|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:10 PM Original message |
Was the Libby jury fairly chosen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. If both sides want a mostly white jury... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yes, It Was. It Went Through The Same Process As Any Other Trial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I know it isn't totally random |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Nope. Doesn't Smell Funny. The Process Was Perfectly Legitimate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I would love to see what the original pool was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted message |
Jonathan50 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Then don't read the thread.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I think he was being sarcastic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Annces (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
7. I think more black jurors were dismissed because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
11. You would have to show that the jury notices went to a statistically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Deleted message |
kirby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. Jury of his peers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-03-07 08:18 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Hi kirby!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-02-07 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
14. Yes - prosecution and defense both had a say in jury selection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC