Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McClatchy should get some love since they're the only major print outlet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 02:11 PM
Original message
McClatchy should get some love since they're the only major print outlet
that produces real news anymore. We should be sending them flowers, imo.

Go post a comment to their site if you can. The registration is very quick.

CIA advised military on questioning at Guantanamo

By Warren P. Strobel | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — The CIA, which had authority to use harsh interrogation techniques on suspected terrorist detainees, advised U.S. military officials at Guantanamo in 2002 on how far they could go in extracting information from captives there, documents released at a Senate hearing Tuesday show.

"If the detainee dies you're doing it wrong," Jonathan Fredman, chief counsel to the CIA's Counterterrorism Center, told a meeting of officials on Oct. 2, 2002, according to minutes from the meeting.

That meeting came a week after a delegation of senior Bush administration officials visited the Guantanamo Naval base, where the Bush administration has set up a prison camp for suspected terrorists. In addition to Fredman, attendees at the meeting included Lt. Col. Jerald Phifer, who was in charge of Guantanamo's Joint Task Force 170, and Lt. Col. Diane Beaver, who was Task Force 170's legal officer.

The officials who had visited Guantanamo the week before were David Addington, counsel to Vice President Dick Cheney; William Haynes, the Pentagon’s top lawyer; acting CIA counsel John Rizzo; and Michael Chertoff, head of the Justice Department's Criminal Division, and now President Bush's Homeland Security secretary.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/41329.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought I heard just yesterday that McClatchy is laying off 10%
Edited on Tue Jun-17-08 02:16 PM by Wickerman
of it's staff?

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003817340
Behind McClatchy Layoffs -- A Mountain Of Debt

By Mark Fitzgerald

Published: June 17, 2008 12:30 PM ET

CHICAGO The 1,400 McClatchy Co. employees targeted for layoffs can blame their job loss on the faltering newspaper economy in general, their company's specific concentration of papers in California and Florida where the housing collapse has been most acute -- and a forward-looking strategy once hailed as a way to avoid precisely this kind of pain.

When McClatchy borrowed heavily to buy Knight Ridder Inc. in 2006, it was following a strategy that Wall Street and other industry observers said made perfect sense for newspaper chains: grow top-line revenue through acquisitions funded by cheap credit. McClatchy added its own spin -- again to favorable reviews -- by quickly reducing much of the debt with the sales of a dozen dailies that didn't fit its company profile of serving "fast-growing" markets.

But, as the June E&P cover story -- titled "Til Debt Do Us Part" -- makes clear, everything went wrong for McClatchy after the applause faded.

The housing crunch depressed revenues, especially at such newly acquired properties as The Miami Herald and The Sacramento Bee. More than one-third of its total advertising revenue comes from papers in Florida and California.
--more--

Sad, when they were indeed (at times) doing good reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's not surprising. I don't know how they stay in business at all.
That McClatchy bought the Miami Herald ("We'll print ANYTHING!") is good news though.

The print media is struggling to find a new model that works. And, they're not there yet. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC