|
Edited on Sat Jul-26-08 08:27 AM by UTUSN
We should have had a series all along labelled like Octafish's "Know your B.F.E.E.," for Tweety and Faux, when we document those two propagandizing for Shrub-- CHURCHILL and "war pResident" references.
When it's about Tweety, call it, "If it's not FAUX, it's Tweety."
So this A.M. they had this "cultural expert" on claiming that he "sees" veiled (masked) references to Shrub in the Dark Knight: to wit, that they both HAD
* "to fight terrorists"
* "to resort to violence to combat violence"
* "to push the limits of (violating) our civil liberties"
* and the kicker, "to sacrifice their popularity among the people they were protecting."
They said there was no Robin, per se, but that (some deputy commisioner or somesuch in the movie) was in charge of turning on and turning off (the civil liberties, and that THIS was CHEENEE.
The "cultural expert" also twisted what we have all heard in literature classes, that in times of political repression, authors resort to code language and symbolism as in fables, fantasy, and science fiction, to communicate messages of freedom. He PERVERTED this observation to say that Batman/Shrub was MASKED because (something like, unpopular to praise him right now). The "cultural expert" said that when movies are UNmasked and are openly LIBERAL, they become "boring," like Rendition or (the anti-Iraq one). Barf!1
ON EDIT (this paragraph): Oh, and the disgusting capper: The "expert" said that he could see the comparisons SO clearly, that by the end of the movie he expected to see a "W" flashed in the spotlight into the sky!1
I don't go to movies just for pleasure much except for a new Hamlet or Gladiator, and I make a special effort when something politically controversial comes along (Passion of the Christ, Brokeback Mountain)-------but I definitely will NOT be seeing Dark Knight.
|