Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Surgical or medical removal of ectopic pregnancies could also not be performed under this law."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 04:17 PM
Original message
"Surgical or medical removal of ectopic pregnancies could also not be performed under this law."
I'm flabbergasted.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/06/08/9481/

snip//

Because 2008 is an election year, so-called National Right to Life and other anti-choice organizations are also focusing on state ballot initiatives to whittle away or wipe out completely women’s right to choose.

The Colorado Secretary of State’s office announced on May 29 that a random sampling of petitions indicated enough valid signatures to put “the Colorado Equal Rights Amendment” on the state’s November ballot. This law, with the outrageously misleading title, would change the state constitution to confer “personhood” and equal rights to fertilized eggs.

The law would criminalize all abortions immediately, including those to save a woman from death or permanent injury. Birth control methods such as emergency contraception, like the “morning-after pill,” intrauterine devices and some oral contraceptives, would become illegal.

Surgical or medical removal of ectopic pregnancies could also not be performed under this law. In ectopic pregnancies, an embryo imbeds in an organ other than the uterus, usually the fallopian tubes. According to a Mayo Clinic study, one in every 40 to 100 pregnancies is ectopic, and no ectopic pregnancies can result in a birth. If the embryo continues to grow, the tubes will eventually rupture and may cause massive hemorrhage, creating a life-threatening situation for the pregnant woman.

more...

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/06/08/9481/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Spare the embryo and waste the mothers life
which means the embryo dies anyway. Now there's some stinkin' thinkin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. To the far Right a woman's life is worthless
she only exists to serve men and create more men. They probably think "well, she's failing as a mother, so she may as well die". Not much difference between them and the Taliban!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Folks need not bother telling me it isn't about controlling women
"Good" women die because they didn't abort and "bad" women die because they do abort. ("God's will" and all that crap)

Isn't that how it goes for the pieces of shit who call themselves "pro-life"

Women die. Period. And either way, those POS feel justified.

Fuck.Them.All.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I really hate pro-life people
They would prefer someone die from an ectopic pregnancy than remove it. Unreal. That embryo is never going to be viable anyway, so why the hell should they not be able to remove it. Fucking inhuman pieces of shit. Fundamentalist Bible-thumper assholes trying to stuff their belief down everyone's throats. They need to die painfully. Sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. It's not pro-life. It's anti-woman
Pure and simple. They regard female sexuality as the greatest crime ever to be faced by humanity. The woman who gets pregnant is being punished for her sinful licentiousness by god. That's what these people's position amounts to - that a pregnancy is a punishment for sin. And it's only sin for the woman, of course. They might frown on men who sow their oats all over hte place, but you'll never see a pro-life organization advocating paternal responsibility and liability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Yes, we just told them this country isn't interested in respecting women.
We told them for months and months and months on every channel, in the newspapers, and on the internet. Why wouldn't they think this is the perfect time for such a law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
43. I'm not following
But I'm really hoping you're not taking the opportunity to spin this travesty of a law into some sort of Primary bickery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. So true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Sure is anti-women...
back to the days when women were to remain silent and had no control over their bodies. They were more property than individual, the religious nuts want to go back to the dark ages. We simply can no allow that to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edith Ann Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. I thought Oklahoma
was the worst state to live in for women and children. It seems Colorado's crazies wants to out do our crazies. I'm tired of Christian Conservatives and their family values. I want people of Faith who value families to be elected. There is a difference. The problem with Christian Conservatives is they have no ethics. They are willing to do what ever harm they deem necessary to get their way. People of faith value everyone's family and seek to make a better life for all families. What ever happened to a woman's right to life. Ec topic pregnancies aren't viable. Why do these people feel it necessary to KILL women. When will people start valuing women for their gift of life instead of passing laws to KILL us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. This isn't "right to life". It's "right to impose MY belief on everyone else".
These people consistently place the rights of the unborn over the rights of the living -- to the ludicrous extent that they would see a woman die of a pregnancy that has no hope of being viable rather than allow the woman to live.

Never mind they don't give a damn what happens to a child once it's born.

It's all about their distorted belief pertaining to a fetus and imposing that belief on everyone else, nothing more or less. It's so twisted it doesn't even qualify as religious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Forcing a woman's organ to needlessly rupture for the sake of controlling her
is a crime against humanity and I will not tolerate it. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I hope to God people pay attention to this before it's too late.
I have several friends who would be dead or infertile if this had been a law when we were in our 20s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. they better start charging men who Wack off needlessly
cause that is killing babies as well



oh thats right...its not women doing it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. What I want to know is where are the men? You know, the ones who could end up as single fathers
when their wives die in childbirth or NINE FUCKING MONTHS before childbirth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edith Ann Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
48. Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They are killing millions of babies at one time. I never thought of that. See how well we are indoctrinated. We need to advertise this on billboards all over the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SergeyDovlatov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. I can't believe it... They cannot be that stupid
Edited on Sun Jun-08-08 04:48 PM by SergeyDovlatov
Probably ectopic pregnancies will be terminated, but then, the doctor will be charged with involuntary manslaughter and case dismissed by a judge.

I can't think anyone in half-clear mind will allow ectopic pregancy to go thru. It is just painful torture to death for all parties involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
39. That's at least voluntary manslaughter.
That's a sin of omission when it was OBVIOUS that the only way to save the patient's life was to remove the ectopic pregnancy, and the doctor refused. That's a clearcut case of negligent, or even intentional, homicide. Good medical practice would insist that the doctor operate to save the patient's life. I'd call that major malpractice on the civil side, as well.


I am a lawyer but I don't play one on TV.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
logosoco Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. I would like for one of these "prolifers" to look me in the eyes and say
this is a good idea. My first pregnancy was ectopic, then I had 2 healthy babies, then I had another ectopic, then another healthy baby. But they think I should have died with the first one. How sickening! And if I would have died, my kids would not be here. This is so stupid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edith Ann Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
50. These people
probably let 3yr olds die from appendicitis because they don't believe in doctors. These people are a small part of the population we need to get them out of government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. It will never pass, even if they have enough signatures
to get it on the ballot. I suppose the knuckle-draggers think that *IF* it passes, they could then make exceptions for things like ectopic pregnancies by statute. After all, even the Roman Catholic Church has always allowed exceptions for ectopic pregnancies, since there is no way the fetus can survive.

But they'd still achieve their REAL purpose of criminalizing birth control in Colorado. Assholes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. That means every time a woman sheds a fertilized ovum
(which might be as many as 60% of them), she will be guilty of involuntary manslaughter.

I suggest all women of Colorado start mailing their used sanitary napkins and tampons to the authors of this bill so they can be examined for evidence of this crime.

Idiots. They never see the fact that there is a real human being involved in this and that she already has rights guaranteed under the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nope, no danger at all in casting a pro-McCain spite vote this year!
It's not as though presidents have anything to do with appointing Supreme Court justices, and it's not as though Supreme Court justices have anything to do with slapping down nonsense like this...


:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Ah. A Hate-the-Mother law.
Hey, Colorado, go for it. Why should you lag behind Kansas and Idaho?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. My mother had an ectopic pregnancy and it almost killed her
She could never have had children after that horrible episode.

That's why I and my sister are adopted.

These idiots should NOT have been given ONE SECOND'S worth of attention before being dismissed.

What the hell is going on in Colorado???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I think that my mother's ruptured or at least came close. I can't imagine not being allowed to
Edited on Sun Jun-08-08 07:58 PM by GreenPartyVoter
receive medical care for something so dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. So they would rather wait until the embryo is older before it dies?
Since an ectopic can't survive, it would just delay the inevitable while putting the mother's life at risk. Besides, I'm pretty sure it would be unconstitutional, not that it will stop them from trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. That law would have killed me in 1987
I was hours from having my fallopian tube burst due to an ectopic pregnancy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
52. I called my friend who was a nurse once when Doug and I were on the road.
I told her what I thought and said I wanted to wait to get home before I went to the doctor. She asked me what kind of flowers I wanted at my funeral.

Good grief, these people are either nuts or sociopaths.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. Short sightedness Based on Emotion often leads to Unnecessary CRAP
Holy Shit...they didn't cover that Base?....Blind SOBs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. Not sure you heard this - a woman did give birth after a full-term ectopic pregnancy last week
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/05/29/2259761.htm

It was ovarian, not fallopian tubes, however.

First time ever, but I wouldn't put it past the woman-hating anti-choicers to point to this one instance as further reason to pass this law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. How the heck did her ovary manage that?
I mean... where'd all the baby fit?

Shudders...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #25
40. Actually I saw a Discovery heatlh program many months ago
Edited on Mon Jun-09-08 02:13 AM by lostnfound
about another such case of a healthy ectopic baby born from the outside of a woman's uterus. I think the woman lives in England. The woman and the baby both survived.
It may have been about this woman:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/4197194.stm

Here was another such case: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/671390.stm
It says one in ten thousand births are ectopic, which seems unbelievably high.

Of course these are irrelevant to the overall concept. It would be absolutely insane to expect a woman to play such Russian Roulette with her life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edith Ann Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #40
53. There are anomalies in the process,
however they are exceptions and probably not ectopic. A tube is very small and won't allow for the growth of the baby before it bursts. There have been cases of eggs being fertilized and growing in the abdominal cavity that have come to term and lived. This happens when the egg is fertilized after the egg is out of the tube but doesn't make it to the uterus. Tubes just are not elastic enough to deal with the growth of the baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. that's seriously absurd
are there people who think this would be a good law? just what i read above i would think would be enough to cause any thinking person to vote against it. my ex DIL nearly died from an ectopic pregnancy; if they hadn't performed emergency surgery, removing both the pregnancy and the fallopian tube, she would have. i recall at the hospital they gave her literature on grieving though. she didn't even know she was pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
27. Even if this passes, which it likely won't
there is no way it would hold up in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edith Ann Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #27
44. Maybe not
but how many would die before it was struck down? Even one is too many. I've asked this before, Why do these men hate women enough to KILL us just because we got pregnant? What kind of EVIL has too exist to do this to women. One person here asked, Where are the men? If your wife is young enough to have a child are you prepared to watch her die for no good reason other than some wingnut wants to pander to his base? If you have other children, are you prepared to care for them on your own? How are you going to explain to your children that their mother had to die, only because some legislator wanted to keep his seat and his power? This is way beyond abortion on demand. This effects all women. Imagine being that women with an ectopic pregnancy. Knowing you could live with and operation and being told the state is going to kill you without due process, so take your pain killers and die. I thought the death penalty was reserved for the most heinous crimes. When did giving life become a heinous crime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. The law cannot go into effect if there is an outstanding legal challenge
At least that seems to be how it went in other states. Fear not. The Colorado Supreme Court is 5-2 Democratic. As for the people pushing this law, I don't like them any more than you, and I'm a guy. There are plenty of us on your side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edith Ann Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Thank you.
I'm glad I've been through menopause. I also have sons. I wouldn't like to see my granddaughter hurt though. Thanks again, I've been in a bad mood all day long. I feel better now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
28. An ectopic pregnancy endagered my wife's life. If not for emergency surgery..
I shudder to think what would have happened.

She had a Kaiser HMO at the time ('92) and they approved treating with Methatrexate (chemo drug). Three days later, she ended up in emergency surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. I came very close to dying back in the 80's.
For about 45 seconds I had the most excruciating pain I have ever felt. After that, it became a dull pain. I was busy with two young children, and thought (stupidly) it might have been gastric distress from the White Castles I had inhaled earlier.

And so, I tried to ignore it. Ate antacids like candy. By the third morning, I was unable to sleep. I stood up and collapsed against the wall. My husband drove me to the hospital around 3 am that Valentine's Day.

I knew something very serious was going on, given how many came running after my initial examination. A nurse was stationed at my bedside, while we waited for the surgeon.

I had been hemorrhaging internally for three days. The baby was not viable they told me. Another six hours, and I would most likely not have survived.

So, if I read this correctly...this group would rather I die from blood loss letting nature take its course, even after the embryo itself was no longer living.

Yeah, that makes perfect sense. It would have left my husband alone to raise two young children.

I can't even begin to understand the ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Mine ruptured in 2002
It was about 45 minutes from when I collapsed to the time I was prepped and ready for emergency surgery. In the mean while I lost about 2 litters of blood - a significant percentage.

All I could think about was that I wanted my husband to take my 3 year old son home so that he wouldn't be in the hospital when he heard that his mom had died. I thought it would make him scared of doctors.

Turns out I lived and gave birth 5 years later to a beautiful little girl, but mostly because, after the rupture itself, everything else went right.

Not an experience I'd wish on anyone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. Lovely. I guess we're just incubators now.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
31. My wife came within a few hours of dying from an ectopic pregnancy
Back in 1985.

This law is a very bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kixel Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
32. Do the Anti Choice people do this on purpose?
Obviously there is no way that this law would ever hold up. It looks like they are doing something to end abortions, yet they know they are not. It adds fuel to the fire, gets them in the news as being anti-choice, but doesn't really change anything. They get to keep the issue, make headlines, and seem "nobel" to idiots who don't think about the issue in shades of grey.

I don't know ANY anti-choice person who thinks that a woman with an etopic pregnancy should die. It seems its just a bunch of smoke and mirrors that no one other than the extremely naive thinks will truly erode abortion rights. I am more worried about bills that slowly erode abortion rights.

By the way-for those of you who have suffered etopic pregnancies, I am sorry for your loss! One of my best friends had one, she lost a tube and her pregnancy. It was really sad for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. I've seen speculation that they do
that they like to keep the issue hot-button - in fact, don't really want to win this fight - just want to keep it going. It raises lots of money and pushes their real agendas, politically speaking.

I'm not sure I buy it, but it's a thought for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. They keep the issue in the forefront to whip up their base and
get them all to go out and vote against the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
38. And what about anacelphalic babies
who have no brain and cannot trigger delivery, we let the mother die a year later of a baby that has died and is rotting in her womb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
41. How could anyone defend this? This is insane.
I'd like to see the rational for this out of morbid curiosity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Blonde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
42. Judging by this
so far isn't this a few whack jobs who wrote up the most draconian anti-abortion law they could think of and then went around getting signatures?

If that is the case I'm sure they left out the more odious sections of their beloved law while getting signatures. Hopefully, a bare minimum of education about this will guarantee it fails miserably in November. It would be nice to think it would have a 100% against rating but that is hoping for far too much. Still except for a few true believers I would think most anti-abortion activists would realize this goes far beyond what they want. I know they are big into two in the bush is better than one in the hand, but this guarantees none in the bush either. Idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
45. It is ludicrous to expect doctors to
not save a life of anyone, it is against their oath. They can try to pass this law but public outcry will strike it down. This wedge issue of contraception, always comes up to demoralize the left and keep us in outrage mode, but it cannot be allowed to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
49. If that law were in effect, I'd be really dead by now.
How many minutes do we have once a tube ruptures?

This is just insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
51. It's like that in El Salvador, and it's HELL ON EARTH. Read:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
54. If anything like this passes, I will no longer have sex
I'll substitute with "toys". See how they like THAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC