Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coulter selected not elected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 10:50 AM
Original message
Coulter selected not elected
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucac/20080605/cm_ucac/obamawasselectednotelected;_ylt=AiI579ZdIJ9GORTYyZTjcKn9wxIF">link

But now Hillary has won the popular vote in a Democratic primary, while Obambi has won under the rules. In a spectacular turnabout, media commentators are heaping sarcasm on our plucky Hillary for imagining the "popular vote" has any relevance whatsoever. It's the exact same situation as in 2000, with Hillary in the position of Gore and Obama in the position of Bush. The only difference is: Hillary has a much stronger argument than Gore ever did (and Hillary's more of a man than Gore ever was).

Of course that's not true. It's not even close to the same thing as 2000. Hint to Coulter the rules of the 2000 presidential election and the 2008 Democratic primary were different. For starters in 2000 there weren't two states that where declared non-contest in which voters were told not to bother voting (the Republicans decided not to count votes after the Florida people voted). Some states don't even have popular vote totals. Finally no one argued Gore should be president because he won the popular vote, they argue he should be president because by any rational and honest count of Florida vote shows Gore won the state and the electoral college. (at worst the state was a statistical tie in which the vote difference was hopelessly within the counting error). Any honest person would say it's impossible to know who won the popular vote in the Democratic primary because well it wasn't a measuring stick for anything and thus there was no accurate attempt to record it.

That's not the point of this anyways. No one voted for Coulter to be able to give her opinions out there to the public. She (as most op ed writing republicans)is almost always wrong, inaccurate, deceiving and just plan baseless in her facts and opinion expressed. Such as the whole Hillary-Gore introduction to her opinion article used to try to convince me. Why exactly do these people continue to get to express their opinion using the mass media to me? I would point out to Coulter this is a representative republic and not a Democracy. She should be happy we live in a representative republic, because apparently some Americans want to be represented by liars, morons and fantasy factoid historians. Without such people there is simply no justification that Coulter herself should have her opinions receive such mass marketing. In any honest democratic count of her opinions would quickly find shes been wrong nearly 100 % of the time and thus there is simply no point to hearing what she has to say. Coulter has been selected not elected to be a spokes person by the mass media and she should thank god such a system is in place in the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hate to beak the new to Coulter...
... but a political party can select a candidate if it wishes by a coin toss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mulsh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. why are you giving even remote creedence to coulter's ravings?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Coulter--a blast from the past. I was doing quite well with out the
radioactive idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. When has being accurate and honest ever been a requirement for
a Right-Wing pundit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's a name I haven't heard of in a while.
I could have gone without hearing it ever again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Conservative is the new "C" word but take it back, Coulter is right up there too
Edited on Fri Jun-06-08 12:22 PM by EVDebs
I even went on my favorite web community owned by News Corp, myspace to be exact, and commented about the conservative views a person openly held but did not want mentioned on a friend's blog--and I was summarily 'defriended' and 'user blocked'--for using the "C" word, they were conservative, but that was considered a personal attack. Go figure.

I'd PROUDLY be called a liberal or a progressive any time any place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Annie has crawled out of the woodwork?
Fun, fun, fun!

I think we need a big can of Raid again to send her back!

Perhaps she wanted to remain low profile because she had a warrant out for her arrest (re: her felonious adventures in Florida!). Or maybe not. I wouldn't be disappointed if it were true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-06-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is the meme
I have been reading on Usenet. Those repukes! Always concerned about democracy and fair elections!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC