Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CODEPINK Interrupts Hillary Clinton Again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CODEPINK Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:50 PM
Original message
CODEPINK Interrupts Hillary Clinton Again
Last week, Senator Hillary Clinton held a fundraiser in San Francisco at the Sheraton Palace Hotel. San Franciscans who have spoken out against the war repeatedly gathered outside the hotel for a rally and press conference, urging the New York senator and presidential would-be to put action behind her words and end the Iraq war. About thirty demonstrators outside the hotel handed out flyers that read, "Hillary Stop Funding War" and encouraged funders entering the event to ask Hillary hard-hitting questions about her stance on the war.

Meanwhile, five activists made their way into the private donors-only event. Two hotel guests found their way to seats in the audience, while three of us took on a new creative tact. Dressed in chef’s white coats with nametags and (mock) Hillary campaign badges, we entered the event, and when Hillary began her talk, we unfurled large hot pink banners that read "Hillary Stop Funding War" and "We Need a Peace President." Two of us were positioned behind Hillary, which made for some excellent photos. A third was stage right, making it appear as though there was a sea of pink popping up around the room. The security people were slow to respond to us and finally took our banners and escorted us out.

On my way out I stated very loudly and passionately, "Hillary please stop funding the war!" As I was shouting, a woman clocked me in the chin and hooked her fingers into my mouth, grabbing at my jaw as if to yank it off. I felt like I was being bridled. Stunned, I didn’t speak up to demand that she be identified and held by the police. I was amazed that here in America supporters of a presidential candidate could so easily assault someone with an opinion they don’t approve of, and a Democrat no less.

I faced a similar response at a Hillary engagement with the BAR Association in San Francisco about a year ago—after holding up a banner, I was chocked by the security official, and the audience members sitting within inches of me did nothing to help me. The anger and aggression with which people react to our actions still astounds me. It makes those with contrary political opinions appear tenuous at best. After we were taken out of the event, we were detained in a small room for the remainder of the event, cited for "disrupting a meeting," and released.

My interaction with the SFPD was pretty calm and respectable, but not all the protesters had such a smooth experience. At the start of the event, fundraiser host Susie Beale commented that she’s eager to see change in this country, and when she and another host asked if the room was ready for a woman president, the crowd applauded enthusiastically. I wanted to applaud too. I was raised with the idea that I could grow up to be anything I wanted to be, and that women could now choose their professions freely. "We don’t have to serve the boss coffee these days, so honey you be strong and burst through that glass ceiling" was my mom’s refrain. I decided I would blast through the gender barriers in a space shuttle as an astronaut, or stomp them out while tromping through the jungle doing scientific research. So understandably, just like most gals my age, I get psyched about the idea of a woman president. But I want to see a president with values, and being a woman just isn’t enough to buy my vote. I want to vote for a peace candidate, someone who is unafraid to take leadership to bring us out of Iraq, and speaks out against any future aggression towards Iran.

Right now Hillary has the worst position on Iraq of any of the Democratic presidential candidates. Her latest call for a phased withdrawal with no end date is totally inadequate. Hillary’s new legislation puts a cap on troop levels, while units are already being deployed to Iraq—the cow’s out of the barn on that one—and her proposal threatens to cut off funding to the Iraqis if their government doesn’t meet certain standards in six months—talk about blaming the victim! Hillary said at the fundraiser on Friday, as if responding to our earlier disruption, "Yes, we do have to end the war in Iraq, and we have to do it as soon as we possibly can!" Hillary, if this is what you believe in your heart, then don’t wait to be president to do something—act now to bring our servicemen and women home and secure a better tomorrow for Iraq!

There may come a day when disrupting Hillary feels like shouting at a brick wall, or George Bush. But for now, when Hillary is still using the verb "listening" and is vulnerably vying for the presidential nomination, I am still hopeful. And I’m hopeful that Americans will keep pressuring the candidates to stand up for peace, especially those who have the purse power to make or break their campaigns. The bottom line to wealthy Democrats is this: until Hillary takes action in the Senate to responsibly end the Iraq occupation, funding Hillary is funding war.

Rae Abileah (rae@codepinkalert.org) is a national organizer with CODEPINK: Women for Peace. She lives in Oakland, California. For more info about the Listen Hillary campaign, visit www.listenhillary.org

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wish we guys had a codepink org.
ya'll rock!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. We do. It's called "Tobey Keith," unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Right on
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R for CODEPINK nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. As a Democrat
I can not support your Republican-like measures. no wonder we never win a Presidental election - we are too busy back-stabbing each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree and I am also skeptical about the credibility of the story. Never has
Edited on Fri Mar-02-07 06:48 PM by live love laugh
any story directly from a member of Code Pink appeared here for a Republican disruption. Why such over the top treatment for Hillary?

Something's fishy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Here are the pictures and the link
which is also a direct link from code pink

Link to article and pics:

http://www.listenhillary.org/article.php?id=1764

Page on Code Pink where you can click over to the Listen Hillary blog:

http://www.codepink4peace.org/article.php?list=type&type=136

Nothing fishy...the site for Code Pink is CodePink4peace.org, and their goal is to end the war. It matters not who the supporters of the war are, it is what it is as far as Hillary Clinton and her stance on the war...women for peace do not give you a pass on this issue, even if you are a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. over the top?
Edited on Fri Mar-02-07 07:22 PM by leftchick
perhaps because she has been pro-war. She needs her feet held to the fire like any pro-war repuke. I saw the pics of the protests and they were excellent. Who in their right mind would vote for a pro-war dem? :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Why are you skeptical? You think it didn't happen?
:shrug:

Local News

Posted: Friday, 23 February 2007 6:18AM

Clinton Speaks in the Bay Area

http://kcbs.com/pages/263435.php?contentType=4&contentId=346212

SAN FRANCISCO (KCBS) --

New York Senator and Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton spoke in San Francisco
today at a sold-out, lunch fundraiser.

Clinton received a warm welcome of applause as she stepped up to the stage at the Sheraton
Palace Hotel before a crowd of about 900 people.

KCBS' Margie Shafer, who attended the luncheon, reports the popular senator spoke about a wide
range of issues during the half-hour presentation, including health care, education, energy
policy, and Iraq.

But “Code Pink” anti-war protestors, a women-initiated grassroots organization, briefly interrupted the event.
The small group of activists, who carried signs that read "Stop The War", heckled Senator Clinton
as police quickly escorted them outside.

More at link....

------------

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I guess it is somewhat similar to why Democrats criticize Greens for screwing up elections
They aren't the main problem, but somehow it seems like they should know better.

Hillary is hardly the worst warmonger (why isn't Codepink disrupting a McCain event?) but her position stings because they feel she ought to agree with them.

Of course, it's counterproductive, but whatever. First amendment, yada, yada, yada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Cant you find a republican
to take this kind of action against? As for your tale about how you were assaulthed, sorry to hear it, but why did you find it so necessary to recount not only that experience but another similar experience that also occured at a Hillary event? What precisely are you trying to say?

I'm not terribly impressed by Hillary, but I'm even less impressed by the dedication with which Codepink is hounding her. The truth is that her position on Iraq, while not perfect, is not quite how you characterized it.

Finally, if you think that your action will have any effect on Hillary's fundraising, or position, you need to think again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. More effective to target
those who falsely portray themselves. We all know what to expect to from the likes of McCain, Romney but Hillary is in fact the perfect target for she is iconic in her representation of a certain faction of the Party which has been corporatist and militarist AND disingenuous. The likes of Hastert and Co. are quite honest in their criminality. Hillary dresses it up and dances around the issues. Many people find this very offensive.

Some also think the strategy is more effective because Hillary may be able to be pressured and/or embarrassed to shift her position and if her position is altered this would be quite a signifier. Personally I think she is intransigent and the record shows her to be a lifetime corporatist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Sorry, I think what you wrote is
complete rubbish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Codepink is a thorn in
hillary's side alright! As one of many many constituents who she wouldn't listen to..I hope you have better luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC