Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gossip columnist escapes indictment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 07:35 AM
Original message
Gossip columnist escapes indictment
Get me rewrite

By HARVEY SILVERGLATE
March 5, 2007 4:35:24 PM

What a surprise. The much trumpeted federal investigation into allegations that a former New York Post gossip writer tried to extort a friend of former President Bill Clinton has been quietly dropped.

Score one for the little guy. “Freedom Watch” recently received an e-mail from Jared Paul Stern, the now infamous New York Post gossip reporter at the center of the so-called “Page Six scandal,” informing us that “the feds finally admitted they have no case.” Clearly breathing sigh of relief, Stern concluded that he “just wanted to thank <“Freedom Watch”> for being the first to point that out.”

The Phoenix, it turned out, was closer to the mark than were the breathless headlines in the New York Times , which broke its page-one, above-the-fold story that Stern supposedly extorted billionaire supermarket mogul Ronald W. Burkle, seeking cash in exchange for favorable coverage. The Times reported the story and quoted allegedly damning surveillance-video tapes provided by Burkle’s security team in such a way that, to casual readers, it seemed as if Stern was not only on his way to indictment for extortion, but that he’d be the taxpayers’ guest at a federal prison before too long.

“Freedom Watch” was skeptical, in part because the Times’s source had turned over “only six heavily edited minutes of roughly three hours of recordings” of Stern in Burkle’s office discussing how Burkle could avoid negative gossip coverage in the Post. In the course of those conversations, Burkle, it seemed, repeatedly tried to trap Stern with legally damning language, only to have each such overture rebuffed by circumspect responses.

More:
http://www.thephoenix.com/article_ektid34880.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. sounded like a set-up from the beginning
hope this guy sues the hell out of everybody. This was intimidation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC