Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two men choose Navy as sentence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:09 PM
Original message
Two men choose Navy as sentence
More fodder for Bushco. Yeah, you guessed it...Lunsford is Republican

BELLEFONTE, Pa. - Two 19-year-olds facing probation and community service or even jail time in the shooting of a steer considered a family pet took advantage of another option offered by the judge - joining the Navy.

Chris Jabco and Eric Smith, both from Bellefonte, had pleaded guilty to criminal conspiracy to commit cruelty to animals and two summary violations in the shooting of the $3,500 Scottish Highland steer.

The two were drinking Sept. 17 and drove through Spring Township with another man in search of deer to poach, culminating in the shooting of the steer, authorities said. The pair reached a deal with prosecutors, who recommended two years' probation and at least five hours of community service.

But Centre County Court Judge Bradley P. Lunsford said the case warranted more than probation. He noted the pain caused to the animal's owner and said Jabco and Smith had been drinking and driving around looking for something to kill. Their actions, he said, "were premeditated, senseless, and your motivations were evil..."

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/16830976.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just like during Vietnam (late 60s-early 70s), it's JAIL or the MILITARY. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. It was even better then.
I was drafted in 1969. The guy who bunked above me in basic training had killed someone and had copped a plea for manslaughter. Drug deal gone wrong, I think. Then he joined the Army to keep from going to prison. If memory serves he had to enlist for 5 years instead of the 3 year minimum or the 2 year active duty requirement for draftees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. OMG, that's a little different than my brother
My brother is 13 years older than me and trouble with the City Police caused him to agree to joining the 101st Airborne around 68' ... but he was just doing stupid stuff like smoking dope (don't know for sure) but he didn't kill anyone. :wow:

I remember helping mom pack his favorite snack "Fiddle Faddle" to send over to Vietnam.

Yes, I heard that, in addition to the draft, a significant number of young men opted to go into the army rather than jail.

It goes without saying that you took care not to piss him off lest he might "get weird." ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. I got lucky. Didn't get sent to 'Nam
Edited on Mon Mar-05-07 02:54 PM by Lasher
I'm just a subvet with no combat experience. They sent me to Seoul.

But I can relate to those 'care packages'. My mother and Mrs. Lasher were good to send them and it was just like Christmas to get them. Things you couldn't get over there, like anchovies, yum. They made sure to send plenty so I could share with the other lost souls.

Peace, it's still a good idea. :hippie:

Edit: Some things of the past are better off left unsaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yes, most combat vets wouldn't wish war on their worst enemy.
Sure, it matures you ... that thousand yard stare and a feeling when you get back to the states that you just don't fit in because you're hypersensitive to every sound.

You're correct, many things are better left unsaid but the scars of war remain deep within everyone who has experienced it. No one escapes combat without being changed emotionally ... deep down and not always in a good and maturity driven way.

Yes, war is insanity. I'm glad I served my four years during peacetime because as I age I've become much more liberal and see only war as a very last resort.

Best regards, SnF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Thank you for the candor, SnF.
I've seen you around and like what you have to say.

When our soldiers return home let's don't ever allow ourselves to resent them on account of the failed war they have been sent into. They would be able to tell.

Your friend,

Lasher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsmesgd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. forget the navy, put them on the front, and put the poor people there as well
SARCASM
Is this the next recuitment drive for the military?
Overcrowding in prison + a need for troops = a good fit??

First the criminals, then the poor, then the minorities. Problem solved two birds with one stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. And we wonder why military readiness is shit.
The service will feel no benefit from having these two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taoschick Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. The military
Is under no obligation to accept them into service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is This The Type Of Person We Want
in the military? Men (or women) who already demonstrate a propensity for cruelty? And when they get over there and commit crimes against civilians, what then? We can jail these boys then, but the damage (to the victims) and the reputation of our armed forces will be done.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Not exactly. But we don't want repubes either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
purduejake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now they can look for things to hunt and kill overseas....
Edited on Mon Mar-05-07 01:19 PM by purduejake
Two people who recreationally kill are now joining our military. Is it really surprising to see torture and murder committed by our troops when we find people like this and send them over? It's a disgrace to the large majority of troops who are honorable and should be proud of their service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. " ... drinking and driving around looking for something to kill..."
Send 'em to Baghdad and lets see how long they last when their fodder can shoot back at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Exporting Evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Cool - Cuba gave us their criminals. Might as well send ours to Iraq.
Edited on Mon Mar-05-07 01:27 PM by Rabrrrrrr
My uncle served in Vietnam under the "jail or military" option. Thankfully, he lived through it, though not without a lot of suffering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Shape of Things to Come...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sending a kid into the military to fix being a drunk is stupid.
I am NOT claiming all soldiers are drunks, but clearly alcoholics have no problem finding drinking buddies in the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. was watching the new reality show Juvies when the Judge

told two teenage sisters who had been fighting other girls, that if they liked to fight they could join the military.

I thought - what a for crap thing to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. so they were given the death penalty? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. they chose the military over probation and FIVE HOURS of community service
It sounds like it is their decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. The judge rejected that deal:
"The judge said they could spend 48 hours in jail, two years on probation, and 100 hours caring for animals on a farm; avoid jail time but spend 200 hours on the farm and remain on probation for two years; or enlist in the military."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. heck 48 hours in jail, two years probation and 100 hours of caring for animals on a farm
is still a pretty soft deal for what they did. But they decided to choose the military--kind of dumb to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. They shouldn't have had the option. It should have been jail, no questions asked
Drinking and Driving, and they decide to go out shooting?

I know a lot of gun nuts here will take issue with this, but these people should be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. "I know a lot of gun nuts here will take issue with this..."
Could you please point to *anyone* on this site that would disagree with these morons going to jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. I would have picked the Air Force
They only shoot at the officers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
26. I have a problem with this
If I am in the fight for my life, I want honorable soldiers next to me...not punk kids who get their kicks shooting animals.
They are cowards.
The other thing that stinks, why the navy? Why not the army or marines?
What is striking is that poaching is highly illegal. They claimed that is what they were doing. The fact that they shot a domestic animal who isn't subject to poaching laws is a travesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC