Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glenn Greenwald: David Broder: Embodiment of Beltway values

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 04:45 PM
Original message
Glenn Greenwald: David Broder: Embodiment of Beltway values
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/06/07/broder/

Glenn Greenwald
Saturday June 7, 2008 05:50 EDT
David Broder: Embodiment of Beltway values

David Broder, Washington Post chat, yesterday:

Crestwood, N.Y.: So the Senate report -- supported by two Republicans -- supports the conclusion that we all reached several years ago, that Bush and Cheney used propaganda and ginned up intelligence to trick the country into war. If this is not an impeachable offense, what do you define as one? And if an impeachable offense is committed, isn't it the height of irresponsibility for the Democrats to put possible harm to their electoral chances (negligible, in my opinion) ahead of their oaths to the Constitution? How will history look back at this disgraceful chapter in both the executive and legislative branches?

washingtonpost.com: Bush Inflated Threat From Iraq's Banned Weapons, Report Says (Post, June 6)

David S. Broder: You'll have to forgive me, but I am reluctant to see every big policy dispute turned into a criminal or impeachable affair. There needs to be accountability but there also needs to be proportionality. This country is engaged in two wars and has serious, serious domestic problems. To stop everything and attempt to impeach and remove a president who has less than a year to serve would not strike me as the best use of our energy. And for what? So Dick Cheney can be president?

snip//

Indeed. The Beltway media, as its Dean, David Broder, said, has been nothing over the last seven years but "calm and quiet" -- just like well-behaved, respectful children are expected to be. When Scott McClellan used the term "complicit enablers" to describe our press corps, this is the face of that: soothingly assuring the public that there is nothing at all unusual or radical about what's going on in our Government, that everything from torture to warrantless, illegal spying to process-less detentions and the abolition of habeas corpus and even lying our country into war are just standard "policy disputes" that should be resolved in a gentlemanly manner through respectful and civil discourse, not by excessive and mean-spirited weapons such as investigations and prosecutions. As Broder said, the notion that there should be a "sense of urgency" is for people who "get carried away by their own rhetoric."

The same stars of the Liberal Media who paralyzed the country for two years with their fixation on Bill Clinton's sex scandal -- and who relentlessly insisted that he be forced from office -- have spent the last seven years calmly telling us that there is no reason to get all excited or upset by what the administration has been doing. As the administration repeatedly broke multiple laws and degraded every last realm of our political culture, most of our Broder-led media class remained nice and "calm and quiet." Of course they don't believe there should be any consequences for the crimes that have been committed by this administration because, as complicit enablers in all of it, those crimes are also their own.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. History will not look kindly on David Broder, either
In fact, I believe that sometime in 2060 or so, some scholar will be digging up these facts and will be open-mouthed in wonder. A totally corrupt government aided and abetted by media and the legislative branch.

People in other countries have rioted in the streets for much less than these crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Broder is the epitome
of what is wrong with modern journalism. So lost in his own tiny world. You just have to ask how it is possible for dips like this to be employed writing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not precisely in his own "tiny little world"--lost on the DC cocktail circuit
is more like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. And the pattern will be continue with the next presidency
Greenwald said: "The same stars of the Liberal Media who paralyzed the country for two years with their fixation on Bill Clinton's sex scandal -- and who relentlessly insisted that he be forced from office -- have spent the last seven years calmly telling us that there is no reason to get all excited or upset by what the administration has been doing."

If Obama wins the GE, the "Liberal Media" will find against him to obsess over until they nearly hound him out of office, whereas if it's McCain, he'll continue to get the pass they've already given him.

In fact, there's no reason to believe they'll wait until the GE is over; they'll just continue tomorrow with the pattern they've already started - glossing over McCain's flaws and fixating on anything they can find against Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC