Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Your search criteria return no matched results. Please try again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 04:21 PM
Original message
Your search criteria return no matched results. Please try again
I searched the archives for this article and could not find it anywhere, even in the dreaded dungeon. Not that I think this article should belong there, I think it's a very eloquent analysis of conspiracy and why it gets shouted down whenever it is cited.


The Necessary Embrace of Conspiracy

by Robert Shetterly

Several years ago I gave a talk on Martha’s Vineyard about many of the people whose portraits I’ve painted in the Americans Who Tell the Truth series. I spent some time talking about the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr. When I talk about King, I like to focus on his last year — the period when, defying the advice of many of his advisors in the civil rights movement, he spoke against the Vietnam War, equating racism with imperialism. King felt bound to make the point that the forces of capitalism, materialism, and militarism that were driving segregation were also driving the war, and until we confronted the source of the problem, the abuses would continue. It was April 4, 1967, in Riverside Church in New York, that he made that declaration. A year to the day before his assassination.

It has always confounded me every year when we celebrate Dr. King’s life that no mention is made of that Riverside Church speech in the major media. We are always treated to sound bites of the 1963 I Have a Dream speech. That speech’s oratory is as powerful as it is non-confrontational. Which is why it is re-played for modern audiences. Dr. King was about confrontation. Non-violence and confrontation, each ennobling and making the other effective. In 1967 he said, “… my country is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today.” And he explained how our economic system thrived on exploitation and violence, or, as Emma Goldman put it, “The greatest bulwark of capitalism is militarism.” This was probably the most important speech King ever gave and not playing it when we ostensibly honor him, is tantamount to castrating him morally and intellectually. Just as there is a long history of White America castrating black men, there is an equal legacy of Elite America cutting the most important truths of our social prophets out of the history books. We pay homage to King’s icon, the cardboard cutout, but not to his strongest beliefs and his most cogent analysis of our problems — to what vision called forth his courage. And, if we think that he spoke the truth, to censor that truth is to promote a curious kind of segregation. He is segregated, not for the color of his skin, but for the accuracy of his perception, how close to the bone his words cut. We can’t bear to hear the sound of truth’s knife scraping on hypocrisy’s bone. Only people who actually want to change the system dance to that music or want it to be heard.

Equally important, and part of the same neglect, is the intentional ignoring of the facts of his death. In my talk on Martha’s Vineyard I spoke about William Pepper’s book, An Act of State: The Execution of Martin Luther King, Jr. Pepper had been James Earl Ray’s lawyer. Ray was the man convicted of killing King. But both Pepper and the King family were convinced that Ray was innocent. The King family hired Pepper to represent them in a suit; they asked only $100.00 in damages to clear Ray’s name. Before the trial came to court in 1999, Ray had died in prison. The jury determined that King had been assassinated by a conspiracy involving the Memphis police, the Mafia, the FBI, and the Special Forces of the U.S. Army. Ray, the patsy, had left town before the shot was fired. Pepper had confessions from people involved from each of the organizations named. The verdict was barely mentioned in the U.S. media then and is not mentioned every year on the anniversary of his death. Why?

After my talk on Martha’s Vineyard a man came up to me and said, “I enjoyed your speech and was with you until you started that conspiracy stuff about MLK, Jr.” I said, “That’s not conspiracy. What I told you are facts.” End of conversation.

more...

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/08/31/3521/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Holy cow!
I've been doing a lot of thinking lately about all the conspiracy theories of the past, including MLK's assassination... JFK, RFK... bizarre timing in all. God bless the King family for taking this through to the end... for what it's worth... and I hope more people will pay attention.

I was digging in the archives and found this... I've always felt BushCo had more control over our feelings...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=492144
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks for the link.
I've never heard of The Power of Nightmares before, so I will definitely check that out. The Mujahideen truly is Frankenstein's creature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Think about it for a while...
Who benefits from our fear of the boogie man? Who has been our sole source for information on the terrorists? Seems BushCo has been able to make a lot of changes based on terrorism. This is why it concerns me to hear Obama, and anyone else in our government, use some of the same phrases. The only verification of such things comes from BushCo. I don't know about you, but if BushCo tells me the sky is blue, I'm running to the window to make sure.

I am beginning to think this whole terrorist meme is a massive hoax. I'm not saying MIHOP or LIHOP (we know we must be careful in bandying that talk around) in the 9/11 sense, but in the changes that followed that event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This may be a sloppy analogy, but...
If it's 120 degrees outside and you're standing on the sidewalk with an egg, then you throw the egg up in the air and walk away, you can honestly say to anyone who asks, "No, I didn't make any omelettes today!"

Frankly, I think the US was a little more insidious in crafting their omelette, but I think you get the picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes...
Cheney had someone else toss the egg, had yet another report it in the papers, then went on TV and pointed to the omelette. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick for later, thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC