs it mashed in their faces several times an hour, because they certainly
wouldn't have thought so otherwise.

Are these people in cahoots with Diebold, just trying to prepare us for another phony
outcome of another fraudulent presidential election ("surprising McCain upset!!")? And
if not, other than money, what in the world is their motivation for this mockery of the
profession once know as journalism (apologies to Prince)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
34. You Mean Mrs. Dan Senor...
I guess there's a new "journalist stylebook" out there that must weigh a ton...I never saw such words included in my copy.

Unfortunately due to the coporate media and toadies like Mrs. Senor, our entire political system has become stagecraft...also our judiciary. At least the impeachment hearings brough out some of the crimes committed against this country, while Mrs. Senor and her beltway bubbleheads spew their gosspi and spin and expect us to respect that.

Nance...the lady deserves no respect.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
35. Very well done.
I never watch CNN anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
36. Rather than feeling chastised,
Edited on Fri Aug-01-08 08:42 AM by Jakes Progress
the CNN group just gave themselves a high five for a job well done and handed a bonus check to Campbell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sourmilk Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
37. Here's your friggin' STAGECRAFT, Campbell:
REP. DENNIS J. KUCINICH, D-OHIO:

"Thank you very much for being here.

We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights; that, among these, are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the government; and, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it.

These words from the Declaration of Independence are instructive at this moment. Because not only whenever any form of government, but whenever any government official becomes destructive of the founding purposes, that official or those officials must be held accountable.

Because I believe the vice president's conduct of office has been destructive to the founding purposes of our nation. Today, I have introduced House Resolution 333, Articles of Impeachment Relating to Vice President Richard B. Cheney. I do so in defense of the rights of the American people to have a government that is honest and peaceful.

It became obvious to me that this vice president, who was a driving force for taking the United States into a war against Iraq under false pretenses, is once again rattling the sabers of war against Iran with the same intent to drive America into another war, again based on false pretenses."


Now please just STFU, Campbell!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
38. Now THAT is what I'm talking about!!
You've inspired me Nance! I'll shooting off an email right now! You read them but good "gurl"!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
39. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FraDon Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
40. Bullseye, Nance!
cc: FCC, all Journalism schools
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theFrankFactor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
41. Thank You Nance!
I have a little video about this "stagecraft" bullshit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nmpTbmiRTg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
42. I wish I'd written that. Perfect, Nance.
You already said it: they won't read, heed or acknowledge your missives. But I'm sure that just writing it made you feel better.

The best ways any of us can affect these propaganda networks is 1) NOT WATCH THEM and 2) DON'T BUY THEIR SPONSORS' PRODUCTS AND WRITE THE SPONSORS AND TELL THEM WHY YOU'RE NOT BUYING.

I wish it were just CNN, but it's ALL OF THE MAJOR NETWORKS. They're a waste of time. Better, more accurate, less biased info on line.

Thanks for posting this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
43. You inspired me Nance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
44. INCREDIBLE LETTER!
They should hire you, Nance, and give you your own show.

Thanks for taking the time to write CNN. I did as well, although my letter was not as eloquent as yours.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveFool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
45. bravo, well done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
46. An enthusiastic K&R!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
47. I hope you actually mailed this
and this isn't just for us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
48. Anyone watching these "news" shows still --- ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
52. This is why I can't watch...
I can feel my blood pressure rising just reading about Brown's shilling.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
54. Open letters are nice. But mailed letters are better. Did you mail this one? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. E-mails are ignored & deleted. A hnadwritten letter gets more
attention, since that is rare these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
56. K&R, while Fox News has been losing viewership...

CNN (Cable Non-News) seems to be filling the void.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FirstLight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
57. Your words always get straight to the heart of the matter
Thanks Nance, and if I thought for a moment that a letter form me would make a difference, I'd be right there. Unfortunately, the facist takeover is nearly complete and the media/propaganda has been in place for quite some time.

I was a journalist in the late 90's and worked for a small local paper. Even then it uspet me to no end to see how the news was held back or altered in its structure so as not to "offend" the big advertizers. But I was still young and idealistic, so I wrote whatever they would let me write, and even got an award winning column out of the Presidential visit of Clinton to Tahoe and getting to meet him. I worked that day as a runner for ABC news, and what I saw of the washington press corps really blew away any misconceptions I had.

They had no desire to find out about the whys and hows or the whats of the story. It was all sound bytes and fractions of the reality...I was there and can tell you some amazing things were said by both Clinton and Gore, and the Washoe Tribe council as well. I always thought it was important to UNDERSTAND the background and the important issues of any story, but it was more like a PR junkett for a summer movie than a real hard news story. And I used to be intimidated by these people...? not anymore.

Recently I called UNR to find out about completeing my BA in Journalism. I was hoping to get some credit for my extended years in the field and as a freelancer. The dean of the Jurnalism school said that the kind of work I had been doing isn't "real" journalism. I neded to start from scratch and learn all the fancy editing and software, etc... and that multimedia was where it was at compared to print journalism...And he said a significant part of the cirriculum was PR & marketing...I told him if I wanted to go into sales and marketing I would have gone to that department. I THOUGHT I was talking to the Journalism school. He said that it is such a big part of news today that a news organization wouldn't want me unless I knew that too.
I'm sorry...excuuse me?
Whatever happened to just knowing your beat and having a knowledge of the ISSUES? Journalists should be taking classes in Sociology, Human issues, Conservation, ecology...etc...to KNOW the PEOPLE they are supposed to be reporting for and to. ARGH!

when did journalists forget their main duty was to be the watchdogs of government and society?
when did journalism become entertainment? It has been creeping in like a silent cancer and taking over for decades...but this administration's use and abuse of the media is not only sick, but DAMN wrong!

So much for being an idealist in the world today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
58. Wikipedia shows that her father was a Democrat who almost certainly was framed in a politically
motivated bogus prosecution. I wonder what he would say about this. I wonder how she feels the way that the insurance companies and collaborated to stage his jail term?

http://www.jimbrownla.com/about_jim/index.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_H._%22Jim%22_Brown


Late in 1999, just two weeks before the Louisiana primary election, Brown was indicted for lying to the FBI during a routine investigation. He still won a solid victory despite the indictment. Brown received 426,098 ballots (57 percent) to 319,124 for the Republican candidate, Allen I. Boudreaux, Jr., a New Orleans attorney who specialized in insurance law and was the director of the state Motor Vehicle Division under Republican Governor Murphy J. "Mike" Foster, Jr. Turnout was lighter in the 1999 primary than in earlier ones in which Brown had been a candidate for office because Foster was headed to an easy reelection. More than forty newspapers endorsed Brown's reelection that year.

Many came to Brown's defense. "People who know Brown or know his reputation, including members of the press, know the charges against him are politically motivated hooey," wrote the now defunct Shreveport Journal on October 15, 1999.

Brown was sworn in for his third term in January 2000. His crackdown on fraud netted the arrest of five insurance agents accused of fraudulent insurance activities.

As his time as commissioner wound down, Brown announced another accomplishment: Allstate Insurance lifted its freeze on issuing new homeowners insurance policies in Louisiana. Thereafter, Brown declared that State Farm would rebate $31.5 million to auto policyholders in Louisiana, and a few days later, the company pronounced a $19.5 million rate rollback. Brown cited measures that he implemented, such as "no pay, no play", impoundment, and a crackdown on drunk drivers as one of the reasons for the lower automobile rates.

Though he steadfastly denied having lied to an FBI agent during an investigation, Brown was convicted and served six months in federal prison in Oakdale in Allen Parish. He resigned and was succeeded by his first deputy, J. Robert Wooley, a Democrat, who in turn would win the seat in the 2003 general election. Wooley resigned as insurance commissioner on February 15, 2006, and was succeeded by his first deputy, James J. "Jim" Donelon of Jefferson Parish, a former Republican member of the Louisiana state House of Representatives. Donelon is pledged to restoring public confidence in the department. He was narrowly elected to the 15-month unexpired term for the position in the special election held on September 30, 2006. Donelon defeated two candidates, principally a Republican state senator from Dry Creek in Beauregard Parish, James David Cain.

Brown writes extensively on Louisiana politics and public affairs through his Internet blog. Though his training is in law, his knowledge of Louisiana history and politics is seemingly unlimited. Brown sometimes teaches classes in Louisiana history, of which he is an undisputed authority, at both Tulane and Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
59. Jeebus - do we even HAVE real journalists anymore?
This is one of the many, many reasons I don't watch TV news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
60. I couldn't agree more, Nance.
I saw that "news" piece with Ms. Brown and Ms. Hill, and was appalled. Those two threw out ANY pretense of being newscasters or reporters, and just went blatently full-on as the shills they are.

Had I been in the room with them, I would have gob-smacked both of them until they saw stars! :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
61. You NEVER disappoint!!!
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
62. Don't waste your time with TV Noos. Read Nance Greggs instead :D k+r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
63. I get NONE of my news from the boob tube
I try to read from unbiased news sources as much as possible but have found even them riddled with polluted thoughts injected by M$M. Understanding what you are seeing and where it comes would seem like one first rules to me. Healing the entire world is not possible so choosing logical choices seems like an alternative to me. Turn the crap off already :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guyton Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
64. wow
You're able to watch CNN? Wow.

I haven't had the stomach to watch that propaganda channel in years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Actually, I don't.
And I only saw this Brown thing because it's all over the internetz tubes.

I did, however, catch Brown a few weeks ago. I was going through the channels, looking for something else, when I saw an interview with Obama, Michele and the girls.

After the interview, I realized it was CNN, when Brown started calling the entire interview - you guessed it - "stagecraft".

If I had a buck for every time that airhead uses the word "stagecraft", I'd be posting this from my mortgage-free villa in Spain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackDragna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
66. A valiant effort, but you're wasting your breath (or typing).
CNN has long been a den of scandal, simplistic reporting and butt-kissing anyone who wraps themselves in the flag. Their behavior is inexcusable, but unfortunately we can't do much to change it until the government steps in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
67. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
68. On point
:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
70. Wow, I missed this. This is one of the reasons I quit watching CNN.
It's bad enough that their "reporters" are just teleprompter readers, but for them to start making judgements about politics while sitting at a news desk - that's pure horseshit.

And if I wanted to see such horseshit, I would watch Faux Snooze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Ected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
71. You Know What Really Galls Me, Nancy?
That the right-wing hate radio jockies continue to bash CNN as part of the "liberal media", and their mindless listeners nod their heads in consent, when in fact the opposite is true.

Hannity and Limbaugh and Company NEED to bash the straw man "liberal media" to survive...but there is NO SUCH THING.

They get to have their cake and eat it too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC