Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Army's 'stop-loss' orders up dramatically over last year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 03:15 PM
Original message
U.S. Army's 'stop-loss' orders up dramatically over last year

U.S. Army's 'stop-loss' orders up dramatically over last year
The jump coincides with the extension of combat tours from 12 to 15 months.
By Julian E. Barnes, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
May 9, 2008


WASHINGTON -- The number of soldiers forced to remain in the Army involuntarily under the military's controversial "stop-loss" program has risen sharply since the Pentagon extended combat tours last year, officials said Thursday.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates was briefed about the program by Army officials who said that thousands of new stop-loss orders were issued to keep soldiers from leaving the service after Gates ordered combat tours extended from 12 to 15 months last spring.

The Army has resorted to involuntary extensions of soldiers' enlistment terms to prevent them from leaving immediately before a combat tour or in the middle of a deployment.

Army officials have argued that the policy is necessary to ensure that they are not forced to send inadequately trained soldiers and unprepared units into war.

However, many soldiers subjected to the stop-loss policy consider it a backdoor draft. Critics argue that once soldiers have completed the enlistment period they agreed to, they should be allowed to return home. The involuntary retention program is so unpopular that it helped inspire a recent movie called "Stop-Loss."

The number of soldiers held in the Army under the stop-loss program reached a high in March 2005 of 15,758. That number steadily declined through May 2007, when it hit 8,540. But since then, the number of soldiers subjected to stop-loss orders began to increase again, reaching 12,235 in March 2008.

more...

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-stoploss9-2008may09,0,851069.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Keith also mentioned that a HUGE number of soldiers who were
classified "unfit" for duty due to injuries, or PTSD were being sent back in. (I don't remember the # but it was in the tens of thousands.)

They are breaking the biggest, most expensive tool on the toolbelt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, here's the info KO was referring to. How much more obvious
does it have to get that the Pentagon and 'powers-that-be' just don't give a crap? And don't get me started on McCain and the GI Bill...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=3258940
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. The military is being abused. and it's not even THEIRS..
It's OURS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC