Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. weekly initial jobless claims rise 6,000 to 371,000 or down by 18K... which is it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 07:55 AM
Original message
U.S. weekly initial jobless claims rise 6,000 to 371,000 or down by 18K... which is it?
Un-f**king-believable! :grr:

can't all these idiot liars get their facts straight?

---------------------------------

U.S. weekly initial jobless claims rise 6,000 to 371,000

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-weekly-initial-jobless-claims/story.aspx?guid=%7BAA2E27FE-AEE3-4858-9F24-83F466013674%7D&dist=msr_1

Trend for continuing claims remains above 3 million


By Ruth Mantell, MarketWatch

Last update: 8:33 a.m. EDT May 15, 2008

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) --

The number of people filing for the first time for unemployment benefits rose 6,000 to 371,000, on
a seasonally adjusted basis, in the week ending May 10, the Labor Department reported Thursday.
The four-week average of initial claims, which smooths out one-time factors such as bad weather
or holidays, fell 1,000 to 365,750.

In the week ending May 3, the number of people collecting benefits gained 28,000 to 3.06 million -
the highest level since March 2004. The four-week average of continuing claims increased 15,250 to 3.02 million -
- the highest level since April 2004. Compared with last year, both initial and continuing claims are up about 23%.

Initial claims represent job destruction, while the level of continuing claims indicates how hard
or easy it is for displaced workers to find new jobs. The insured unemployment rate, representing
the proportion of those covered by unemployment insurance who are receiving benefits, remained at 2.3%.

Claims have been volatile in recent weeks, reaching a nearby peak of 406,000 in late March. During
recessions in the past, first-time claims have typically risen to at least 400,000 and remained
there. In this downturn, rather than fire workers, employers have been cutting hours and forcing
them to work part-time.


BUT....



Thomson Financial News

http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2008/05/08/afx4985442.html

U.S. weekly jobless claims down 18,000 to 365,000; continuing claims down 10,000


WASHINGTON (Thomson Financial) -

05.08.08, 9:54 AM ET

In the latest week, the number of individuals filing new claims for unemployment insurance fell
below expectations, while the number of those continuing to receive unemployment insurance fell
but were above expectations, the Labor Department said today.

The number of first-time claims filed in the week ending May 3 fell 18,000 to 365,000, below the
370,000 claims economists polled by Thomson's IFR Markets were expecting.

The four-week moving average for initial claims increased 2,500 to 367,000. Economists prefer
the four-week moving average because it smooths out fluctuations in weekly data.

For the week ending April 26, the number of individuals continuing to receive unemployment
insurance fell by 10,000 to 3.020 mln, above the 3.000 mln claims economists were expecting.


:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. The real numbers are up, but they are lower than what was expected.

those facts are straight forward and listed in what you pasted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Try doing a search for it....
I had to make a concerted effort to get the first article...
All I'm saying is there are more stories claiming unemployment
claims are down... and they aren't.

"unemployment claims increased 16750"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Forbes is full of shit!
MarketWatch is quoting the latest week, May 10: The number of people filing for the first time for unemployment benefits rose 6,000 to 371,000, on a seasonally adjusted basis, in the week ending May 10,...

Forbes bullshit headline is for the week of May 3: The number of first-time claims filed in the week ending May 3 fell 18,000 to 365,000 ...

Why would they headline the old week and ignore the current week?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The Forbes article is dated May 8, so they can't use data ending May 10. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Finally found a current Forbes posting... from the AP
Jobless claims up in sign of further weakness

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/05/15/ap5013241.html

By MARTIN CRUTSINGER 05.15.08, 8:58 AM ET

WASHINGTON -

The number of newly laid off workers applying for unemployment benefits rose slightly
last week, indicating the weak economy was still weighing on the job market.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. don't the unemployment claimants 'fall off' the charts after their claim period expires?
...they may still be unemployed, but the government 'can't track' them because the payments have ceased...

VOILA!!...we'll just act like they are employed (statistically)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. If someone stops getting checks, they are no longer counted.
Yes... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Not counted even before being counted then, because one doesn't
get checks in Ohio--direct deposit or VISA debit card...BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING...Note to self: don't buy any veggie fertilizer (for the garden) and fuel on the same day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. But they are counted if they get $$... I meant when ALL $$ stops
Method of payment isn't the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC