Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio right-winger losing his marbles...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:10 PM
Original message
Ohio right-winger losing his marbles...
On the Fidonet, I'm sparring with a total right-wing loony.

"RS" is me, ">" is the loon.

> RS>It's now obvious, except to the Bush cheerleaders.
>
> RS>Bush's misadministration *LIED* and suckered us into an invasion of
> RS>Iraq that benefits only *ONE* group.
> RS>Bush's, Cheney's, and the rest of their cronies' buddies in
> RS>Halliburton, Blackwater, and the other war profiteers.
>
> RS>Next January, Bush, Cheney and the rest will cut and run to thier
> RS>posh retirement homes while leaving this colossal fiasco for the
> next RS>guy to deal with.
>
> RS>White House Exaggerated Iraqi Threat, Senate Report Finds
>
> RS>By Joby Warrick
> RS>Washington Post Staff Writer
> RS>Thursday, June 5, 2008; 3:46 PM
>
> RS>President Bush and his top aides repeatedly exaggerated what they
> RS>knew about the threat from Iraqi nuclear, biological and chemical
> RS>weapons as the administration pressed its case for war against
> Iraq, RS>the Senate intelligence committee said today in a
> long-awaited RS>report.
>
> RS>While most of the administration's pre-war claims about Iraq
> RS>reflected now- discredited U.S. intelligence reports, the White
> House RS>crossed a line by conveying certainty about Saddam Hussein's
> ability RS>to threaten the United States with weapons of mass
> destruction, RS>according to the report approved by the committee's
> Democratic RS>leaders and a handful of Republicans.
>
> RS>"In making the case for war, the administration repeatedly
> presented RS>intelligence as fact when it was unsubstantiated,
> contradicted or RS>even non- existent," Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV
> (D-W.Va.), the RS>committee chairman, said at a news conference. "As a
> result, the RS>American people were led to believe that the threat
> from Iraq was RS>much greater than actually existed."
>
> Rockefeller should be in jail. As for the war, it looks like we a
> close to mopping this up and being able to declare victory. I realize
> that

You have *ANY* clue as to how jingoistic and flat-out of an total moron
you are? "Rockefeller should be in jail."

For WHAT??!!??

Your twisted version of what constitutes treason?

"mopping this up and being able to declare victory"

Bull-SHIT, liar.

http://tinyurl.com/5jhmu7

50 damn bases, and total immunity from Iraqi laws for US troops and
contractors is not "victory." It's a goddamn OCCUPATION.

By your logic, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia was a "victory."

is
> blasphemy to the left. Al Qaeda has been defeated in Iraq. Of course

Al-Qaeda wasn't even *IN* Iraq until Bush and his goons went in, stupid.

> the far left, including Obaba, want to snatch defeat from the jaws of
> victory and turn it all back over to Al Qaeda. Let's see if the
> public agrees with this in November.

"turn it all back over to Al Qaeda"

Another right-wing talking point with ZILCH to back it up.
It's factional fighting between the corrupt Sunnis, and the even more
corrupt Shias, that accounts for 95+ percent of the violence in Iraq.

Your little right-wing talking points says one of two things:

1. You own stock in the corrupt war profiteers

2. You're so damn stupid if Bush said the Magic Ponys would go into Iraq
and everything would be all flowers and bunnies, you'd believe him.

Guess what. Your bunch of corrupt bastards LIED, and you dutifully trot
out the right-wing talking points in your lame, totally desperate
attempt to divert from the FACTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC