Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Battle Of Coral Sea 7-8May 1942 66years ago today USS Lexington CV2 Sinks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:35 PM
Original message
Battle Of Coral Sea 7-8May 1942 66years ago today USS Lexington CV2 Sinks
Battle of the Coral Sea, 7-8 May 1942 --
Overview and Special Image Selection
The Battle of the Coral Sea, fought in the waters southwest of the Solomon Islands and eastward from New Guinea, was the first of the Pacific War's six fights between opposing aircraft carrier forces. Though the Japanese could rightly claim a tactical victory on "points", it was an operational and strategic defeat for them, the first major check on the great offensive they had begun five months earlier at Pearl Harbor. The diversion of Japanese resources represented by the Coral Sea battle would also have immense consequences a month later, at the Battle of Midway.

The Coral Sea action resulted from a Japanese amphibious operation intended to capture Port Moresby, located on New Guinea's southeastern coast. A Japanese air base there would threaten northeastern Australia and support plans for further expansion into the South Pacific, possibly helping to drive Australia out of the war and certainly enhancing the strategic defenses of Japan's newly-enlarged oceanic empire.

The Japanese operation included two seaborne invasion forces, a minor one targeting Tulagi, in the Southern Solomons, and the main one aimed at Port Moresby. These would be supported by land-based airpower from bases to the north and by two naval forces containing a small aircraft carrier, several cruisers, seaplane tenders and gunboats. More distant cover would be provided by the big aircraft carriers Shokaku and Zuikaku with their escorting cruisers and destroyers. The U.S. Navy, tipped off to the enemy plans by superior communications intelligence, countered with two of its own carriers, plus cruisers (including two from the Australian Navy), destroyers, submarines, land-based bombers and patrol seaplanes.

Preliminary operations on 3-6 May and two days of active carrier combat on 7-8 May cost the United States one aircraft carrier, a destroyer and one of its very valuable fleet oilers, plus damage to the second carrier. However, the Japanese were forced to cancel their Port Moresby seaborne invasion. In the fighting, they lost a light carrier, a destroyer and some smaller ships. Shokaku received serious bomb damage and Zuikaku's air group was badly depleted. Most importantly, those two carriers were eliminated from the upcoming Midway operation, contributing by their absence to that terrible Japanese defeat.



:patriot: :patriot: :hi:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rdenney Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for reminding us of the sacrifices of the WW II generation.
:patriot: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. and don't forget the Yorktown and
the repair crews that worked tirelessly to bring her back to fighting strength in time for Midway.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yorktown
The repair yard said it would take about 3months for repairs
Nimitz gave them 3days.............................
:patriot: :patriot:

:woohoo:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wain Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Parche, thanks for remembering this important WW2 naval battle
The significance of this battle is that the Japanese war expansion was halted. Midway was the turning point.

Years ago I read the full set of U S Navy History in WW2 by Adm Samuel Eliot Morrison, famed Harvard historian. If you ever get a chance this is an extraordinary history told by a renowned historian that served active duty in the Navy, participating in many of the actions in the Atlantic and Pacific theaters of battle. Your post now makes me want to again read the full set of volumes. Thanks again, especially as I'm tiring of reading so many leadership books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This battle made the Victory at Midway possible
Two large deck Japanese carriers were damage during the battle and returned to Japan for repairs. They were not available for service by June of 1942.
If these ships would have been available to Admiral Yamamoto, the numbers at Midway would have been 6 to 3 instead of 4 to 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Books
Yes I have read them a few years back, and they are incredible

I Recommend 'The Fighting Lady (Uss Yorktown CV10)

'Magnificent Mitscher'
'Quiet Warrior (Admiral Spruance)
'Thunder Below (Uss Barb)
'WAHOO' (Uss Wahoo0
'Clear The Bridge (UssTang)
'Bull Halsey (Fleet Admiral Halsey Bio)
'Nimitz' (Fleet Admiral Nimitz Bio0
:hi:

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC