Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton downfall: Did it begin with Katrina effort?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bennyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:07 AM
Original message
Clinton downfall: Did it begin with Katrina effort?
I remember seeing Bill Clinton and GHWB together announcing the relief effort for Katrina victims. Not that I am or was against the efforts, but seeing him with GHWB just made me a little sick to my stomach.

Since then, I have had a hard time talking him seriously. And I ahve had a hard time taking his wife seriously too. I wonder if tehy are willing to jump into bed with anyone, just to make a grand gesture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, it was front and top loading their fund raising, and Bill making
unfortunate statements in SC.

Listening to Mark Penn was another big mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. that pic makes her look like Katie Couric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. For me it began with the Iraq vote
but the images of bill sucking up to daddy boosh didn't help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. The stomach-turner for me...
...was the opening of the Clinton Library after Kerry lost and Bill asked, "Am I the only one who likes both Kerry and Bush?"

That said, I would vote for Hillary if she gets the nomination - how much I'll like doing that diminishes by the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Same here, I'll vote for her over McCasket
but DO NOT expect me to like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. When was the "upfall"??
These are the same people they were in 1992. Marketing and lies can only carry you so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. That is the lamest reason I have ever heard.
Edited on Mon May-12-08 10:15 AM by Skinner
He was trying to help victims of a terrible natural disaster. Two former presidents working together sends a powerful positive message. (To most people, anyway.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. it was the tsunami
but they also did Katrina stuff.

but remember, Skinner, jsut because by teaming up with Bush Sr (a former President of the United States) helped raise $200 MILLION for disaster relief following the Tsunami and Katrina, doesn't mean that Clinton shouldn't have ignored Bush I. people would rather follow the hate than someone who wants to be post-partisan to help people in trouble.

as for the OP, you know what made me sick to my stomach? bodies floating in water. Anything anyone could do to help is a good thing from where I come from. and the idea that Clinton was sucking up to Bush? ever think it was more likely the other way around? the Clinton was the magnanimous one there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. When he pissed off the national press corps in the 1990s
They have hated him with an ungodly passion for nearly two decades, for reasons I have yet to discover.

Some say it was because he kept them off Air Force One. Freepers, of course, will tell you that it is because Clinton is so evil that not even libbruls can stand him.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I think I know why, honestly
Edited on Mon May-12-08 10:21 AM by northzax
the Press, by and large, wants 'class' in the White House, as long as people look good, they don't care.

Clinton was the predecessor for Obama, just as Carter was the predecessor for Clinton, turns out, ANYONE can become President (well, as long as they are brilliant, driven and talented) all three are the American Dream, rising from humble beginnings to power and glory. while it's a good story, no one really likes it, when you are sitting at the top of the pyramid to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. The tsunami relief was a good thing.
We constantly hear of "reaching across the aisle" and "bipartisanship". So when it happens, in this case with two former Presidents of different parties, don't knock it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bennyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. Bush Clinton Katrina Fund
http://www.bushclintonkatrinafund.org/ (hasn't been updated since Fall 07)

Not Tsunami.

maybe I misworded my thread title, but...for me this kind of was the straw that broke the camels back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. Any time people can get together
to help their fellow man I will back them. That is what this entire country should be doing instead of back-stabbing someone you don't like. I feel certain any person who benefitted from Bush's and Clinton's efforts wouldn't turn down aid because of political leanings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. No, her downfall began when she didn't sack her
campaign team after Iowa when it became clear there wasn't going to be a coronation and the top-down strategy of the DLC was not going to cut it with an electorate that was fed up with business as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. Normal readers are reminded that nothing a Clintophobe says about the Clintons counts for shit.
Edited on Mon May-12-08 02:20 PM by Perry Logan
Unbelievably weird, isn't it? The Repubs mount a massive smear campaign against Bill Clinton and his family in the 90's...

...and the victims are still with us, in this very thread, damaging the party in every way they can and thinking they're righteous.

Clintophobes--you know, the assholes who are ruining DU--like to post these threads where they agree with one another on the bullshit accusations they've made against the Clintons.

I'm here to burst that bubble, and remind any normal people reading this slimy thread that the Clintophobes live in a fantasy world in which the Clintons closely resemble the villains from a bad comic book and are instantly found guilty of any old thing you can make up about them.


Now get out of here and go find some people who like Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. And what of the Obamaphobes? Are they all squeeky clean?
I'd really like your take on what the Obamaphobes are doing to this thread? Are those assholes ruining DU? Or are those assholes acceptable assholes because they support your candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC