Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Repuke Customers of IndyMac Refuse To Take Government Handout from FDIC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 08:57 PM
Original message
Repuke Customers of IndyMac Refuse To Take Government Handout from FDIC
and are willing to lose their money, no questions asked. up to $100,000 in checking/savings accounts plus 50% of whatever is above that amount. or the $250,000 in cd accounts. true to their word and standing on republicon principle--it's the price they are willing to pay for the free market rule--the market has decided and the bank went under and they don't believe in government bailouts/handouts. because they are not hypocrites and detest government involvement in business they will not be accepting any fdic money.




:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:


HA! YEAH, SURE!

i bet these republicon motherfuckers are glad as hell that they are fdic insured for at least the amount that is being offered. maybe they should learn from this real life lesson, thank their lucky fucking stars they have this "federal deposit insurance corporation" to rescue their ass and imagine what the hell they would have done without this "socialist" program there to pull their sorry asses from the well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because they believe so strongly in the "free market".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yes. exactly. they are pillars of republicon example--all those refusing that
insurance money. wow. so impressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'll bet that they're just going to pull themselves up by their bootstraps
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. They're so much better than those welfare queens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. One thing's for darned sure
There won't be any whining about it from Republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well you knew they would didn't you?
They are always true to there ideology ain't they?
I never doubted it for a minute...

:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. FDIC Insurance isn't government money
They get all their income from assessments of banks and interest earnings. The banks essentially fund the insurance pool, not our taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. ....
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 09:17 PM by ingac70
Then why did the S&L crisis in the late '80's cost US taxpayers $150 billion?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Deposit_Insurance_Corporation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It was overwhelmed...
.... by the catastrophic number of S&L failures, and did have to get tax money just to pull itself back up to "insolvent".

That might possibly happen to the FDIC, if things get much worse. The FDIC is considering raising its assessment level on banks due to the expected losses from Indymac. But thus far, it's been banks footing the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. hum...
http://www.fdic.gov/about/learn/symbol/index.html

a .gov website not a government agency. i didn't know anyone could get a .gov web address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Sigh....
I didn't say the FDIC isn't a government agency.

I said the FDIC collects assessments they make on banks, and that banks fund the FDIC insurance, not the government. Seriously, it's that easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Hmm...S&Ls fail under GHWB, banks fail under GWB...
Like father, like son...

But son definitely outdid father exponentially in terms of national debt and economic failure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exothermic Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Uh, your own link explains it.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. This is correct
Effectively the FDIC is a government owned and managed insurance company, funded by contributions from the member banks.

i.e. - FDIC money is not taxpayer money. It is bank money that was set aside to pay for bank failures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exothermic Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. The 50% in excess of the limit is simply what they can take out RIGHT NOW.
There is no reason they cannot get it ALL in the near future...unless, perhaps, every depositor is as fucking stupid as the ones who didn't know how it works.
:grr:

no sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. Just Imagine What Would Have Been If They Had Privitized
Social security...indexed it to the market. We'd have thousands of elderly on the streets by now with more on the way.

GOOpers feel they are entitled to EVERYTHING and not have to be responsible about anything. If they have money, it's THEIR money and no one should touch it. It doesn't matter how they earned it, just leave it alone and let them earn even more. It's the "American Way".

Many people good hoodwinked with the game that your savings are safe and that once you earn the money it will always grow. And 2% isn't good enough, they wanted 10% or more...c'mon, they're entitled. So when the system collapses, they now feel they are entitled to their money back...even if it comes from everyone elses pockets...especially Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. 2% growth can't keep pace with inflation
one purpose of long term investments is to outpace inflation growth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. Oh I dunno about that.. I can hear my republican brother now
'WHY SHOULDN'T I KEEP IT? IT'S MY GODDAMNED MONEY!!!!1!1111!!"

That's the first thing he'd say and if he had his money in that bank and he'd be first in line to get it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'm sure they are very offended by this sort of SOCIALIZED banking protecting them.
How dare the government look after their well being.
:sarcasm:

Republicans are ALWAYS the very first in line demanding that the government pay them what they are DUE first, because they deserve and need it so much more than the 'little people.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. The FDIC is one of the great New Deal legacies
Edited on Tue Jul-15-08 10:08 PM by ZombyWoof
Since it's so rarely needed (and known mostly by those ubiquitous stickers in the bank window), it is taken for granted. I would rank it up there with Social Security as one of FDR's enduring accomplishments. The insurance pool wasn't his preferred method, but the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 - which birthed the FDIC - was a compromise he was willing to take if it restored some semblance of confidence in the banking system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. Not to mention
that the FDIC is the organization that monitors and audits banks to ensure that sound business practices are followed. The FDIC, through regular 18 month reviews, has kept banks in check, prevented them from making stupid decisions, and protected the American people. A good regulatory infrastructure is crucial for ANY well functioning democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC