Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

American culture and politics as a media minstrel show

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:26 PM
Original message
American culture and politics as a media minstrel show
The very structure of American entertainment bears minstrelsy's imprint. The endless barrage of gags and puns appears in the work of the Marx Brothers and David and Jerry Zucker...The stump speech is an important precursor to modern stand-up comedy.

The 1830s American stage, where blackface first rose to prominence, featured similarly comic stereotypes of the clever Yankee and the larger-than-life Frontiersman; the late 19th- and early 20th-century American and British stage where it last prospered featured many other, mostly ethnically-based, comic stereotypes: conniving, venal Jews; drunken brawling Irishmen with blarney at the ready; oily Italians; stodgy Germans; and gullible rural rubes.

Stereotyped blackface characters developed: buffoonish, lazy, superstitious, cowardly, and lascivious characters, who stole, lied pathologically, and mangled the English language. Early blackface minstrels were all male, so cross-dressing white men also played black women who were often portrayed either as unappealingly and grotesquely mannish; in the matronly, mammy mold; or highly sexually provocative.

Most minstrels projected a greatly romanticized and exaggerated image of black life with cheerful, simple slaves always ready to sing and dance and to please their masters.

Stereotypes embodied in the stock characters of blackface minstrelsy played a significant role in cementing and proliferating racist images, attitudes and perceptions worldwide...However, unlike vehemently anti-black propaganda from the time, minstrelsy made this attitude palatable to a wide audience by couching it in the guise of well intentioned paternalism. Blacks were in turn expected to uphold these stereotypes or else risk white retaliation. Popular entertainment perpetuated the racist stereotype of the uneducated, ever-cheerful, and highly musical black well into the 1950s.

- Snips from Wikipedia articles on Minstrel Show and Blackface


I put it to you that the media stereotype of typical Americans today is as demeaning and disempowering to them as the minstrel show's depiction of blacks was to the Jim Crow era Negroes. The audience for the media's minstrel show is made up of the corporate elites, laughing up their sleeves in their gated communities at the ignorance and gullibility of the masses, as the media conglomerates ratchet the American stereotype to ever greater depths of bellicose stupidity. And, just as minstrelsy made racism seem humorous, today's media lineup makes the plight of the American middle class seem simultaneously no big deal and vaguely self-inlficted. It also makes "uppity", "shrill" progressives easy to cull from the pack and stigmatize.

This generation of young adults are the first generation to be born and raised in a post-Fairness Doctrine media era, where politics was just another commodity to be advertised, caveat emptor style. They are also the first generation to spend huge amounts of their childhoods immersed in violent video games, which retired Army generals have campaigned against as "training in insensitivity and murder". They are the second generation of latchkey children, left to fend for themselves by the need for both parents' income. Of course, they are not the first generation to be subjected to advertising; but today's advertising is not just about products - its about indoctrinating people in corporate culture:

...there it is: the unending drama of consumer unbound and in search of an ever-heightening good time, the inescapable rock 'n' roll soundtrack, dreadlocks and ponytails bounding into Taco Bells, a drunken, swinging-camera epiphany of tennis shoes, outlaw soda pops, and mind-bending dandruff shampoos...Corporate America is not an oppressor but a sponsor of fun, provider of lifestyle accoutrements, facilitator of carnival, our slang-speaking partner in the quest for that ever-more apocalyptic orgasm. The countercultural idea has become the capitalist orthodoxy.

Consumerism is no longer about "conformity" but about "difference"....We consume not to fit in, but to prove, on the surface at least, that we are rock 'n' roll rebels, each one of us as rule-breeaking and hierarchy-defying as our heroes of the 60s, who now pitch cars, shoes, and beer...The anointed cultural opponents of capitalism are now capitalism's ideologues.

- Thomas Frank, "Why Johnny Can't Dissent", in "Commodify Your Dissent" (1997).


Corporate media is a hugely sophisticated, extremely well-funded psychological warfare operation against middle class democracy. Decades-long campaigns have bent the English language in Orwellian fashion, leaving small or local content providers massacred in droves. (Try to find a copy of Mr. Frank's words above in your local bookstore or on TV.) Words, like citizen and employee, have been disappeared. Vague, dis-empowering words like "consumer" and "associate" have taken their place. With this linguistic framework established, media minstrelsy is hard to disentangle from the manufactured background of everyday language. Jacques Ellul calls this technique "deep sociological propaganda".

Television, movies, and first-person shooter games are god-awful crap. But if you are poor and overworked and tired, TV is the only free entertainment you can get; and video games are about as affordable as alcohol. So you take them into your life. And when you take them, you invite all the media minstrelsy stereotypes to colonize your consciousness.

In the world of media minstrelsy, the average American likes to party and hates to think. He loves his family and his god; and he distrusts teachers and scientists. He wants to buy a lot of cool stuff on credit. He wants to eat all kinds of fatty, unhealthy food. He supports anything the police and the military do, because he is "patriotic" and "law-abiding". He is "tough" and "practical" , "entreprenuerial" and "optimistic" - never chronically ill, a Jeffersonian democrat, unemployable, or "bitter".

When these cultural stereotypes are translated into politics by professional pollsters, advertising agencies, and spin doctors, the average voter shows up as: anti-intellectual (codeword: anti-elitist), anti-tax (if they didn't take "my" money, I could party-hearty), family-valuing (you should pay to school the five children I couldn't afford to have), self-centered suburban louts(why is gas so expensive?).

Yeah, there are a few angry middle class folks, but the stereotype is a club to beat them with:

Blacks were in turn expected to uphold these stereotypes or else risk white retaliation.

People get fired from their jobs for the wrong bumpersticker. People get ostracized from their churches for the wrong political position. People get thrown in jail for demanding that the police respect their civil rights. (And all of that goes onto their employment record as a big black mark.) Authoritarian crackpots like James Dobson can make or break politicians.

Resistance is out there, just as blacks resisted the blackface stereotypes:

In the early days of African-American involvement in theatrical performance, blacks could not perform without blackface makeup, regardless of how dark-skinned they were.

Despite reinforcing racist stereotypes, blackface minstrelsy was a practical and often relatively lucrative livelihood when compared to the menial labor to which most blacks were relegated.

Black performers used blackface performance to satirize white behavior.

- Wikipedia

Shows, like the extremely popular "My Name is Earl", openly implode the minstrelsy stereotypes into caricature, even as they introduce subversive themes like karma, and portray life in an American small town with Dickensian overkill.

Edgy performers, like Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, have been referred to as "court jesters". I think of them more as satirists of corporate minstrelsy. They give the finger to the ideas that Americans are loyal to corporations and the sellout politicians they own, that they cheerfully work for their own enslavement, and that they always say: "thank you sir, please hit me again".

Well, that's my lame attempt at channeling George Lakoff. Thanks to "The Magistrate" for introducing me to the word "minstrelsy".

arendt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. so Tim Russert was Mr. Interlocutor?
Maybe so. Interesting insights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Perhaps. I had to go back to Wikipedia to figure out your ref. Thanks for the fact.
For those interested, here's the ref:

During the first, the entire troupe danced onto stage singing a popular song and doing a dance called the walkaround. Upon the instruction of the interlocutor, a sort of host, they sat in a semicircle. Various stock characters always took the same positions: the genteel interlocutor in the middle, flanked by Tambo and Bones, who served as the endmen or cornermen. The interlocutor and the endmen exchanged jokes and performed a variety of humorous songs. Over time, these came to include maudlin numbers not always in dialect. One minstrel, usually a tenor, came to specialize in this part; such singers often became celebrities, especially with women. An upbeat plantation song and dance ended the act.

- Wikipedia

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Good call; he certainly wasn't Mr Bones...yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another excellent post, Arendt. How our Media portrays us is an
issue that gets little attention. The commercials that sneer at us, parody our lives and thoughts are ever with us. The demise of the "Fairness Doctrine" and the Cables and Networks disbanding their "Standards and Practices Deparments" under Reagan opened the way for us to all be minstrelsies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Edwards Bernays and Noam Chomsky
Watch an excellent Beeb documentary called The Century of the Self.

Edward Bernays (Freud's nephew) took the ideas of Freud (unconscious fears and desires, such as desire for sex and fear of death and fear of unpopularity) and created the Public Relations industry, which connected heavily with advertising.

Buy this car and you will be sexy and popular, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Amen to both those names. You can add Jacques Ellul to the list, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Another kick for those who have made us "Minstrel Parodies." What they do...and make millions at it
Edited on Sun Jun-29-08 08:46 PM by KoKo01
Cannot K&R this enough about how we've been "Manipulated and Had!" Drug Companies, I-Phone...I-Pod...GET IT ALL NOW just get "Master Card and you can LIVE IT ALL!"

At what COST ..to our Democracy? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Its an "intellectual" issue. You either get called an elitist, a CTer, or a commie for trying...
to raise people's consciousness on the subject.

That's why I say the elites "laugh up their sleeves at us".

The same way that the neocon gang laughs at all the fundamentalist suckers who come to the WH to be stroked.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Ain't that the truth...and people who are just looking to uphold our Constitution are now callled
what you say and put into a "box" to be thrown out in the trash.

Oh ...where ohhhh where did all those Repugs go who were carrying on about the Constitution and "rule of law" and "states rights" that used to all call into C-Span's "Washington Journal" all crying out for JUSTICE during Clinton ...but somehow went "silent" under Bush II.

You gotta wonder the extent of the "vast RW Propaganda Machine" when they could tap into all our tax dollars while they denied us Health Insurance, Jobs and Minimum Wage and "Right" to organize to fight against it. It's just amazing how they "spin...spin...spin" and that people BELIEVE IT ALL...because they "trust the media they pay for."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. and it should be THE issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. You are on fire, sir.
Another excellent essay on America... and the homicide of Democracy and the Republic.


Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm not ready to give up on the 20-somethings
Granted, my perceptions may be skewed by interacting with my own kids.

However, a few months after 9/11, I said to my younger son -- who was 19 at the time -- "The news media are claiming this was the defining event of your generation."

"Oh, no," he replied. "My generation already had its defining event. It was Columbine."

Columbine has been pretty much forgotten over the last 7 years -- along with all that other angsty, Welcome to the Hellmouth, 90's stuff. But it left a deep, subversive mindset in my son -- and, I would guess, also in others of his generation.

Yesterday, he IM'd me a link to a YouTube about someone who has invented a device that will project words onto a sign or wall during just the split second that someone else photographs it -- leaving them with a mysterious message in their picture that they *know* wasn't really there. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6RC6pSHijY)

I watched it, then asked him, "In the future, will most of the inhabitants of this planet be spending their free time trying to find new and more elaborate ways to fake each other out?"

"One can only hope so," he responded cheerfully.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The only 20-somethings I deal with are very bright- tech post docs, grad students, etc.
Their politics? They go to FARC, they talk about sports, food, movies, and music. They are aware of politics, but in a David Brooks-y kind of way. They aren't worried by the current situation. They feel that they are golden. That the world will hire them for their brilliance.

This techie set seems to have been thoroughly bubblized by technology - websites, ipods, cell phones, video games. Of course, to get into a top-flight grad school these days, you have to have been born into a solid, middle class family that gave you lessons, tutoring, and the best schools. (The Asians are different; they are still hard working, serious folks.)

I'm not writing the whole generation off. But, the upper (but non-elite) end of techies that I see are the most a-political bunch of young people I have ever experienced. They think politics is either boring or that politicians are nothing beyond fodder for TV comedy. They think Obama is a liberal.

I would love to hear that there are young people to whom the ideals of the Constitution are alive and meaningful; but I can believe what you said, that all they do is try to prank/practical joke/Rick roll and otherwise make light of everything serious in life.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'll introduce you to something else.
Ota Benga.

It's a valuable bit of American history to know for people who like to draw parallels.

Ota Benga was an African pygmy who was put on display at the St. Louis World's Fair in 1904, and then displayed at the Bronx Zoo in 1906. He, a human, was put in a monkey cage on display for the amazement of whites. His teeth were filed to make him look more dangerous, and he was erroneously called a cannibal. He cavorted with orangutans.

Then he was released to the black clergy of New York. They capped his teeth, educated him, and pressured him to convert to Christianity. He was unable to return to his tribe in Africa.

He ended up in Virginia in a low-paying job, and eventually killed himself after breaking the caps off his teeth.

There's a biography. And you can find info on google, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. There was a similar story about an Eskimo from Greenland on PBS a few months ago...
he was picked up by an Arctic expedition, along with his parents. The parents soon sickened and died. The Eskimo child was adopted by Louis Aggasiz or some early psychologist (I forget which). He was sent to college, but eventually became disillusioned.

Anyway, the Eskimo fit in nowhere. Went back to Greenland, but was too alien. Came back to the U.S. and worked in lumber camps up North and in Canada. Died a forgotten non-entity.

In the early 20th century, the West played God with the rest of the world. In the 19th century, they played God with the black race (and the Chinese and the American Indians). We have got soooooo much karma; and when it comes due, we are going to be toast.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. One last kick. No comments all day. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. missing the forest for the trees

Again and again you have done good work displaying how the bastards are beating us down, yet somehow you cannot connect the final dots, the ones that connect the abusive media, treacherous politicians, the police state, imperialism, poverty and environmental degradation to our capitalist economic system.

Does it not make sense to kill all of those birds with one stone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. It is implicit in everything I say...
but saying it explicitly is like being the first one to make a Hitler comparison - it just ruins your credibility (no matter how true it is).

The only line of attack that will not be COMPLETELY shut down is that these people are criminals, thieves, and murderers. The fact that THE SYSTEM has green-lighted them cannot be mentioned; because the system is to be preserved.

Still at this moment, the system has the power to smash opposition; to put it in camps; to disappear it. The time to go all out is after the system is in wreckage. If Sy Hersh's Iran rumors are true, that time is less than four months away.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. I wonder, Arendt, if there are more than a "handful" who even know what a "Minstrel Show" was....
Our history is so dumbed down and most today just know Internet...and history from Wiki when they need to write something. It isn't "of their time" so the impact just doesn't register...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Point taken, but that's why I gave the links to Wikipedia...
I mean, its one thing not to know; its a completely different thing not to care.

The same cons get run every generation. Its the job of parents to help their kids not get taken by these cons. I'm just behaving like a parent, except nobody on DU is forced to listen. The problem is that, when they fall for the con, I get hurt along with them.

He who lives to see two or three generations is like a man who sits some time in the conjurer’s booth at a fair, and witnesses the performance twice or thrice in succession. The tricks were meant to be seen only once; and when they are no longer a novelty and cease to deceive, their effect is gone.

- Arthur Schopenhauer, "Studies in Pessimism"


arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Agree....I just wonder if the history has the same impact it did
with many of us who know those movies and that era and the propaganda. I wonder if many here can understand the connection the way some of the rest of us closer to that time can.

Great post...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Tough call. Don't we really want to completely erase minstrelcy? Or do we?
Which is the better way to prevent future relapses? To expunge the history? Or to continue to repeat the slander?

I don't have the answer. Just raising the question.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC