Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

to the RW Nuts.. Fitz couldn't prove the underlying crime because of Libby's obstruction!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 01:52 PM
Original message
to the RW Nuts.. Fitz couldn't prove the underlying crime because of Libby's obstruction!!!!
That DOESN'T MEAN that there was NO CRIME COMMITTED!!!!
Libby's antics prevented the justice department from obtaining the evidence to support their case.

Unfortunately, most people don't seem to get that, so the right win spin machine will probably work to some degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Throwing sand in the face of the umpire"
He said that with his initial statement in announcing the indictments; couldn't see whether the runner was safe or out because of Libby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. exactly. It's the opposite of what they are crowing
if anything, Libby's guilt says there WAS a higher crime, not that there wasn't a crime.

Then again, do we expect them to be able to think rationally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. They "get it", believe me
They just don't want to accept it. Denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Send this to Pat Buchanan n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. It seems to me that nailing Libby for lying should help clear the
way for the real investigation of who ordered the outing of Valerie Plame. Libby is not the only one with information that could incriminate Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Which is why they keep repeating the lying mantra...
but she wasn't covert! :puke:

the other shoe hasn't dropped yet, and the Wilsons aren't finished with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC