Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Asia Times - Petraeus and Cheney agree on attacking Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 09:56 AM
Original message
Asia Times - Petraeus and Cheney agree on attacking Iran
Edited on Mon Jun-09-08 09:57 AM by OregonBlue
Pentagon blocked Cheney's attack on Iran
By Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON - Pentagon officials firmly opposed a proposal by Vice President Dick Cheney last summer for airstrikes against the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) bases by insisting that the administration would have to make clear decisions about how far the United States would go in escalating the conflict with Iran, according to a former George W Bush administration official.

After he become head of the Central Command (Centcom) in March 2007, Admiral William Fallon also made his opposition to such a massive attack on Iran known to the White House, according Middle East specialist Hillary Mann, who had developed close working relationships with Pentagon officials when she worked on the National Security Council staff.

Petraeus was also a supporter of Cheney's proposal for striking IRGC targets in Iran, going so far as to hint in an interview with Fox News last September that he had passed on to the White House his desire to do something about alleged Iranian assistance to Shi'ites that would require US forces beyond his control.

At that point, Fallon was in a position to deter any effort to go around DoD and military opposition to such a strike because he controlled all military access to the region as a whole. But Fallon's forced resignation in March and the subsequent promotion of Petraeus to become Centcom chief later this year gives Cheney a possible option to ignore the position of his opponents in Washington once more in the final months of the administration.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JF10Ak01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. bomb bomb bomb
obliterate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Asia Times is making US Media look like Bozos
Cheney is definitely a mad man
Petraeus isn't thinking of Americans when he is doing this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Q is "How Far Will Cheney Go When Iranians Retaliate for Such An Attack?" Hmmmm....
... I'd say Cheney would escalate the conflict.

Deferment Specialist First Class Cheney would have no qualms about ordering the attack IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. See my comment (#6) at
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3410938

I think we're going to see the opening of a new front in the Oil Wars, in South America, instead. (Iran is too problematic.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. This is always in the back of my mind...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3410938#3411034

"...I think the blow is going to come in South America--in the form of U.S. military "support" for secessionist movements (organized, funded, armed by the Bushites) in the oil-rich provinces of Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. They gotta bomb someone. How else do they propose to stay in power? These are
very dangerous men and these are very dangerous times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Bomb or help overthrow, either way we need to protect
our interests :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I love it "PROTECT" our interests!! LOL
:mad: They are batshit crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC