Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU Urges Congress to Do the Right Thing for Young Americans; Funding for Abstinence-only Must End

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 03:08 PM
Original message
ACLU Urges Congress to Do the Right Thing for Young Americans; Funding for Abstinence-only Must End
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 24, 2008
2:50 PM

CONTACT: ACLU
Rachel Perrone, (202) 675-2312,
media@dcaclu.org


ACLU Urges Congress to Do the Right Thing for Young Americans;
Funding for Abstinence-only Programs Must End


WASHINGTON - June 24 - The American Civil Liberties Union urges both the Senate and House of Representatives to act in the best interest of young people and eliminate funding for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. It will be a critical week as two of the largest federal funding streams for such programs are slated for consideration. In the Senate, the Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies will mark up the FY09 appropriations bill today and include an allocation for the Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) program; the Senate Appropriations Committee will meet on Thursday, June 26th. In the House, the Appropriations Committee will meet this Wednesday to ratify the subcommittee recommendations, which last week included flat-funding for CBAE.

Meanwhile, earlier today the House passed H.R. 6331, the Medicare Improvement for Patients and Providers Act of 2008, on the suspension calendar. That bill contains a 12-month extension for the Title V abstinence-only program that provides $50 million for states to fund abstinence-only efforts. The Senate tried and failed to pass a similar Medicare bill on June 12th that contained an indefensible 18-month extension of the Title V program, despite the fact that 17 states have declined to take the money, believing that the program is not in the best interest of their youth. The Senate is expected to readdress the issue later this week.

The following can be attributed to Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office:

“There is no question that all programs offering young people education or guidance about human sexuality should urge them to delay sexual activity. However, federally-funded programs focusing exclusively on abstinence are at odds with good public health policy and raise serious civil liberties concerns. Congress should not support programs that censor medically accurate information, reinforce gender stereotypes, provide inaccurate or misleading information, promote religion, serve a narrow ideological agenda, and jeopardize the well-being of young people. But despite the overwhelming evidence that abstinence-only programs don’t work, Congress remains in the grip of proponents of this failed policy and seems unable or unwilling to disengage itself.

“Young people deserve the truth. At some point, everyone is faced with important decisions about their sexuality. We do young people no favors by censoring information and failing to give them all the tools they need to make well-informed decisions. More than anything, we want them to have all the facts, and we want them to be safe.”

Through CBAE, the Department of Health and Human Services distributes grants to community-based organizations that provide abstinence-only education programs in schools in compliance with a strict eight-point definition of abstinence. Title V is a federal and state matching program, under which states contribute three dollars for every four federal dollars, and from that pot of money, distribute grants to organizations to provide an unambiguous abstinence-only message in schools. Programs receiving funds from either source may not endorse, promote, or provide information about contraceptive use, except to emphasize their (often exaggerated) failure rates.
###


http://www.commondreams.org/news2008/0624-25.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. What exactly is the ACLU's "skin in the game" regarding this subject? n/t
Duke

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC