Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

35 Vermont Towns Vote To Impeach (more may report in Wednesday)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 03:40 AM
Original message
35 Vermont Towns Vote To Impeach (more may report in Wednesday)
http://www.vermontguardian.com/local/032007/TownMeetingImpeach.shtml

Vermont: 34 towns call for impeachment probe of president
By Shay Totten & Christian Avard| Vermont Guardian

Posted March 6, 2007

Voters in more than 30 towns want Congress to begin an impeachment probe of Pres. George W. Bush and Vice Pres. Dick Cheney.

Two towns, Clarendon and Dover, voted the measure down. Nearly a half dozen towns agreed to not take up, or table, the resolution. There are 251 towns in Vermont, but not all hold town meetings. More than a dozen towns passed measures calling for the immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq, and to care for them when they were back on U.S. soil. Dover also rejected the troop measure.

The votes come after a whirlwind, four-day tour of Vermont with antiwar icon Cindy Sheehan and three Vermont Iraq War veterans, along with organizers of the resolutions. Sheehan testified before a state Senate committee on Friday, along with war supporters.

“I’m happy with it. I think we’ve got a very good number of towns that have reported so far and passing it, and it’s pretty overwhelming that didn’t pass. And, just one that voted it down,” said Jimmy Leas, a South Burlington lawyer who crafted the troop withdrawal resolution.

MORE AT LINK

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/3/6/223157/8591

Thirty-Five Vermont Towns Vote to Impeach
by Kagro X
Tue Mar 06, 2007 at 09:00:05 PM PST
In that charming democratic tradition that still lives in New England, today was the day the people of Vermont got to speak. And to govern.

- snip -

Today, news reaches us that thirty-five towns in Vermont said they'd had enough of waiting for someone to probe the depths of George W. Bush's crimes, and would wait no longer.

On the day that Scooter Libby, Special Assistant to the President (let's not forget that he held that title), was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice, and on the day that U.S. Attorneys from all over the country revealed that they had been pressured by Republican operatives and elected officials to drop cases against friends and bring cases against enemies, and on the day that the New Mexico State Senate cleared an impeachment resolution for floor consideration, we've received word that thirty-five the Vermont towns have voted to call for impeachment. (Note: the article lists 33, but reports are that Burke and Newbury have joined the ranks, and more are expected to report in tomorrow.)

The impeachment resolutions have passed so far in Bristol, Calais, Craftsbury, Dummerston, East Montpelier, Greensboro, Guilford, Grafton, Hartland, Jamaica, Jericho, Johnson, Marlboro, Middlebury, Montgomery, Morristown, Newfane, Peru, Plainfield, Richmond, Rochester, Roxbury, St. Johnsbury, Springfield, Stannard, Sunderland, Townshend, Tunbridge, Vershire, Warren, Westminster, Wilmington, and Woodbury, according to organizers. Organizers based their information on reports from people in each town.

- snip -

Yes, this project was, especially in its infancy, largely fueled by the netroots, and successfully transplanted into the "real world" by these and other dedicated and patriotic Vermonters.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Damnit-that's it-I'm moving to Vermont
ASAP. Smart cookies you've got up there in the Green State!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naboo Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, that's what I thought
who wouldn't want impeachment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hi naboo!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent!
:thumbsup:

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm surprised (and happy) it passed in Grafton.
There was quite a controversy reported in the local paper over the past month about one guy trying to block the motion (the odd back woods Bushbot). Dover doesn't surprise me. It's home to Mt. Snow and many expensive homes - lots of people who think the economy is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you Vermont nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. Tunbridge??? No shit!
I used to live in the next town over - color me shocked! :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick & Rec for sanity from VT! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC