Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Praise of Barney Frank's Flip on the Iran Blockade Resolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:57 AM
Original message
In Praise of Barney Frank's Flip on the Iran Blockade Resolution
In Praise of Barney Frank's Flip on the Iran Blockade Resolution

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/in-praise-of-barney-frank_b_111674.html

Posted July 9, 2008 | 12:57 PM (EST)

Robert Naiman

snip-->

If a politician had a bad position, and they've changed that to a good position as a result of public pressure, that's
a good thing, and we should sing their praises, in the hope that they will be joined by others. Come on over to our side. You'll be much happier over here.


As Keynes said: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"

Let us therefore praise Representative Barney Frank, Democrat of Massachusetts.

Frank is one of more than 200 Members of the House of Representatives who have co-sponsored a resolution (HConRes 362) heavily promoted by AIPAC that effectively calls for a blockade of Iran, an act of war.

But when peace activists complained, he did something that, to my knowledge (and I eagerly look forward to being corrected), none of those other Members of Congress have done.

He publicly admitted that he was wrong.

Last week, Frank told the Northampton Massachusetts Valley Advocate:


"I'm all for stricter sanctions against Iran, but the blockade part goes too far...

I'm going to call the sponsors and tell them I'm changing my vote."


In a letter to an activist from Peace Action, Frank wrote:

"I thank you for contacting me about language in the resolution regarding Iran that calls for a blockade of its naval activity. I agree that this should not be our policy, and I regret the fact that I did not read this resolution more carefully. I'm going to consult with the authors to see if a change can be made that would omit this language, and if they are unwilling to do that, I will make very clear my disagreement with this in the most appropriate form. I am grateful to those who called this to my attention. I apologize again for not having read this more carefully.

I do support sanctions against Iran and I disagree with those who think that sanctions are inappropriate. I believe that sanctions appropriately done can have an impact on the behavior of countries whose behavior ought to be changed. The fact that our European allies, and even Russia and China, have agreed with us on the sanctions I think is a testimony to the legitimacy of this approach. But I repeat that I do think we should have a very clear distinction between sanctions and military action or the threat of it, and the blockade clearly falls on the wrong side of that line, so I will be making clear my opposition to that.


This country urgently needs more Members of Congress like Barney Frank, who are willing to state forthrightly that they made a mistake. http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/involved/hconres362.html">You can ask your Representative to stand with Barney Frank here.

UPDATE: Rep. Robert Wexler also says the Iran resolution must change, in a Huffington Post blog http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-robert-wexler/iran-resolution-must-chan_b_111663.html">here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good for him.
Glad to have him as a part of my community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. He's my Rep , as well. He does me proud!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Mine too
I spoke with him recently at the state convention. He is always a pleasure to speak with and always has an open mind when you speak with him.

Glad he listened and thought about this. Let's hope he can get others to follow him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. And he always replies to his e-mails with detailed explainations,
which I appreciate very much. He was very kind to me a few years ago on a dire matter.
I guess the word I'm looking for is that he is conscientious and respectful. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curious one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. We need more of Barney Frank and Robert wexler in Congress.
True Americans thinking of the good of the country. Thank you both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good for him!
I will write or call and thank him, even though he's not my representative.

Doing something that's right, regardless of how it looks is to be acknowledged.

I was wondering why there were so many Dems falling in line on this one. Learning it's heavily promoted by AIPAC explains a lot. I didn't realize they had that much power -- to influence people into essentially signing up for an act of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. And as Frank said, 'he hadn't read it completely'... I suspect that happens a lot.
Edited on Fri Jul-11-08 02:12 AM by Breeze54
:(

That's why phone calls and e-mails are soooo important!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes! Somebody was mentioning that yesterday
(was it on Air America?) that there's a movie that shows the representatives themselves rely on input from their aides on how they should vote.

That's alarming. They literally don't know all they're voting on at times -- like Frank's statement demonstrates.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. David Cay Johnston makes that same point in his book "Perfectly Legal"
Edited on Fri Jul-11-08 01:21 PM by PA Democrat
regarding US tax code. Most legislators have never read the changes to the tax code before they vote on them. Even worse, a lot of the legislation is actually written by lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. "a lot of the legislation is actually written by lobbyists." -- ACK!!
No wonder we're all in such a mess!! I knew they had a hand in the Big Pharma
and Energy bills but to think they write most of it is pretty alarming!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Why do our representatives stand for that?
Immediately I answered my own question. Money. It's always money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. they don't read those bills especially when 70 dems voted
for telecom immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Conyers said they don't read them in Moore's Farenheit 911 movie, remember that?
:hi: Alyce!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. hey breeze54!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great! Stop the Iran War Resolution...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks for the link!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. good for him. To support such a resolution is flat out irresponsible and dangerous
" I think of war with Iran as the ending of America's present role in the world. Iraq may have been a preview of that, but it's still redeemable if we get out fast. In a war with Iran, we'll get dragged down for 20 or 30 years. The world will condemn us. We will lose our position in the world."

Zbigniew Brzezinski, Vanity Fair, 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thom Hartmann said it was essentially an 'act of war'....
I'm pretty sure that it would start one!! Not a good idea!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. HR362 must be withdrawn
call Congressman Gary Ackerman (202-225-2601) and urge him to withdraw HR 362 and promote diplomacy not war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. AIPAC's role in constructing the resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Thanks Joe.
I heard an interview last night on AAR on the 'Jon Elliot Show' and his replacement host had 2 guests saying the same thing.
One was a Professor from Iran and the other a specialist on Iran and Israel and a few other things. It was quite eye opening.
They talked a lot about the missles being fired after the "threats" from Bush et all and about the proposed blockade.

If you can podcast AAR shows, you should have a listen to it. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC