|
I read an article today in the local paper about a homicide that reminded me of something that happened over 30 years ago that has always shaped my thinking about newspapers.
This was in Los Angeles. I was casually acquainted with a man who ended up the victim of a homicide by multiple gunshot wounds. The newspaper account described the man as married, father of three, hard working, reliable, well liked by all his friends and neighbors, worked two jobs to put himself through some kind of trade school to better himself.
What I knew first hand was that he was a drug addict and a drug dealer. He was physically abusive to his wife and children. The wife's family had called child services on him several times for leaving drugs out where the kids could get into them, and leaving loaded handguns out where the children could get to them. Virtually everyone who knew him thought he was a mean bastard and most everyone agreed that not only did they NOT like him, but actively despised the S.O.B.
Clearly the newspaper interviewed a couple neighbors in the apartment building who really didn't know the guy and printed what they were told as the gospel. Clearly the police knew what was up because they fingered the drug dealer who pulled the trigger in pretty short order. But the newspaper didn't have a clue.
That first hand experience taught me that probably 90% of everything you read in the newspapers is pure B.S. either collected from source who don't have a clue, made up on the spot, or distorted beyond all recognition.
That's why I take it with a HUGE grain of salt when I read stories about police tazering a helpless 12-year old, or some similar outrage that has us eagerly jumping to the conclusion that we live in a police state.
Before over-reacting, stop, take a deep breath, and consider that the newspaper story is probably 90% B.S., and that it is virtually certain that many very significant facts were left out of the story.
We all, as a country, need to grow up and mellow out and stop jumping immediately to whatever conclusion best fits our political bias. We don't need for the population to keep their fingers on a hair trigger waiting for some fresh outrage to explode over.
(End of rant)
|